The good, the bad, and the ugly in mixed methods research and design

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 271-275

  Bergman, Manfred Max ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855278470     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689811433236     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Bergman M. M.Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2008:.
2. Bergman M.M.On concepts and paradigms in mixed methods research.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2010;4 (3): 171-175.
3. Bergman M.M.The politics, fashions, and conventions of research methods.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2011;5 (2): 99-102.
4. Creswell J.W.Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2008:.
5. Denzin N.K.The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago: Aldine; 1970:.
6. Jick T.D.Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1979;24:602-611.
7. Kelle U.Die Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden in der empirischen Sozialforschung: Theoretische Grundlagen und methodologische Konzepte. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2008:.
8. Morse J.M.,Niehaus L.Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2009:.
9. Smith H.W.Strategies of social research: The methodological imagination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1975:.
10. Tashakkori A.,Teddlie C.Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1998:.
11. Tashakkori A.,Teddlie C.SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2010:.