A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations

Animal

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 193-202

  Weller, J I ^a   Ron, M ^a   Glick, G ^a,b   Shirak, A ^a   Zeron, Y ^c   Ezra, E ^d  

^a VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c Department of Ruminant Science   (Israel)

^d Israel Cattle Breeders Association   (Israel)

Author keywords

dairy cattle breeding; genomic selection; quantitative trait loci; single nucleotide polymorphisms

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY COMPOSITION; BREEDING; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MEAT; METHODOLOGY; MILK; PEDIGREE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BODY COMPOSITION; BREEDING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MEAT; MILK; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 84855444253     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731111001704     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S and Lawlor TJ 2010. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 743-752.
2. Baruch E and Weller JI 2008. Incorporation of discrete genotype effects for multiple genes into animal model evaluations when only a small fraction of the population has been genotyped. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4365-4371.
3. Baruch E and Weller JI 2009. Incorporation of genotype effects into animal model evaluations when only a small fraction of the population has been genotyped. Animal 3, 16-23.
4. Cohen-Zinder M, Seroussi E, Larkin DM, Loor JJ, Wind AE-vd, Lee J-H, Drackley JK, Band MR, Hernandez AG, Shani M, Lewin HA, Weller JI and Ron M 2005. Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine ABCG2 gene with a major effect on the QTL on chromosome 6 affecting milk yield and composition in Holstein cattle. Genome Research 15, 936-944. (Pubitemid 40994213)
5. Cromie AR, Berry DP, Wickham B, Kearney JF, Pena J, van Kaam JBCH, Gengler N, Szyda J, Schnyder U, Coffey M, Moster B, Hagiya K, Weller JI, Abernethy D and Spelman R 2010. International genomic co-operation; who, what, when, where, why and how? Proceedings of the Interbull Meeting, Riga, Latvia 42, 72-78.
6. Ducrocq V, Fritz S, Guillaume F and Boichard D 2009. French report on the use of genomic evaluation. Proceedings of the Interbull Meeting, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 17-22.
7. Ezra E, Weller JI and Drori D 1987. Estimation of environmental effect of milk protein content. Heker Umas 9, 31-35 (in Hebrew).
8. Gianola D, de los Campos G, Hill WG, Manfredi E and Fernando R 2009. Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics 183, 347-363.
9. Goddard ME and Hayes BJ 2007. Genomic selection. Journal of Animal breeding and Genetics 124, 323-330. (Pubitemid 350231124)
10. Guillaume F, Fritz S, Boichard D and Druet T 2008. Short communication: correlations of marker-assisted breeding values with progeny-test breeding values for eight hundred ninety-nine French Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2520-2522. (Pubitemid 351807997)
11. Habier D, Fernando RL and Dekkers JCM 2007. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177, 2389-2397. (Pubitemid 350277013)
12. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ and Goddard ME 2009. Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 433-443.
13. Israel C and Weller JI 1998. Estimation of candidate gene effects in dairy cattle populations. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1653-1662. (Pubitemid 128449315)
14. Kerr RJ and Kinghorn BP 1996. An efficient algorithm for segregation analysis in large populations. Journal of Animal breeding and Genetics 113, 457-469. (Pubitemid 126671574)
15. Kuhn MT, Freeman AE and Fernando RL 1999. Approaches investigated to correct for preferential treatment. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 181-190. (Pubitemid 129552331)
16. Legarra A, Aguilar I and Misztal I 2009. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 4656-4663.
17. Liu Z, Seefried F, Reinhardt F and Reents R 2009. A simple method for correcting the bias caused by genomic pre-selection in conventional genetic evaluation. Proceedings of the Interbull Meeting, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 185-188.
18. Loberg A and Durr JW 2009. Interbull survey on the use of genomic information. Proceedings of the Interbull International Workshop on Genomic Information in Genetic Evaluations, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 3-14.
19. Maher B 2008. Personal genomes: the case of the missing heritability. Nature 45, 18-21.
20. Mäntysaari E, Liu Z and VanRaden P 2010. Interbull validation test for genomic evaluations. Proceedings of the Interbull International Workshop on Genomic Information in Genetic Evaluations, Paris, France.
21. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, OConnell J, Moore SS, Smith TPL, Sonstegard TS and Van Tassell CP 2009. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS ONE 4, e5350.
22. Misztal I, Legarra A and Aguilar I 2009. Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 4648-4655.
23. Party C and Ducrocq V 2009. Bias due to genomic selection. Proceedings of the Interbull Meeting 39, Uppsala, Sweden.
24. Settar P and Weller JI 1999. Genetic analysis of cow survival in the Israeli dairy cattle population. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 2170-2177. (Pubitemid 129552456)
25. Tsuruta S, Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A and Lawlor T 2010. Multiple trait genetic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 0489-PP2-15, Leipzig, Germany.
26. VanRaden PM 2008. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4414-4423.
27. VanRaden PM and Wiggans GR 1991. Derivation, calculation and use of national animal model information. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 2737-2746.
28. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF and Schenkel FS 2009a. Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 16-24.
29. VanRaden PM, Wiggans GR,, Sonstegard TS and Schenkel F 2009b. Benefits from cooperation in genomics. Proceedings of the Interbull International Workshop on Genomic Information in Genetic Evaluations, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 67-72.
30. Weigel KA, de los Campos G, GonzÁlez-Recio O, Naya H, Wu XL, Long N, Rosa GJM and Gianola D 2009. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5248-5257.
31. Weller JI and Ezra E 2004. Genetic analysis of the Israeli Holstein dairy cattle population for production and non-production traits with a multitrait animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 1519-1527. (Pubitemid 38893373)
32. Weller JI, Ezra E and Leitner G 2006. Genetic analysis of persistency in the Israeli Holstein population by the multitrait animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2738-2746. (Pubitemid 44047241)
33. Weller JI, Song JZ, Heyen DW, Lewin HA and Ron M 1998. A new approach to the problem of multiple comparisons in the genetic dissection of complex traits. Genetics 150, 1699-1706. (Pubitemid 28555570)
34. Weller JI, Golik M, Seroussi E, Ezra E and Ron M 2003. Population-wide analysis of a QTL affecting milk-fat production in the Israeli Holstein population. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2219-2227. (Pubitemid 39067085)
35. Weller JI, Glick G, Ezra E, Zeron Y, Seroussi E and Ron M 2010. Paternity validation and estimation of genotyping error rate for the BovineSNP50 BeadChip. Animal Genetics 41, 551-553.
36. Wiggans GR, VanRaden PM and Cooper TA 2011. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3202-3211.