Gender and communication in organizational contexts

The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 89-96

  Mumby, Dennis K ^a,b  

^a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b International Communication Association   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855660569     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976053     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Acker, J. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society 4 (1990). 139-158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
2. Ashcraft, K.L. (2005). Feminist organizational communication studies: Engaginggender in public and private. In S. K. May & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 141-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452204536 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204536
3. Ashcraft, K.L., & Mumby, D.K. (2004). Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452229461 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452229461
4. Buzzanell, P.M. Gaining a voice: Feminist organizational communication theorizing. Management Communication Quarterly 7 (1994). 339-383. doi:10.1177/0893318994007004001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318994007004001
5. Conquergood, D. Rethinking ethnography: Toward a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs 58 (1991). 179-194. doi:10.1080/03637759109376222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759109376222
6. Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues 57 (2001). 781-797. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241
7. Eagly, A.H., Johnson, B. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 108 (1990). 233-256. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233
8. Fine, M. (1993). New voices in organizational communication: A feministcommentary and critique. In S. Bowen & N. Wyatt (Eds.), Transforming visions: Feminist critiques in communication studies (pp. 125-166). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
9. Hearn, J., Parkin, W. Gender and organizations: A selective review and critique of a neglected area. Organization Studies 4 (1983). 219-242. doi:10.1177/017084068300400302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084068300400302
10. Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
11. Martin, P.Y., Collinson, D. "Over the pond and across the water": Developing the field of "gendered organizations." Gender, Work and Organization 9 (2002). 244-265. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00159
12. Mills, A.J. Organization, gender and culture. Organization Studies 9 (1988). 351-369. doi:10.1177/017084068800900304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900304
13. Mills, A.J., Chiaramonte, P. Organization as gendered communication act. Canadian Journal of Communication 16 (1991). 381-398.
14. Pfeffer, J. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigmdevelopment as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review 18 (1993). 599-620.
15. Rosener, J.B. Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review 68 (1990). 119-125.
16. West, C., Fenstermaker, S. Doing difference. Gender & Society 9 (1995). 8-37. doi:10.1177/089124395009001002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124395009001002
17. West, C., Zimmerman, D. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1 (1987). 125-151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
18. Wilson, F. Organizational theory: Blind and deaf to gender? Organization Studies 17 (1996). 825-842. doi:10.1177/017084069601700506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084069601700506