AMMI analysis to comprehend genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions in rainfed grown mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

Australian Journal of Crop Science

Volumn 5, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 1767-1775

  Thangavel, P ^a   Anandan, A ^a   Eswaran, R ^a  

^a ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Biplot; Breeding; Drought; Genotype Environment interaction; Vigna radiata; Yield

Indexed keywords

VIGNA RADIATA; VIGNA RADIATA VAR. RADIATA;

EID: 84855374740     PISSN: 18352693     EISSN: 18352707     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aghaee M, Mohammadi R, Nabovati S (2010) Agromorphological characterization of durum wheat accessions using pattern analysis. Aust J Crop Sci. 4(7): 505-514
2. Anandan A, Rajiv G, Eswaran R, Prakash M (2011) Genotypic variation and relationships between quality traits and trace elements in traditional and improved rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. J Food Sci. 76(4): 122-130
3. Anandan A, Sabesan T, Eswaran R, Rajiv G, Muthalagan N, Suresh R (2009) Appraisal of environmental interaction on quality traits of rice by additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis. Cereal Res Comm. 37(1): 139-148
4. Bayuelo-Jimenez JS, Craig, R, Lynch JP (2002) Salinity tolerance of Phaseolus species during germination and early seedling growth. Crop Sci. 42: 584-1594
5. Biradar KS, Salimath PM, Ravikumar RL (2007) Association of Early Vigour with Drought Tolerance in Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Karnataka J Agric Sci. 20(3): 610-612
6. Chiang MY, Hubbel JN (1978) Effect of irrigation on mungbean yield. In: Proceeding of First International Mungbean Symposium, AVRDC, Shanhua, Tainan, pp. 93-96
7. Gauch GH, Zobel RW (1996) AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG (eds) Genotype by environment interaction, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp 85-122
8. Gauch HG (1988) Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44: 705-715
9. Gauch JHG, Zobel RW (1997) Identifying megaenvironments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37: 311-326
10. Gauch Jr. HG (2006) Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci. 46: 1488-500
11. Gollob HF (1968) A statistical model which combines features of factor analysis and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika. 33: 73 - 115
12. Kang CW, Kuo GC, Son ER (1985) Studies on drought tolerance screening method in mungbean 1. Drought tolerance of seedling stage in green house. Res Rept RDA. (crops) 27(1): 191-198
13. Kang CW, Kuo GC, Son ER (1986) Screening mung beans (Vigna radiate L. Wilczek) for drought tolerance 2. Field trial. Res Rept RDA. (crops) 28(1): 156-161
14. Karuppanapandian T, Karuppudurai T, Sinha PB, Haniya AH, Manoharan K (2006) Genetic diversity in green gram [Vigna radiata (L.)] landraces analyzed by using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Afr J Biotechnol. 5: 1214-1219
15. Kumar A, Sharma KD (2009) Physiological Responses and Dry Matter Partitioning of Summer Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) Genotypes Subjected to Drought Conditions. J Agron Crop Sci. 95: 270-277
16. Lafitte HR (1999) Genetic improvement of rice for waterlimited environments: constraints and research opportunities, In: O'Toole JC et al. (ed) Genetic improvement of rice for water-limited environments, IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines
17. Lafitte R, Courtois B (2002) Interpreting cultivar × environment interactions for yield in upland rice: assigning value to drought-adaptive traits. Crop Sci 42: 1409-1420
18. Lee SJ, Yan W, Joung KA, Ill MC (2003) Effects of year, site, genotype, and their interactions on the concentration of various isoflavones in soybean. Field Crops Res. 81:181-192
19. Mc Laren CG, Chaudhary RC (1998) Use of additive main effects and multiplicative interaction models to analyze multilocation rice variety trials. Oryza. 34: 306-318
20. Osiru MO, Olanya OM, Adipala E, Kapinga R, Lemaga B (2009) Yield stability analysis of Ipomoea batatus L. cultivars in diverse environments. Aust J Crop Sci. 3(4): 213-220
21. Pannu RK, Singh DP (1987) Influence of water deficits on morpho-physiological and yield behaviour of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) wilczek). Paper presented the 2nd international symposium on mungbean, AVRDC, Bangkok, Thailand, 16-20 November 1987
22. Sangakkaran UR, Frehner M, Nosberger J, (2000) Effect of soil moisture and potassium fertilizer on shoot water potential, photosynthesis and partitioning of carbon in mungbean and cowpea. J Agron Crop Sci. 185: 201-207
23. Sivapalan S, Brien LO, Ferrara GO, Hollamby GL, Barclay I, Martin PJ (2000) An adaptation analysis of Australian and CIMMYT/ICARDA wheat germplasm in Australian production environments. Aust J Agric Res. 51: 903-915
24. Taiz L, Zeiger E (2002) Plant Physiology, 3rd ed. Sinauer Associates Inc Publishers Massachusetts
25. Thomas MJR, Fukai S, Peoples MB (2004) The effect of timing and severity of water deficit on growth, development, yield accumulation and nitrogen fixation of mungbean. Field Crops Res. 86: 67-80
26. Vijayalakshmi P, Amirthaveni S, Devadas RP, Weinberger K, Tsou SCS, Shanlnugasundaram S (2003) Enhanced bioavailability of iron from mung beans and its effects on health of school children. Technical Bulletin No. 30. Shanhua, Tainan, Taiwan 741, Republic of China (ROC). Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center. p 32
27. Wahid A, Rasul E (2004) Photosynthesis in leaf, stem, flower and fruit. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of Photosynthesis, 2nd ed. CRC Press Florida, pp 479-497
28. Yan W, Rajcan I (2002) Biplots analysis of the test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42: 11-20
29. Yoshida S (1981) Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines
30. Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch Jr HG (1988) Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron J. 80: 388-393