BOLD response to semantic and syntactic processing during hypoglycemia is load-dependent

Brain and Language

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-14

  Schafer, Robin J ^a,b   Page, Kathleen A ^c   Arora, Jagriti ^b   Sherwin, Robert ^b   Constable, R Todd ^b  

^a AAAS   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognition; Diabetes; FMRI; Hypoglycemia; Language comprehension; Processing load; Semantics; Syntax

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; GLUCAGON; GLUCOSE; GROWTH HORMONE; HYDROCORTISONE; INSULIN;

ADRENALIN BLOOD LEVEL; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HORMONE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOGLYCEMIA; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL FUNCTION; NERVOUS SYSTEM CONDUCTANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTIC PROCESSING; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BRAIN; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; GLUCOSE CLAMP TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LANGUAGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855350895     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. Anderson A.W., Heptulla R.A., Driesen N., Flanagan D., Goldberg P.A., Jones T.W., et al. Effects of hypoglycemia on human brain activation measured with fMRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2006, 24(6):693-697.
2. Astur R.S., Constable R.T. Hippocampal dampening during a relational memory task. Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 118(4):667-675.
3. Baddeley A. The concept of episodic memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 2001, 356(1413):1345-1350.
4. Baddeley A. Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders 2003, 36(3):189-208.
5. Bates E., Friederici A., Wulfeck B. Grammatical morphology in aphasia: Evidence from three languages. Cortex 1987, 23(4):545-574.
6. Belletti A., Rizzi L. Psych-verbs and theta-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1988, 6:291-352.
7. Bever T.G. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the development of language 1970, 279-362. Wiley, New York. J.R. Hayes (Ed.).
8. Binder J.R., Desai R.H., Graves W.W., Conant L.L. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19(12):2767-2796.
9. Bock K., Loebell H., Morey R. From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review 1992, 99(1):150-171.
10. Booth J.R., MacWhinney B., Harasaki Y. Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development 2000, 71(4):981-1003.
11. Booth J.R., Wood L., Lu D., Houk J.C., Bitan T. The role of the basal ganglia and cerebellum in language processing. Brain Research 2007, 1133(1):136-144.
12. Bunzeck, N., Dayan, P., Dolan, R. J., & Duzel, E. (2010). A common mechanism for adaptive scaling of reward and novelty. Human Brain Mapping.
13. Callicott J.H., Mattay V.S., Bertolino A., Finn K., Cuppola R., Frank J.A., et al. Physiological characteristics of capacity constraints in working memory as revealed by functional MRI. Cerebral Cortex 1999, 9:20-26.
14. Caplan D. Functional neuroimaging studies of syntactic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2001, 30:297-320.
15. Caplan D., Stanczak L., Waters G. Syntactic and thematic constraint effects on blood oxygenation level dependent signal correlates of comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20(4):643-656.
16. Caplan D., Waters G.S. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22(1):77-94. discussion 95-126.
17. Caramazza A., Shelton J. Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10:1-34.
18. Caramazza A., Zurif E.B. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language 1976, 3:572-582.
19. Carpenter P.A., Just M.A., Reichle E.D. Working memory and executive function: Evidence from neuroimaging. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2000, 10(2):195-199.
20. Chee M.W., Hon N.H., Caplan D., Lee H.L., Goh J. Frequency of concrete words modulates prefrontal activation during semantic judgments. Neuroimage 2002, 16(1):259-268.
21. Chee M.W., Hon N., Lee H.L., Soon C.S. Relative language proficiency modulates BOLD signal change when bilinguals perform semantic judgments. Blood oxygen level dependent. Neuroimage 2001, 13(6 Pt. 1):1155-1163.
22. Chee M.W., Lee H.L., Soon C.S., Westphal C., Venkatraman V. Reproducibility of the word frequency effect: Comparison of signal change and voxel counting. Neuroimage 2003, 18(2):468-482.
23. Chee M.W., Soon C.S., Lee H.L. Common and segregated neuronal networks for different languages revealed using functional magnetic resonance adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(1):85-97.
24. Chee M.W., Westphal C., Goh J., Graham S., Song A.W. Word frequency and subsequent memory effects studied using event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 2003, 20(2):1042-1051.
25. Chen E., West W.C., Waters G., Caplan D. Determinants of bold signal correlates of processing object-extracted relative clauses. Cortex 2006, 42(4):591-604.
26. Chenery H.J., Copland D.A., Murdoch B.E. Complex language functions and subcortical mechanisms: Evidence from Huntington's disease and patients with non-thalamic subcortical lesions. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2002, 37(4):459-474.
27. Clifton C. Tracing the course of sentence comprehension: How lexical information is used. Eye movements in visual cognition: Scene perception and reading 1992, 397-414. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. K. Rayner (Ed.).
28. Clifton C. Thematic roles in sentence parsing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993, 47(2):222-246.
29. Clifton C., Traxler M.J., Mohamed M.T., Williams R.S., Morris R.K., Rayner K. The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:317-334.
30. Cohen N.J., Ryan J., Hunt C., Romine L., Wszalek T., Nash C. Hippocampal system and declarative (relational) memory: Summarizing the data from functional neuroimaging studies. Hippocampus 1999, 9(1):83-98.
31. Comrie B. Language universals and linguistic typology 1981, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
32. Cox R.W. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research 1996, 29(3):162-173.
33. Cryer P.E. Hypoglycemia: The limiting factor in the management of diabetes. Diabetes 1994, 43:1378-1389.
34. Dapretto M., Bookheimer S.Y. Form and content: Dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron 1999, 24(2):427-432.
35. Davachi L. Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16(6):693-700.
36. de Villiers J., de Villiers P.A. The acquisition of English. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: The data 1985, Vol. 1:27-139. Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
37. Desimone R. Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1996, 93(24):13494-13499.
38. Devauchelle A.D., Oppenheim C., Rizzi L., Dehaene S., Pallier C. Sentence syntax and content in the human temporal lobe: An fMRI adaptation study in auditory and visual modalities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(5):1000-1012.
39. Dickey M.W., Thompson C.K. The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia: Evidence from on-line anomaly detection. Brain and Language 2004, 88(1):108-127.
40. Diessel H., Tomasello M. A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 2005, 81(4):1-25.
41. Dowty D. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 1991, 67(3):547-619.
42. Draelos M.T., Jacobson A.M., Weinger K., Widom B., Ryan C.M., Finkelstein D.M., et al. Cognitive function in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus during hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. American Journal of Medicine 1995, 98(2):135-144.
43. Driesen N.R., Goldberg P.A., Anderson A.W., Tang L., Flanagan D.E., Sherwin R.S., et al. Hypoglycemia reduces the blood-oxygenation level dependent signal in primary auditory and visual cortex: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience Research 2007, 85(3):575-582.
44. Eichenbaum H., Cohen N.J. From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain 2001, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
45. Evans J.L. Variability in comprehension strategy use in children with SLI: A dynamical systems account. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2002, 37(2):95-116.
46. Evans J.L., MacWhinney B. Sentence processing strategies in children with expressive and expressive-receptive specific language impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1999, 34(2):117-134.
47. Ferreira F. The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 47(2):164-203.
48. Fillmore J. The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory 1968, Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY. E. Bach, R. Harms (Eds.).
49. Frazier L., Clifton C. Construal 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
50. Friederici A.D., Kotz S.A. The brain basis of syntactic processes: Functional imaging and lesion studies. Neuroimage 2003, 20(Suppl. 1):S8-S17.
51. Friederici A.D., Ruschemeyer S.A., Hahne A., Fiebach C.J. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex 2003, 13(2):170-177.
52. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Poline J.B., Grasby P.J., Williams S.C., Frackowiak R.S., et al. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage 1995, 2(1):45-53.
53. Giovanello K.S., Schnyer D.M., Verfaellie M. A critical role for the anterior hippocampus in relational memory: Evidence from an fMRI study comparing associative and item recognition. Hippocampus 2004, 14(1):5-8.
54. Greenberg J. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of grammar 1966, 73-113. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. J. Greenberg (Ed.).
55. Grimshaw J. Argument structure 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
56. Grodzinsky Y. Theoretical perspectives on language disorders 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
57. Grodzinsky Y., Pinango M.M., Zurif E., Drai D. The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: Comprehension regularities in Broca's aphasia. Brain and Language 1999, 67(2):134-147.
58. Gruber J.S. Studies in lexical relations 1965, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA.
59. Hahne A., Friederici A.D. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 13(3):339-356.
60. Hasson U., Nusbaum H.C., Small S.L. Repetition suppression for spoken sentences and the effect of task demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(12):2013-2029.
61. Herriot P. The comprehension of active and passive sentences as a function of pragmatic expectations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1969, 8(2):166-169.
62. Holmes C.J., Hoge R., Collins L., Woods R., Toga A.W., Evans A.C. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1998, 22(2):324-333.
63. Holmes C.S., Koepke K.M., Thompson R.G., Gyves P.W., Weydert J.A. Verbal fluency and naming performance in type I diabetes at different blood glucose concentrations. Diabetes Care 1984, 7(5):454-459.
64. Humberstone, M. R., Simpson, L., Peters, A., Sawle, G. V., Macdonald, I. A., & Morris, P. G. (1998). FMRI of cognitive dysfunction during controlled hypoglycemia. In Proceedings of the 6th annual meeting of the international society for magnetic resonance in medicine (p. 1577).
65. Jackendoff R.S. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar 1972, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
66. Johnson M.K., Chalfonte B.L. Binding complex memories: The role of reactivation and the hippocampus. Memory systems 1994, 311-350. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D.L. Schacter, E. Tulving (Eds.).
67. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A., Keller T.A., Eddy W.F., Thulborn K.R. Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science 1996, 274(5284):114-116.
68. Kaan E., Stowe L.A. Storage and computation in sentence processing: A neuroimaging perspective. Storage and computation in the language faculty 2002, 257-295. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, F. Wijnen (Eds.).
69. Keenan E.L. Towards a universal definition of subject. Subject and topic 1976, 303-333. Academic Press, New York. C.N. Li (Ed.).
70. Keller T.A., Carpenter P.A., Just M.A. The neural bases of sentence comprehension: A fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cerebral Cortex 2001, 11(3):223-237.
71. Kemper S., Catlin J. On the role of semantic constraints in sentence comprehension. Language and Speech 1979, 22(3):253-267.
72. Kuperberg G.R., Kreher D.A., Sitnikova T., Caplan D.N., Holcomb P.J. The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language 2007, 100(3):223-237.
73. Kuperberg G.R., McGuire P.K., Bullmore E.T., Brammer M.J., Rabe-Hesketh S., Wright I.C., et al. Common and distinct neural substrates for pragmatic, semantic, and syntactic processing of spoken sentences: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(2):321-341.
74. Lake, J. K., Cardy, S., & Humphreys, K. R. (2010). Brief report: animacy and word order in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
75. Lempert H. Animacy constraints on preschool children's acquisition of syntax. Child Development 1989, 60(1):237-245.
76. Lobmann R., Smid H.G.O.M., Pottag G., Wagner K., Heinzee H.J., Lehnert H. Impairment and recovery of elementary cognitive function induced by hypoglycemia in type-1 diabetic patients and healthy controls. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000, 85:2758-2766.
77. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 1994, 101(4):676-703. (corrected).
78. Macwhinney B., Cohen J., Provost J. The PsyScope experiment-building system. Spatial Vision 1997, 11(1):99-101.
79. Mak W.M., Vonk W., Schriefers H. The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 47:50-68.
80. Manouilidou C., de Almeida R.G., Schwartz G., Nair N.P.V. Thematic roles in Alzheimer's disease: Hierarchy violations in psychological predicates. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2009, 22(2):167-186.
81. Manschot S.M., Brands A.M., van der Grond J., Kessels R.P., Algra A., Kappelle L.J., et al. Brain magnetic resonance imaging correlates of impaired cognition in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2006, 55(4):1106-1113.
82. McAulay V., Seckl J.R., Strachan M.W. Recurrent dizzy spells: All in the head!. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 2005, 42(Pt. 1):78-79.
83. McEwen B.S., Sapolsky R.M. Stress and cognitive function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1995, 5(2):205-216.
84. Meltzer J.A., Constable R.T. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates. Neuroimage 2005, 24:384-397.
85. Meltzer, J. A., McArdle, J. J., Schafer, R. J., & Braun, A. R. (2009). Neural aspects of sentence comprehension: Syntactic complexity, reversibility, and reanalysis. Cerebral Cortex.
86. Meltzer J.A., Negishi M., Constable R.T. Biphasic hemodynamic responses influence deactivation and may mask activation in block-design fMRI paradigms. Human Brain Mapping 2008, 29(4):385-399.
87. Miller E.K., Desimone R. Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. Science 1994, 263(5146):520-522.
88. Murdoch B.E. Subcortical brain mechanisms in speech and language. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopedica 2001, 53(5):233-251.
89. Musen G. Cognition and brain imaging in type 1 diabetes. Current Diabetes Reports 2008, 8(2):132-137.
90. Nakic M., Smith B.W., Busis S., Vythilingam M., Blair R.J. The impact of affect and frequency on lexical decision: The role of the amygdala and inferior frontal cortex. Neuroimage 2006, 31(4):1752-1761.
91. Newman S.D., Ikuta T., Burns T. The effect of semantic relatedness on syntactic analysis: An fMRI study. Brain and Language 2010, 113(2):51-58.
92. Newman S.D., Just M.A., Keller T.A., Roth J., Carpenter P.A. Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca's area. Brain Research 2003, 16(2):297-307.
93. Noppeney U., Phillips J., Price C. The neural areas that control the retrieval and selection of semantics. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(9):1269-1280.
94. Papademetris, X., Jackowski, M., Rajeevan, N., DiStasio, M., Okuda, H., Constable, R. T., et al. (2006). BioImage suite: An integrated medical image analysis suite: An update. In Paper presented at the SC/NA-MIC workshop on open science at 9th MICCAI conference, Copenhagen.
95. Papademetris X., Jackowski A.P., Schultz R.T., Staib L.H., Duncan J.S. Integrated intensity and point-feature nonrigid registration. Lecture notes in computer science 2004, 3216(Pt. 1):763-770.
96. Pramming S., Thorsteinsson B., Theilgaard A., Pinner E.M., Binder C. Cognitive function during hypoglycaemia in type I diabetes mellitus. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition) 1986, 292(6521):647-650.
97. Raichle, M. E., & Snyder, A. Z. (2007). A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage.
98. Raichle M.E., MacLeod A.M., Snyder A.Z., Powers W.J., Gusnard D.A., Shulman G.L. A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98(2):676-682.
99. Rappaport Hovav M., Levin B. Deconstructing thematic hierarchies. Architectures, rules, and preferences: Variations on themes by Joan W. Bresnan 2007, 385-402. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA. A. Zaenen, J. Simpson, T.H. King, J. Grimshaw, J. Maling, C. Manning (Eds.).
100. Rappaport M., Levin B. What to do with theta-roles. Syntax and semantics 21: Thematic relations 1988, Academic Press, New York, NY. W. Wilkins (Ed.).
101. Richardson F.M., Thomas M.S., Price C.J. Neuronal activation for semantically reversible sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(6):1283-1298.
102. Rosenthal J.M., Amiel S.A., Yaguez L., Bullmore E., Hopkins D., Evans M., et al. The effect of acute hypoglycemia on brain function and activation: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Diabetes 2001, 50(7):1618-1626.
103. Saffran E.M., Schwartz M.F., Linebarger M.C. Semantic influences on thematic role assignment: Evidence from normals and aphasics. Brain and Language 1998, 62(2):255-297.
104. Schafer, R. J., Rajeevan, N., Arora, J., Sherwin, R., & Constable, R. T. (2006). Differential memory resources for syntactic and semantic components of language processing. In Presented at the 12th international meeting of the organization for human brain mapping, June 11-15, 2006, Florence, Italy. NeuroImage, 31 (Suppl. 1).
105. Slobin D.I. Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1966, 5(3):219-227.
106. Smith C.N., Squire L.R. Medial temporal lobe activity during retrieval of semantic memory is related to the age of the memory. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29(4):930-938.
107. Sommerfield A.J., Deary I.J., McAulay V., Frier B.M. Moderate hypoglycemia impairs multiple memory functions in healthy adults. Neuropsychology 2003, 17(1):125-132.
108. Stowe L.A. Thematic structures and sentence comprehension. Linguistic structure in language processing 1989, 319-357. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. G.N. Carlson, M.K. Tanenhaus (Eds.).
109. Stowe L.A., Broere C.A., Paans A.M., Wijers A.A., Mulder G., Vaalburg W., et al. Localizing components of a complex task: Sentence processing and working memory. NeuroReport 1998, 9(13):2995-2999.
110. Teichmann M., Dupoux E., Kouider S., Bachoud-Levi A.C. The role of the striatum in processing language rules: Evidence from word perception in Huntington's disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(9):1555-1569.
111. Teichmann M., Dupoux E., Kouider S., Brugières P., Boissé M.F., Baudic S., et al. The role of the striatum in rule application: The model of Huntington's disease at early stage. Brain 2005, 128:1155-1167.
112. Traxler M.J., Morris R.K., Seely R.E. Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 47(1):69-90.
113. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Garnsey S.M. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 1994, 33(3):285-318.
114. Turner E.A., Rommetveit R. The acquisition of sentence voice and reversibility. Child Development 1967, 38(3):649-660.
115. Ullman M.T. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition 2004, 92(1-2):231-270.
116. Ullman M.T., Corkin S., Coppola M., Hickok G., Growdon J.H., Koroshetz W.J., et al. A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9(2):266-276.
117. Warren R.E., Frier B.M. Hypoglycaemia and cognitive function. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2005, 7:493-503.
118. Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1998). The interaction of noun animacy and grammatical role in the processing of object relative sequences. UCSD cognitive science tech report 98.01.
119. Weckerly J., Kutas M. An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology 1999, 36(5):559-570.
120. Wessels A.M., Simsek S., Remijnse P.L., Veltman D.J., Biessels G.J., Barkhof F., et al. Voxel-based morphometry demonstrates reduced grey matter density on brain MRI in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia 2006, 49(10):2474-2480.
121. Widom B., Simonson D.C. Glycemic control and neuropsychologic function during hypoglycemia in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Annals of Internal Medicine 1990, 112(12):904-912.
122. Williams E. Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1981, 1(1):81-114.
123. Wirsen A., Tallroth G., Lindgren M., Agardh C.D. Neuropsychological performance differs between type 1 diabetic and normal men during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. Diabetic Medicine 1992, 9(2):156-165.
124. Yamaguchi S., Hale L.A., D'Esposito M., Knight R.T. Rapid prefrontal-hippocampal habituation to novel events. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(23):5356-5363.