Public involvement in multi-objective water level regulation development projects - Evaluating the applicability of public involvement methods

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 281-304

  Väntänen, Ari ^a   Marttunen, Mika ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Interactive planning; Public involvement; Social impact assessment; Water level regulation

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PUBLIC POLICY; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; RIVER BASIN PROJECTS; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL;

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS; WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD);

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

DECISION MAKING; LAKE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; WATER LEVEL; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; WORLD;

EID: 15244358992     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aarhus Convention Newcastle Workshop The public participation in making local environmental decisions. Good practice handbook 2000 Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions London, UK Downloadable at http://www.unece.org/env/pp
2. S.R. Arnstein A ladder of citizen participation Am. Inst. Planners J. 35 4 1967 216 224 (Downloadable at http://www2.eastwestcenter.org/environment/CBFM/ 2_Arnstein.pdf)
3. R.J. Burdge Why is social impact assessment the orphan of the assessment process? Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 20 1 2002 3 9
4. R.J. Burdge, and R.A. Robertson Social impact assessment and the public involvement process Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev. 10 1990 81 90
5. H. Campbell, and R. Marshall Public involvement and planning: looking beyond the one to the many Int. Plan. Stud. 5 3 2000 321 344
6. C. Chess, and K. Purcell Public participation and environment: do we know what works? Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 1999 16
7. J.S. Dryzek The politics of the earth. Environmental discourses 1997 Oxford University Press New York
8. M. Hockings, and B. Carter An integrated model of public contact planning for conservation management Environ. Manage. 22 5 1998 643 654
9. A. Leskinen Environmental planning as learning The principles of negotiation, the diaggregative decision making method and parallel organization in developing the road administration Land Use Economics vol. 5 1994 University of Helsinki, Department of Economics and Management Land Use Economics Helsinki, Finland
10. S. Lockie SIA Review: setting the agenda for impact assessment in the 21st century. impact assessment and the project appraisal J. Int. Assoc. Impact Assess. 19 4 2001 277 287
11. N. Marshall, and R. Roberts That thing called... public involvement. Plan Canada J. Can. Inst. Planners 37 1997 3 (Downloadable at http://www.praxis.ca/ praxis/Articles/Acrobat/Thing.pdf)
12. M. Marttunen, and R.P. Hämäläinen Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment Eur. J. Oper. Res. 87 1995 551 563
13. Marttunen M and Hellsten S. 2003. Heavily Modified Waters in Europe: a Case Study of Lake Kemijärvi, Findland. Suomen ympäristö 630. Helsinki, Finland; Suomen ympäristökeskus.
14. M. Marttunen, and M. Suomalainen Participatory and multiobjective development of water course regulation-creation of regulation alternatives from stakeholders' preferences Paper which was presented in MCDM conference, Whistler, B.C. Canada August 6-11 2004
15. M. Marttunen, S. Hellsten, and A. Keto Sustainable development of lake regulation in Finnish Lakes Vatten 57 1 2001 29 37
16. J. Mustajoki, R.P. Hämäläinen, and M. Marttunen Participatory multicriteria decision support with Web-HIPRE: a case of lake regulation policy Environ. Model. Softw. 19 6 2004 537 547
17. R.K. Morgan Environmental impact assessment. A methodological perspective 1998 luwer Academic Publishers London, UK
18. J. Paldanius Experiences of public participation in Finland B. Solberg S. Miina Conflict management and public participation in land 1997 187 197
19. O. Renn A model for an analytic-deliberative process in risk management Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 1999 16
20. R. Roberts Public involvement: from consultation to participation F. Vanclay D. Bronstein Environmental and social impact assessment 1995 John Wiley And Sons Downloadable at http://www.praxis.ca/resources/index.php
21. R. Roberts Improving decisions. Public involvement in environmental impact assessment: moving to a "newthink" 1999 Praxis Papers Downloadable at http://www.praxis.ca/resources/index.php
22. R. Roberts, and N. Marshall "Overload" in public involvement IAP3 J. 1995 (Downloadable at http://www.praxis.ca/resources/index.php)
23. R. Roberts, and N. Marshall Stakeholder consultation: only one component of public involvement IAP3 J. 1996 (Downloadable at http://www.praxis.ca/ resources/index.php)
24. S. Slotte, and R.P. Hämäläinen Decision structuring dialogue. Systems analyses laboratory research reports 2003 Helsinki University of Technology Downloadable at http://www.e-reports.sal.hut.fi/pdf/E13.pdf
25. Väntänen A, Marttunen M, Turunen J-P, Slotte S, Hiedanpää J. Vuorovaikutteiset suunnittelumenetelmät Kemijärven säännöstelyn kehittämisessä. Suomen ympäristö 658, Luonto ja luonnonvarat. Helsinki, Finland: Suomen ympäristökeskus. Downloadable at http://www.ymparisto.fi/julkaisut. In Finnish, 2004.
26. T. Webler, H. Kastenholz, and O. Renn Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev. 15 1995 443 463
27. T. Webler, S. Tuler, and R. Krueger What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public Environ. Manage. 27 3 2001 435 450
28. World Bank Public involvement in environmental assessment: requirements, opportunities and issues Environmental Assessment Sourcebook Update vol. 5 1993 Downloadable at http://www.worldbank.org