Comparison of spectral/Fourier domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessment of normal macular thickness

Retina

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 235-245

  Sull, Alan C ^a,b   Vuong, Laurel N ^a   Price, Lori Lyn ^a   Srinivasan, Vivek J ^c   Gorczynska, Iwona ^a,c   Fujimoto, James G ^c   Schuman, Joel S ^d   Duker, Jay S ^a  

^a TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

^d University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Artifact; Fourier; Macular thickness; Normal; Optical coherence tomography; Reproducibility; Segmentation; Spectral

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SEX DIFFERENCE; THICKNESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFACTS; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINA; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 76749128468     PISSN: 0275004X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181bd2c3b     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991;254:1178-1181.
2. Puliafito CA, Hee MR, Lin CP, et al. Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 1995;102:217-229.
3. Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Wong C, et al. Quantitative assessment of macular edema with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:1019-1029.
4. Schuman JS, Hee MR, Puliafito CA, et al. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113:586-596.
5. de Boer JF, Cense B, Park BH, Pierce MC, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE. Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 2003;28:2067-2069.
6. Leitgeb R, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Performance of Fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2003;11:889-894.
7. Choma MA, Sarunic MV, Yang CH, Izatt JA. Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2003;11:2183-2189.
8. Gupta V, Gupta P, Singh R, Dogra MR, Gupta A. Spectraldomain Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography is better than time-domain Stratus optical coherence tomography for evaluation of macular pathologic features in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:1018-1022.
9. Sakamoto A, Hangai M, Yoshimura N. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with multiple B-scan averaging for enhanced imaging of retinal diseases. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1071-1078.
10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7. Ophthalmology 1991;98:741-756.
11. Paunescu LA, Schuman JS, Price LL, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber thickness, macular thickness, and optic nerve head measurements using Stratus OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1716-1724.
12. Ray R, Stinett SS, Jaffe GJ. Evaluation of image artifact produced by optical coherence tomography of retinal pathology. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;139:18-29.
13. Browning DJ, Fraser CM. Regional patterns of sight-threatening diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140: 117-124.
14. Chan A, Duker JS, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS. Normal macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:193-198. (Pubitemid 43247068)
15. Polito A, Del Borello M, Isola M, Zemella N, Bandello F. Repeatability and reproducibility of fast macular thickness mapping with stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1330-1337.
16. Wang XY, Huynh SC, Burlutsky G, Ip J, Stapleton F, Mitchell P. Reproducibility and effect of magnification on optical coher- ence tomography measurements in children. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:484-488.
17. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Winreb RN, et al. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4893-4897.
18. Forooghian F, Cukras C, Meyerle CB, Chew EY, Wong WT. Evaluation of time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the measurement of diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4290-4296.
19. Chauhan DS, Marshall J. The interpretation of optical coherence tomography images of the retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:2332-2342.
20. Srinivasan VJ, Monson BK, Wojtkowski M, et al. Characterization of outer retinal morphology with high-speed, ultrahigh- resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:1571-1579.
21. Sadda SR, Wu Z, Walsh AC, et al. Errors in retinal thickness measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006;113:285-293.
22. Campbell RJ, Coupland SG, Buhrmann RR, Kertes PJ. Effect of eccentric and inconsistent fixation on retinal optical coherence tomography measures. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125: 624-627.
23. Bressler NM, Edwards AR, Antoszyk AN, et al. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Retinal thickness on Stratus optical coherence tomography in people with diabetes and minimal or no diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:894-901.
24. Alamouti B, Funk J. Retinal thickness decreases with age: an OCT study. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:899-901.
25. Kelty PJ, Payne JF, Trivedi RH, Kelty J, Bowie EM, Burger BM. Macular thickness assessment in healthy eyes based on ethnicity using Stratus OCT optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:2668-2672.