Comparative in vitro efficacy of antimicrobial shampoos: A pilot study

Veterinary Dermatology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Young, Rebecca ^a   Buckley, Laura ^a   Mcewan, Neil ^a   Nuttall, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC; DISINFECTANT AGENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOG; DRUG EFFECT; MALASSEZIA; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE; PENICILLIN RESISTANCE; PILOT STUDY; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS;

ANIMALS; DISINFECTANTS; DOGS; DRUG RESISTANCE, MULTIPLE, BACTERIAL; HAIR PREPARATIONS; MALASSEZIA; METHICILLIN RESISTANCE; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; PILOT PROJECTS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MALASSEZIA; MALASSEZIA PACHYDERMATIS; OVIS ARIES; PSEUDOMONAS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS PSEUDINTERMEDIUS;

EID: 84855359649     PISSN: 09594493     EISSN: 13653164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2011.01002.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Rosenkrantz W. Practical applications of topical therapy for allergic, infectious, and seborrheic disorders. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 2006; 21: 106-16.
2. Guaguère E. Topical treatment of canine and feline pyoderma. Veterinary Dermatology 1996; 7: 145-51.
3. Hillier A, Alcorn JR, Cole LK et al. Pyoderma caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in dogs: 20 cases. Veterinary Dermatology 2006; 17: 432-9.
4. Loeffler A, Linek M, Moodley A et al. First report of multiresistant, mecA-positive Staphylococcus intermedius in Europe: 12 cases from a veterinary dermatology referral clinic in Germany. Veterinary Dermatology 2007; 18: 412-21.
5. Weese JS, Faires M, Rousseau J et al. Cluster of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in a small animal intensive care unit. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2007; 231: 1361-4.
6. Scott DW. Clinical assessment of topical benzoyl peroxide in treatment of canine skin diseases. Veterinary Medicine, Small Animal Clinician 1979; 74: 808-13.
7. Scott DW, Miller WH, Cayatte SM. A clinical study on the effect of 2 commercial veterinary benzoyl peroxide shampoos in dogs. Canine Practice 1994; 19: 7-10.
8. Ascher F, Maynard L, Laurent J et al. Controlled trial of ethyl lactate and benzoyl peroxide shampoos in the management of canine surface pyoderma and superficial pyoderma. In: von Tscharner C, Halliwell REW, eds. Advances in Veterinary Dermatology. London, Bailliere Tindall, 1990: 375-82.
9. Bond R, Rose JF, Ellis JW et al. Comparison of two shampoos for treatment of Malassezia pachydermatis associated seborrhoeic dermatitis in basset hounds. Journal of Small Animal Practice 1995; 36: 99-104.
10. Lloyd DH, Lamport AI. Activity of chlorhexidine shampoos in vitro against Staphylococcus intermedius, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Malassezia pachydermatis. Veterinary Record 1999; 144: 536-7.
11. Murayama N, Nagata M, Terada Y et al. Efficacy of a surgical scrub including 2% chlorhexidine acetate for canine superficial pyoderma. Veterinary Dermatology 2010; 21: 586-92.
12. Perrins N, Bond R. Synergistic inhibition of the growth in vitro of Microsporum canis by miconazole and chlorhexidine. Veterinary Dermatology 2003; 14: 99-102.
13. Codd JE, Deasy PB. Synergistic antifungal interaction between miconazole nitrate and chlorhexidine acetate. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1998; 173: 3-11.
14. Prottey C, George D, Leech RW et al. The mode of action of ethyl lactate as a treatment for acne. British Journal of Dermatology 1984; 110: 475-85.
15. Swinney A, Fazakerley J, McEwan N et al. Comparative in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of commercial ear cleaners. Veterinary Dermatology 2008; 19: 373-9.
16. Odore R, Valle VC, Re G. Efficacy of chlorhexidine against some strains of cultured and clinically isolated microorganisms. Veterinary Research Communications 2000; 24: 229-38.
17. Guardabassi L, Fondati A. Prudent and rational use of antibiotics for treatment of canine and feline pyoderma. Veterinaria 2009; 23: 11-22.
18. Nakahara H, Kozukue H. Isolation of chlorhexidine-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from clinical lesions. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1982; 15: 166-8.
19. Vali L, Davies SE, Lai LLG et al. Frequency of biocide resistance genes, antibiotic resistance and the effect of chlorhexidine exposure on clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008; 61: 524-32.
20. Meyer B, Cookson B. Does microbial resistance or adaptation to biocides create a hazard in infection prevention and control? Journal of Hospital Infection 2010; 76: 200-5.
21. Lboutounne H, Chaulet JF, Ploton C et al. Sustained ex vivo skin antiseptic activity of chlorhexidine in poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanocapsule encapsulated form and as a digluconate. Journal of Controlled Release 2002; 82: 319-34.
22. Pedersen K, Jensen H, Finster K et al. Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from diagnostic samples from dogs. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007; 60: 775-81.
23. Gupta AK, Kohli Y, Li A et al. In vitro susceptibility of the seven Malassezia species to ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole and terbinafine. British Journal of Dermatology 2000; 142: 758-65.
24. Moodley A, Stegger M, Bagcigil AF et al. spa typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from domestic animals and veterinary staff in the UK and Ireland. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006; 58: 1118-23.
25. Perreten V, Kadlec K, Schwarz S et al. Clonal spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in Europe and North America: an international multicentre study. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2010; 65: 1145-54.
26. Guardabassi L, Ghibaudo G, Damborg P. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a commercial ear antiseptic containing chlorhexidine and Tris-EDTA. Veterinary Dermatology 2010; 21: 282-6.