Urban fluvial flood modelling using a two-dimensional diffusion-wave treatment, part 1: Mesh resolution effects

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1541-1565

  Yu, D ^a   Lane, S N ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fluvial flood inundation modelling; Raster based modelling; Spatial resolution; Two dimensional diffusion wave; Urban areas; Wetting and drying

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; STREAM FLOW; WATER LEVELS;

FLUVIAL FLOOD; INUNDATION MODELLING; RASTER-BASED MODELLING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL DIFFUSION WAVE; URBAN AREAS;

FLOODS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; FLOODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; STREAM FLOW; WATER LEVELS;

FLOOD ROUTING; FLUVIAL PROCESS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA;

EID: 33646017402     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5935     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bates PD. 2000. Development and testing of a sub grid-scale model for moving-boundary hydrodynamic problems in shallow water. Hydrological Processes 14: 2073-2088.
2. Bates PD, Anderson MG. 1996. A preliminary investigation into the impact of initial conditions on flood inundation predictions using a time/space distributed sensitivity analysis. Catena 26(2): 115-134.
3. Bates PD, De Roo APJ. 2000. A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. Journal of Hydrology 236: 54-57.
4. Bates PD, Anderson MG, Baird L, Walling DE, Simm, D. 1992. Modelling floodplain flows using a two-dimensional finite element model. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 17: 575-588.
5. Bates PD, Anderson MG, Hervouet J-M. 1995. Initial comparison of two 2-dimensional finite element codes for river flood simulation. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Water, Maritime and Energy 112: 238-248.
6. Bechteler W, Hartmaan S, Otto AJ. 1994. Coupling of 2D and 1D models and integration into geographic information systems (GIS). In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on River Flood Hydraulics, White WR, Watts J (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 155-165.
7. Biggin DS, Blyth K. 1996. A comparison of ERS-1 satellite radar and aerial photography for river flood mapping. Journal of the Chartered Institute of Water and Environmental Management 10: 59-64.
8. Bishop Y, Fienberg S, Holland P. 1975. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
9. Brackett RA, Arvidson RE, Izenberg NR, Saatchi SS. 1995. Use of polarmetric and interferometric radar data for flood routing models: first results for the Missouri River. In Session 36 - Planetary Geology: Radar Remote Sensing of Flood Plains, Mountain Belts, and Volcanoes. Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America, 5-9 November, New Orleans.
10. Bradbrook KF, Lane SN, Waller SG, Bates PD. 2004. Two dimensional diffusion wave modelling of flood inundation using a simplified channel representation. International Journal of River Basin Management 3: 1-13.
11. Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW. 1988. Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill: New York.
12. Cohen J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 37-40.
13. Congalton RG, Green K. 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practice. Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton.
14. Courant R, Friedrichs KO. 1948. Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves. InterScience Publishers: New York.
15. Cunge JA, Holly Jr FM, Verwey A. 1976. Practical Aspects of Computational River Hydraulics. Pitman: London.
16. Defina A, D'Alpaos L, Matticchio B. 1994. A new set of equations for very shallow water and partially dry areas suitable to 2D numerical models. In Modelling Flood Propagation over Initially Dry Areas, Molinaro P, Natale L (eds). American Society of Civil Engineers: New York; 72-81.
17. Estrela T, Quintas L. 1994. Use of GIS in the modelling of flows on floodplains. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on River Flood Hydraulics, White WR (ed.). Wiley: Chichester; 177-189.
18. Everitt BS. 1998. The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
19. Flood M, Gutelius B. 1997. Commercial implications of topographic terrain mapping using scanning airborne laser radar. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63: 327-366.
20. Galland JC, Goutal N, Hervouet J-M. 1991. TELEMAC - a new numerical model for solving shall-water equations. Advances in Water Resources 14(3): 138-148.
21. Gee DM, Anderson MG, Baird L. 1990. Large scale floodplain modelling. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 15: 512-523.
22. Horritt MS. 2000. Calibration of a two-dimensional finite element flood flow model using satellite radar imagery. Water Resources Research 36(11): 3279-3291.
23. Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2001a. Effects of spatial resolution on a raster based model of flood flow. Journal of Hydrology 253: 239-249.
24. Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2001b. Predicting floodplain inundation: raster-based modelling versus the finite-element approach. Hydrological processes 15: 825-842.
25. Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2002. Evaluation of a 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology 268: 87-99.
26. Knight DW, Shiono K. 1996. River channel and floodplain hydraulics. In Floodplain Processes, Anderson MG, Walling DE, Bates PD (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 139-181.
27. Krabill WB, Collins JG, Link LE, Swift RN, Butler ML. 1984. Airborne laser topographic mapping results. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 50: 685-694.
28. Lane SN. 1998. Hydraulic modelling in hydrology and geomorphology: a review of high resolution approaches. Hydrological Processes 12: 1131-1150.
29. Lane SN. 2000. The measurement of river channel morphology. Photogrammetric Record 16: 937-961.
30. Lane SN, Richards KS. 1998. Two-dimensional modelling of flow processes in a multi-thread channel. Hydrological Processes 12: 1279-1298.
31. Lane SN, Richards KS. 2001. The 'validation' of hydrodynamic models: some critical perspectives. In Model Validation for Hydrological and Hydraulic Research, Bates PD, Anderson MG (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 413-438.
32. Lane SN, Bradbrook KF, Richards KS, Biron PM, Roy AG. 1999. The application of computational fluid dynamics to natural river channels: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional approaches. Geomorphology 29: 1-20.
33. Lane SN, James TD, Crowell MD. 2000. The application of digital photogrammetry to complex topography for geomorphological research. Photogrammetric Record 32: 793-821.
34. Lane SN, James T, Pritchard H, Saunders M. 2003. Photogrammetric and laser altimetric reconstruction of water levels for extreme flood event analysis. Photogrammetric Record 18: 293-307.
35. Lane SN, Hardy RJ, Ingham DB, Elliott DB. 2004. Numerical modelling of flow processes over gravelly-surfaces using structured grids and a numerical porosity treatment. Water Resources Research 40: W01302. DOI: 10.1029/2002WR001934.
36. Marks KJ, Bates PD. 2000. Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrological Processes 14: 2109-2122.
37. Mason DC, Cobby DM, Horritt MS, Bates PD. 2003. Floodplain friction parameterization in two-dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrological Processes 17: 1711-1732.
38. Westaway RM, Lane SN, Hicks DM. 2001. Airborne remote sensing of clear water, shallow, gravel-bed rivers using digital photogrammetry and image analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67: 1271-1281.
39. Westaway RM, Lane SN, Hicks DM. 2003. Remote survey of large-scale braided rivers using digital photogrammetry and image analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24: 795-816.
40. Wheater HS. 2002. Progress in and prospects for fluvial flood modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 360(1796): 1409-1431.