On concepts and paradigms in mixed methods research

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 171-175

  Bergman, Manfred Max ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954909028     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689810376950     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arminen, I. (2008). Scientific and "radical" ethnomethodology. From incompatible paradigms to ethnomethodological sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38, 167-191.
2. Bergman, M.M. (2008). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3. Catton, W.R., & Dunlap, R.E. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 15-47.
4. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6. Durkheim, E. (1898). Représentations individuelles et representations collectives. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.
7. Einstein, A. (1936). Physics and reality. Reprinted in A. Einstein (Ed.), Out of my later years. New York, NY: Philosophical Library.
8. Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (2008). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
9. Goddard, S.E., & Nexon, D.H. (2005). Paradigm lost? Reassessing theory of international politics. European Journal of International Relations, 11, 9-61.
10. Gow, J.I., & Dufour, C. (2000). Is the new public management a paradigm? Does it matter? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, 573-597.
11. Hassard, J. (1991). Multiple paradigms and organizational analysis. A case study. Organizational Studies, 12, 275-299.
12. Holland, R. (1990). The paradigm plague. Prevention, cure, and inoculation. Human Relations, 43, 34-48.
13. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Mazama, A. (2001). The Afrocentric paradigm: Contours and definitions. Journal of Black Studies, 31, 387-405.
15. Mertens, D.M. (2010). Philosophy in mixed methods teaching: The transformative paradigm as illustration. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4, 9-18.
16. Morgan, D.L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.
17. Moscovici, S. (1984). La psychologie sociale. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.
18. Phillips, D.L. (1973). Paradigms, falsification, and sociology. Acta Sociologica, 16, 13-30.
19. Powers, B.A., & Knapp, T.R. (1990). A dictionary of nursing theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
20. Saguy, A.C., & Stuart, F. (2008). Culture and law: Beyond a paradigm of cause and effect. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619, 149-164.
21. Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.