Comparison of novel 6.5 Fr sheathless guiding catheters versus 5 Fr guiding catheters for transradial coronary intervention

EuroIntervention

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 930-935

  Chiam, Paul T L ^a   Liu, Bing ^b   Wong, Aaron S L ^a   Wong, Philip E H ^a   Lim, Soo Teik ^a   Koh, Tian Hai ^a   Lim, Victor Y T ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOLOGY   (Singapore)

^b BEIJING HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Catheter; Occlusion; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Radial artery; Spasm; Transradial coronary intervention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; CATHETER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GUIDING CATHETER; HEMATOMA; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; HYDROPHILICITY; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PULSE WAVE; RADIAL ARTERY OCCLUSION; SHEATHLESS GUIDING CATHETER; TRANSRADIAL CORONARY INTERVENTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR ACCESS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY; CATHETERS; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIAL ARTERY;

EID: 84855414321     PISSN: 1774024X     EISSN: 19696213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I8A147     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Holtgen R, Tillmanns H. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:1047-54.
2. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009;157:132-40.
3. Kiemeneij F, Vajifdar BU, Eccleshall SC, Laarman G, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. Evaluation of a spasmolytic cocktail to prevent radial artery spasm during coronary procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;58:281-4. (Pubitemid 36259211)
4. Sanmartin M, Gomez M, Rumoroso JR, Sadaba M, Martinez M, Baz JA, Iniguez A. Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70: 185-9. (Pubitemid 47206027)
5. Pancholy SB. Impact of two different hemostatic devices on radial artery outcomes after transradial catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 2009;21:101-4.
6. Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, Staudt A, Volzke H, Felix SB. A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:172-6.
7. Gwon HC, Doh JH, Choi JH, Lee SH, Hong KP, Park JE, Seo JD. A 5Fr catheter approach reduces patient discomfort during transradial coronary intervention compared with a 6Fr approach: a prospective randomized study. J Interv Cardiol 2006;19:141-7.
8. Gobeil F, Bruck M, Louvard Y, Levevre T, Morice MC, Ludwig J. Comparison of 5 French versus 6 French guiding catheters for transradial coronary intervention: a prospective, randomized study. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16:353-5. (Pubitemid 38891049)
9. Takeshita S, Tanaka S, Saito S. Coronary intervention with 4-French catheters. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:735-9.
10. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;46:173-8. (Pubitemid 29066623)
11. Hamon M, Sabatier R, Zhao Q, Niculescu R, Valette B, Grollier G. Mini-invasive strategy in acute coronary syndromes: direct coronary stenting using 5 Fr guiding catheters and transradial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;55:340-3. (Pubitemid 34204875)
12. Schobel WA, Mauser M. Miniaturization of the equipment for percutaneous coronary interventions: a prospective study in 1,200 patients. J Invasive Cardiol 2003;15:6-11. (Pubitemid 36143005)
13. Koga S, Ikeda S, Futagawa K, Sonoda K, Yoshitake T, Miyahara Y, Kohno S. The use of a hydrophilic-coated catheter during transradial cardiac catheterization is associated with a low incidence of radial artery spasm. Int J Cardiol 2004;96:255-8. (Pubitemid 38979907)
14. Rathore S, Stables RH, Pauriah M, Hakeem A, Mills JD, Palmer ND, Perry RA, Morris JL. Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:475-83.
15. Mamas M, D'Souza S, Hendry C, Ali R, Iles-Smith H, Palmer K, El-Omar M, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Neyses L, Fraser DG. Use of the sheathless guide catheter during routine transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:596-602.