Using web quality models and a strategy for purpose-oriented evaluations

Journal of Web Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 316-352

  Olsina, Luis ^a   Lew, Philip ^b   Dieser, Alexander ^a   Rivera, Belen ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PAMPA   (Argentina)

^b BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Actual usability; Evaluation strategy; External quality; Improvement; Quality in use; Quality models; SIQinU strategy

Indexed keywords

ACTUAL USABILITY; EVALUATION STRATEGIES; EXTERNAL QUALITY; IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY IN USE; QUALITY MODELS; SIQINU STRATEGY;

QUALITY ASSURANCE; WORLD WIDE WEB;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84855449043     PISSN: 15409589     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Basili V., Lindvall M., Regardie M., Seaman C., Heidrich J., Munch J., Rombach D., Trendowicz A.: Linking software development and business strategy through measurement. IEEE Computer, 43(4), pp. 57-65, 2010.
2. Becker P., Molina H., Olsina L.: Measurement and Evaluation as quality driver. In: Journal ISI (Ingénierie des Systèmes d'Information), Special Issue "Quality of Information Systems", Lavoisier, Paris, France, 15(6), pp. 33-62, 2010.
3. Bevan N.: Extending quality in use to provide a framework for usability measurement. In: LNCS 5619, Springer, HCI Int'l 2009, San Diego, USA, pp. 13-22, 2009.
4. Bevan N., Bohomolni I.: Incorporating user quality requirements in the software development process. In: Proceedings of 4th International Software Quality Week Europe, Brussels, pp. 1192-1204, 2000.
5. Brambilla M., Comai S., Fraternali P., Matera M.: Designing Web Applications with WebML and WebRatio. In: Web Engineering. Modelling and Implementing Web Applications. Springer HCIS, Ch. 9, pp. 221-261, 2008.
6. Burton M., Walther J.: The value of Web log data in use-based design and testing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(3), 2001.
7. Cappiello C., Daniel F., Koschmider A., Matera M., Picozzi M.: A Quality Model for Mashups. In: LNCS 6757, Springer, Web Engineering, 11th Int'l Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE2011), Auer S., Díaz O., Papadopoulos G. (Eds.), Paphos, Cyprus, pp. 137-151, 2011.
8. Covella G., Olsina L.: Assessing Quality in Use in a Consistent Way. In ACM proceedings, Int'l Congress on Web Engineering, (ICWE'06), SF, USA, pp. 1-8, 2006.
9. Fernandez A., Insfran E., Abrahão S.: Integrating a Usability Model into a Model-Driven Web Development Process. In: LNCS 5802, Springer, 10th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE 2009), pp. 497-510, 2009.
10. Hassenzahl M.: User experience: towards an experiential perspective on product quality, IHM; V.339, Proc. 20th Int'l Conference of the Assoc. Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine, pp 11-15, 2008.
11. ISO/IEC 25010: Systems and software engineering. Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE). System and software quality models, 2011.
12. ISO/IEC CD 25010.3, Systems and software engineering. Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE). System and software quality models, 2009
13. ISO/IEC 25012: Software engineering -- Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) -- Data quality model, 2008
14. ISO/IEC 9126-1. International Standard, Software Engineering - Product Quality - Part 1: Quality Model, 2001.
15. ISO 13407: User centered design process for interactive systems, 1998.
16. Lew P., Olsina L.: Instantiating Web Quality Models in a Purposeful Way, In: LNCS 6757, Springer, Web Engineering, 11th Int'l Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE2011), Auer S., Díaz O., Papadopoulos G. (Eds.), Paphos, Cyprus, pp. 214-229, 2011.
17. Lew P., Olsina L., Becker P., Zhang, L.: An Integrated Strategy to Understand and Manage Quality in Use for Web Applications. Requirements Engineering Journal, Springer, 16 (3), pp. 1-32, DOI 10.1007/s00766-011-0128-x, 2011.
18. th Int'l Congress on Web Engineering (ICWE2010), Vienne, Austria, pp. 218-232, 2010.
19. METI, Ministry of Economy - Trade and Industry - Japan, Software Metrics Advanced Project, Investigative Report on Measure for System/Software Product Quality Requirement Definition and Evaluation, March 2011.
20. Molina, H., Olsina, L.: Assessing Web Applications Consistently: A Context Information Approach. IEEE CS, 8th Int'l Congress on Web Engineering, NY, US, pp. 224-230, 2008.
21. Moraga M.A, Bertoa M.F., Morcillo M.C., Calero C., Vallecillo A.: Evaluating Quality-in-Use Using Bayesian Networks. In Proc. of QAOOSE 2008, Paphos, Cyprus, 2008.
22. Murugesan S.: Web Application Development: Challenges and the Role of Web Engineering. Chap. 2 in Springer HCIS, Web Engineering: Modeling and Implementing Web Applications. Rossi G, Pastor O, Schwabe D, Olsina L (Eds.), pp. 7-32, 2008.
23. Nielsen, J: Involving Stakeholders in User Testing, Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox, May 24, 2010, Available at http://www.useit.com/alertbox/utest-observers.html, accessed in Jan, 2011
24. Olsina L., Sassano R., Mich L. Towards the Quality of Web 2.0 Applications, In proc. of 8th Int'l Workshop on Web-oriented Software Technology (IWWOST 2009) held at Int'l Congress on Web Engineering (ICWE09), San Sebastian, Spain, V. 493, pp. 3-15, CEUR (ceur-ws.org), ISSN 1613-0073, 2009.
25. Olsina L., Papa F., Molina H.: How to Measure and Evaluate Web Applications in a Consistent Way. In: Modelling and Implementing Web Applications. Springer HCIS, Ch. 13, pp. 385-420, 2008.
26. Olsina L., Rossi G., Garrido A., Distante D., Canfora G.: Web Applications Refactoring and Evaluation: A Quality-Oriented Improvement Approach, Journal of Web Engineering, Rinton Press, US, 7 (4), pp. 258-280, 2008.
27. Olsina, L.; Lafuente, G. Pastor, O., Towards a Reusable Repository of Web Metrics, Journal of Web Engineering, Rinton Press, US, 1 (1), pp. 61-73, ISSN 1540-9589, 2002.
28. Olsina L., Rossi G.: Measuring Web Application Quality with WebQEM, IEEE Multimedia, 9 (4), pp. 20-29, 2002.
29. Papa M.F. Becker P., Olsina L.: Assessing Integrated Measurement and Evaluation Strategies: A Case Study, To appear in: IEEE Xplore proceeding: 7th Central Eastern European Software Engineering Conference (CEE-SECR 2011), Moscow, Russia, 2011.
30. Prates, R., de Souza, C.; Barbosa, S.: A method for communicability evaluation of user interfaces. Interactions, ACM, 7(1), pp. 31-3, 2000.
31. SPEM. Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification. Doc./02-11-14., Ver.1.0, 2002.