Universal and culture-specific effects of display-control compatibility

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 124, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 425-435

  Proctor, Robert W ^a   Vu, Kim Phuong L ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855409176     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.4.0425     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bae, G. Y., Cho, Y. S., and Proctor, R. W. (2009). Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 746-765.
2. Bergum, B. O., and Bergum, J. E. (1981). Population stereotypes: An attempt to measure and define. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 662-665). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society
3. Brebner, J., and Sandow, B. (1976). The effect of scale side on population stereotype. Ergonomics, 19, 571-580.
4. Brebner, J., Shephard, M., and Cairney, P. (1972). Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 36, 1-15.
5. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6. Chan, A. H. S., and Courtney, A. J. (2001). Color associations for Hong Kong Chinese. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28, 165-170.
7. Cho, Y. S., and Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 45-73.
8. Cho, Y. S., Proctor, R. W., and Yamaguchi, M. (2008). Influences of response position and hand posture on the orthogonal Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1020-1035.
9. Courtney, A. J. (1986). Chinese population stereotypes: Color associations. Human Factors, 28, 97-99.
10. Courtney, A. J. (1992). Control-display stereotypes for multicultural user systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 681-687.
11. De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., Vandorpe, S., and Custers, R. (2005). Further evidence for the role of mode-independent short-term associations in spatial Simon effects. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 659-666.
12. Fitts, P. M. (1951). Engineering psychology and equipment design. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1287-1340). New York, NY: Wiley.
13. S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes
14. Fitts, P. M., and Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
15. Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., and Mangun, G. R. (2008). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
16. Hancock, P., Flach, J., Caird, J., and Vicente, K. (Eds.). (1995). Local applications of the ecological approach to human- machine systems (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Heft, H. (2005). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Hoffmann, E. R. (1997). Strength of component principles determining direction of turn stereotypes: Linear displays and rotary controls. Ergonomics, 40, 199-222.
19. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
20. Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 102-110.
21. Ivanoff, J. (2003). On spatial response code activation in a Simon task. Acta Psychologica, 112, 157-179.
22. Jodo, E. (1987). The effect of stimulus luminance and spatial S-R compatibility on P300 latency. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 46, 51-61.
23. Kaneko, H., Tamura, H., Kawashima, T., and Suzuki, S. S. (2006). A choice reaction-time task in the rat: A new model using air-puff stimuli and lever-release responses. Behavioural Brain Research, 174, 151-159.
24. Kaplan, M. (Ed.). (2004). Cultural ergonomics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25. Kitayama, S., and Cohen, D. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of cultural psychology. New York, NY: Guilford.
26. Koch, I., and Jolicoeur, P. (2007). Orthogonal cross-task compatibility: Abstract spatial coding in dual tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 45-50.
27. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., and Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
28. Kurosu, M., and Hashizume, A. (2009). Culture and communication behavior: A research based on the artifact development analysis. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human centered design, HCII 2009, LNCS 5619 (pp. 468-475). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
29. Loveless, N. E. (1962). Direction of motion stereotypes: A review. Ergonomics, 5, 357-383.
30. Mitchell, M. J. H., and Vince, M. A. (1951). The direction of movement of machine controls. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 24-35.
31. Mou, W., Zhang, K., and Guo, S. (1999). Effects of stimulus- response (S-R) compatibility and response complexity on response selection and response programming process. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 31, 411-417.
32. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Nicoletti, R., and Umiltà, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 333-343.
34. Nishimura, A., and Yokosawa, K. (2006). Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task-irrelevant. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1021-1032.
35. Nishimura, A., and Yokosawa, K. (2007). Preparation for horizontal or vertical dimensions affects the right-left prevalence effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 1242-1252.
36. Notebaert, W., De Moor, W., Gevers, W., and Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). New visuo-spatial associations by training verbospatial mappings in the first language. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 1183-1188.
37. Parasuraman, R., and Rizzo, M. (Eds.). (2007). Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38. Proctor, R. W., and Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416-442.
39. Proctor, R. W., Marble, J., and Vu, K.-P. L. (2000). Mixing incompatibly mapped location-relevant trials with locationirrelevant trials: Effects of stimulus mode on performance. Psychological Research, 64, 11-24.
40. Proctor, R. W., and Vu, K.-P. L. (2002). Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: Influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects. Memory and Cognition, 30, 281-293.
41. Proctor, R. W., and Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
42. Proctor, R. W., Vu, K.-P. L., and Pick, D. F. (2005). Aging and response selection in spatial choice tasks. Human Factors, 47, 250-270.
43. Riehle, A., Kornblum, S., and Requin, J. (1997). Neuronal correlates of sensorimotor association in stimulus-response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1708-1726.
44. Rubichi, S., Vu, K.-P. L., Nicoletti, R., and Proctor, R. W. (2006). Spatial coding in two dimensions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 201-216.
45. Shinar, D., Dewar, R. E., Summala, H., and Zakowska, L. (2003). Traffic sign symbol comprehension: A crosscultural study. Ergonomics, 46, 1549-1565.
46. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor and T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland
47. Simpson, G. C., and Chan, W. L. (1988). The derivation of population stereotypes for mining machines and some reservations on the general applicability of published stereotypes. Ergonomics, 31, 327-335.
48. Smith, S. L. (1981). Exploring compatibility with words and pictures. Human Factors, 23, 305-315.
49. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., and Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of LTM links and STM links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648-670.
50. Urcuioli, P. J., Vu, K.-P. L., and Proctor, R. W. (2005). A Simon effect in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 93-107.
51. Vu, K.-P. L., Ngo, T. K., Minakata, K., and Proctor, R. W. (in press). Shared spatial representations for physical locations and location words in bilinguals' primary language. Memory and Cognition, 38, 713-722.
52. Vu, K.-P. L., and Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 813-828.
53. Vu, K.-P. L., and Proctor, R. W. (2004). Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: Elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 539-556.
54. Weeks, D. J., Proctor, R. W., and Beyak, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: Evidence for spatial coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 367-383.
55. Wong, C. K., and Lyman, J. (1988). American and Japanese control-display stereotypes: Possible implications for design of space station systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 30-34). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.