Diffusion-weighted imaging in the prostate: An apparent diffusion coefficient comparison of half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and echo planar imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 189-194

  Babourina Brooks, Ben ^a   Cowin, Gary J ^a   Wang, Deming ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

ADC; B value; Diffusion; DWI; EPI; HASTE; Prostate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; HALF FOURIER ACQUISITION SINGLE SHOT TURBO SPIN ECHO IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETISM; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; WHOLE BODY SCANNER;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84855477387     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.09.024     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Gibbs P., Tozer D.J., Liney G.P., Turnbull L.W. Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate. Magn Reson Med 2001, 46:1054-1058.
2. Issa B. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002, 16:196-200.
3. Jennings D., Hatton N.B., Guo J., Galonsx J., Trouard T.P., Raghunand N., Marshall J., Gillies R.J. Early response of prostate carcinoma xenografts to docetaxel chemotherapy monitored with diffusion MRI. Neoplasia 2002, 4:255-262.
4. Hosseinzadeh K., Schwarz S.D. Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 20:654-661.
5. Sinha S., Sinha U. In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human prostate. Magn Reson Med 2004, 52:530-537.
6. Gibbs P., Pickles M.D., Turnbull L.W. Diffusion imaging of the prostate at 3.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2006, 41(2):185-188.
7. Pickles M.D., Gibbs P., Sreenivas M., Turnbull L.W. Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal and malignant prostate tissue at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 23:130-134.
8. Sato C., Naganawa S., Nakamura T., Kumada H., Miura S., Takizawa O., et al. Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 21:258-262.
9. Kim C.K., Park B.K., Lee H.M., Kwon G.Y. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil preliminary results. Invest Radiol 2007, 42(12):842-847.
10. Manenti G., Carlani M., Mancino S., Colangelo V., Di Roma M., Squillaci E., et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer. Invest Radiol 2007, 42(6):412-419.
11. DeSouza N.M., Reinsberg S.A., Scurr E.D., Brewster J.M., Payne G.S. Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: the value of apparent diffusion coefficients for identifying malignant nodules. Br J Radiol 2007, 80:90-95.
12. Ren J., Huan Y., Wang H Zhao H., Ge Y., Chang Y., Liu Y. Diffusion-weighted imaging in normal prostate and differential diagnosis of prostate diseases. Abdom Imaging 2008, 33:724-728.
13. Gürses B., Kabakci N., Kovanlikaya A., Firat Z., Bayram A., Ulueth A.M., et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the normal prostate at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:716-721.
14. Van As N., Charles-Edwards E., Jackson A., Jhavar S., Reinberg S., DeSouza N., et al. Correlation of diffusion-weighted MRI with whole mount radical prostatectomy specimens. Br J Radiol 2008, 81:456-462.
15. Kozlowski P., Chang S.D., Jones E.C., Berean K.W., Chen H., Goldenberg S.L. Combined Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis-correlation with biopsy and histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24:108-113.
16. Shimofusa R., Fujimoto H., Akamata H., Motoori K., Yamamoto S., Ueda T., et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005, 29(2).
17. Miaoa H., Fukatsu H., Ishigaki T. Prostate cancer detection with 3-T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 2007, 61:297-302.
18. Tanimoto A., Nakashima J., Kohno H., Shinmoto H., Kuribayashi S. Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:146-152.
19. Morgan V.A., Kyriazi S., Ashley E., DeSouza N.M. Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection. Acta Radiol 2007, 48(6):695-703.
20. Haider M.A., van der Kwast T.H., Tanguay J., Evans A.J., Hashmi A.T., Lockwood G., et al. Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 189:323-328.
21. Yoshimitsu K., Kiyoshima K., Irie H Tajima T., Asayama Y., Hirakawa M., Ishigami K., et al. Usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient map in diagnosing prostate carcinoma: correlation with stepwise histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 27:132-139.
22. Kumar V., Jagannathan N.R., Kumar Dasb S.C., Jindalb L., Thulkarc S., Guptad S.D., et al. Correlation between metabolite ratios and ADC values of prostate in men with increased PSA level. Magn Reson Imaging 2006, 24:541-548.
23. Kumar V., Jagannathan N.R., Kumar R Thulkar S., Gupta S.D., Dwivedi S.N., Hemal A.K., et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of the prostate in men prior to biopsy: determination of a cut-off value to predict malignancy of the peripheral zone. NMR Biomed 2007, 20:505-511.
24. 1H MR spectroscopic imaging-correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 2008, 246:480-488.
25. 1H MR spectroscopy to increase accuracy in prostate cancer detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188:91-98.
26. Gibbs P., Pickles M.D., Turnbull L.W. Repeatability of echo-planar-based diffusion measurements of the human prostate at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:1423-1429.
27. Tamada T., Sone T., Toshimitsu S Imai S., Jo Y., Yoshida K., Yamamoto A., et al. Age-related and zonal anatomical changes of apparent diffusion coefficient values in normal human prostatic tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 27:552-556.
28. Kozlowski P., Chang S.D., Goldenberg L. Diffusion-weighted MRI in prostate cancer- comparison between single-shot fast spin echo and echo planar imaging sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 26:72-76.
29. Correia M.M., Carpenter T.A., Williams G.B. Looking for the optimal DTI acquisition scheme given a maximum scan time: are more b-values a waste of time?. Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 27(2):163-175.
30. Shinmoto H., Oshio K., Tanimoto A., Higuchi N., Okuda S., Kuribayashi S., et al. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 27(3):355-359.
31. Stejskal E., Tanner J.E. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965, 42:288-292.
32. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical notes: measurement error. Br Med J 1996, 313:774.
33. Le Bihan D., Breton E., Lallemand D., Aubin M., Vignaud J., Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988, 168:497-505.