The role of perspective taking and emotions in punishing identified and unidentified wrongdoers

Cognition and Emotion

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1491-1499

  Kogut, Tehila ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Emotions in decisions; Identifiability effect; Punishment

Indexed keywords

ANGER; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDENTIFIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNISHMENT; VIOLENCE;

ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; HUMANS; PUNISHMENT; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84855643003     PISSN: 02699931     EISSN: 14640600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2010.547563     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
2. Hoffman, M. L. (1970). Moral development. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 261-360). New York, NY: Wiley.
3. Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20-31.
4. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilivich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics of intuitive judgment: Extensions and applications (pp. 49-81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5. Kogut, T. (2009). Public decisions or private decisions? When the specific case guides public decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 91-100.
6. Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005a). The "identified victim effect": An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 157-167.
7. Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005b). The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 106-116.
8. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (2006). The construction of preference. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9. Loewenstein, G. F., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (Series in affective science, pp. 563-673). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. H., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286.
11. Peters, E. (2006). The functions of affect in the construction of preferences. In S. Lichtenstein & P. Slovic (Eds.), The construction of preference (pp. 454-463). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
13. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
14. Slovic, P. (2007). If I look at the mass I will never act: Psychic numbing and genocide. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 1-17.
15. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich & D. Griffin (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397-420). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 5-16.
17. Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The devil you know: The effects of identifiability on punitiveness. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 311-318.
18. Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2006). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 143-153.