FMRI-adaptation to highly-rendered color photographs of animals and manipulable artifacts during a classification task

NeuroImage

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 2941-2951

  Chouinard, Philippe A ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Animals; Categorization; Color processing; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Manipulable artifacts; Repetition suppression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLASSIFICATION; EMOTION; FEMALE; FRONTAL OPERCULUM; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM GYRUS; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INSULA; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; LATERAL FUSIFORM GYRUS; LINGUAL GYRUS; MALE; MEDIAL FUSIFORM GYRUS; MENTAL TASK; NEUROANATOMY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; COLOR; COLOR PERCEPTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855456263     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.073     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arbib M.A. From grasp to language: embodied concepts and the challenge of abstraction. J. Physiol. Paris 2008, 102:4-20.
2. Calder A.J., Keane J., Manes F., Antoun N., Young A.W. Impaired recognition and experience of disgust following brain injury. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3:1077-1078.
3. Cant J.S., Goodale M.A. Attention to form or surface properties modulates different regions of human occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:713-731.
4. Cant J.S., Arnott S.R., Goodale M.A. fMR-adaptation reveals separate processing regions for the perception of form and texture in the human ventral stream. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 192:391-405.
5. Capitani E., Laiaconna M., Mahon B., Caramazza A. What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2003, 20:213-261.
6. Caramazza A., Shelton J.R. Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain the animate-inanimate distinction. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1998, 10:1-34.
7. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage 2000, 12:478-484.
8. Chao L.L., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:913-919.
9. Chao L.L., Weisberg J., Martin A. Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cereb. Cortex 2002, 12:545-551.
10. Chouinard P.A., Goodale M.A. Category-specific neural processing for naming pictures of animals and naming pictures of tools: an ALE meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:409-418.
11. Chouinard P.A., Morrissey B.F., Kohler S., Goodale M.A. Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects. NeuroImage 2008, 41:130-144.
12. Chouinard P.A., Goodale M.A. FMRI adaptation during performance of learned arbitrary visuomotor conditional associations. Neuroimage 2009, 48:696-706.
13. Farah M.J. Visual agnosia 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 2nd ed.
14. Farah M.J., McClelland J.L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1991, 120:339-357.
15. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 1992, 15:20-25.
16. Grefkes C., Fink G.R. The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys. J. Anat. 2005, 207:3-17.
17. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:14-23.
18. Hadjikhani N., Liu A.K., Dale A.M., Cavanagh P., Tootell R.B. Retinotopy and color sensitivity in human visual cortical area V8. Nat. Neurosci. 1998, 1:235-241.
19. Haxby J.V., Gobbini M.I., Furey M.L., Ishai A., Schouten J.L., Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 2001, 293:2425-2430.
20. Hillis A.E., Caramazza A. Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: a double dissociation. Brain 1991, 114:2081-2094.
21. Huettel S.A., McCarthy G. Evidence for a refractory period in the hemodynamic response to visual stimuli as measured by MRI. NeuroImage 2000, 11:547-553.
22. Huettel S.A., Obembe O.O., Song A.W., Woldorff M.G. The BOLD fMRI refractory effect is specific to stimulus attributes: evidence from a visual motion paradigm. NeuroImage 2004, 23:402-408.
23. Jabbi M., Swart M., Keysers C. Empathy for positive and negative emotions in the gustatory cortex. NeuroImage 2007, 34:1744-1753.
24. Jackson P.L., Meltzoff A.N., Decety J. How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. NeuroImage 2005, 24:771-779.
25. Leech G.N., Rayson P., Wilson A. Word frequencies in written and spoken English 2001, Longman, Harlow.
26. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1994, 1:476-490.
27. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2009, 60:27-51.
28. Mahon B.Z., Milleville S.C., Negri G.A., Rumiati R.I., Caramazza A., Martin A. Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron 2007, 55:507-520.
29. Martin A., Chao L.L. Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 11:194-201.
30. Martin A., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 1996, 379:649-652.
31. McKeefry D.J., Zeki S. The position and topography of the human colour centre as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain 1997, 120:2229-2242.
32. Nichols T., Brett M., Andersson J., Wager T., Poline J.B. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. NeuroImage 2005, 25:653-660.
33. Noppeney U., Price C.J., Penny W.D., Friston K.J. Two distinct neural mechanism for category-selective response. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:437-445.
34. Okada T., Tanaka S., Nakai T., Nishizawa S., Inui T., Sadato N., Yonekura Y., Konishi J. Naming of animals and tools: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of categorical differences in the human brain areas commonly used for naming visually presented objects. Neurosci. Lett. 2000, 296:33-36.
35. Petrides M. Specialized systems for the processing of mnemonic information within the primate frontal cortex. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. 1996, 351:1455-1461. discussion 1461-1452.
36. Petrides M., Pandya D.N. Comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human and the macaque ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and corticocortical connection patterns in the monkey. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 16:291-310.
37. Price C.J., Humphreys G.W. The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 1989, 41:797-828.
38. Raksison D.H., Derringer J. Do infants possess an evolved spider-detection mechanisms?. Cognition 2008, 107:381-393.
39. Reddy L., Kanwisher N. Coding of visual objects in the ventral stream. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006, 16:408-414.
40. Rizzolatti G., Arbib M.A. Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci. 1998, 21:188-194.
41. Rumiati R.I., Papeo L., Corradi-Dell'Acqua C. Higher-level motor processes. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2010, 1191:219-241.
42. Schacter D.L., Wig G.S., Stevens W.D. Reductions in cortical activity during priming. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17:171-176.
43. Tootell R.B., Tsao D., Vanduffel W. Neuroimaging weighs in: humans meet macaques in "primate" visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:3981-3989.
44. Valyear K.F., Culham J.C., Sharif N., Westwood D., Goodale M.A. A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: a human fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:218-228.
45. Valyear K.F., Cavina-Pratesi C., Stiglick A.J., Culham J.C. Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp?. NeuroImage 2007, 36(Suppl 2):T94-T108.
46. Warrington E.K., McCarthy R.A. Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 1987, 110:1273-1296.
47. Warrington E.K., Shallice T. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 1984, 107:829-854.
48. Wicker B., Keysers C., Plailly J., Royet J.P., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Both of us disgusted in My insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 2003, 40:655-664.
49. Wojciulik E., Kanwisher N., Driver J. Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. J. Neurophysiol. 1998, 79:1574-1578.
50. Worsley K.J., Evans A.C., Marrett S., Neelin P. Determining the number of statistically significant areas of activation in subtracted activation studies from PET. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1992, 12:900-918.