The study of effectiveness of blended learning approach for medical training courses

Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Karamizadeh, Z ^a   Zarifsanayei, N ^a   Faghihi, A A ^a   Mohammadi, H ^a   Habibi, M ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Efficacy; Medical students

Indexed keywords

AMBIGUOUS GENITALIA; ARTICLE; CONGENITAL ADRENAL HYPERPLASIA; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; LEARNING STYLE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; NETWORK LEARNING; PRETEST POSTTEST DESIGN; QUESTIONNAIRE; STUDENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 84855262921     PISSN: 20741804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Valiathan P. Designing a Blended learning Solution. Instructional Design Expert, NIIT Ltd; 2008. Available from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/2261631/Designing-a-Blended-Learning-Solution-What-is-Blended-Learning
2. Neumeier P. A closer look at blended learning-parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL 2005;17:163-78. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344005000224]
3. Derntl M, Motschnig-Pitrik R. Patterns for blended, person-centered learning: strategy, concepts, experiences and evaluation. ACM New York, NY, USA; 2004. p. 916-923.
4. Marsh GE II, McFadden AC, Price BJ. Blended instruction: adapting conventional instruction for large classes. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration; 2003 [cited 2005 Nov 22]; 2003. Available from: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter64/marsh64.htm
5. Singh H. Building effective blended learning programmes. Educ Technol 2003;43:51-4.
6. Greenhalgh T. Computer-assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ 2001;322:40-4. [111 41156] [http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7277.40]
7. Hudson JN. Computer-aided learning in the real world of medical education: does the quality of interaction with the computer affect student learning? Med Educ 2004; 38:887-95. 15271050] [http://dx.doi.95. [15271050] [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01892.x]
8. Taradi SK, Taradi M, Radic K, Pokrajac N. Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 2005;29:35-9. [157183 81] [http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00026.2004]
9. Chandra V. The impact of a Blended Web- based learning environment on perception, attitudes, and performance of boys and girls in Junior Science and Senior Physics. [dissertation]. Crtin university of Technology; October 2004.
10. Pereira JA, Pleguezuelos E, Merí A, Molina-Ros A, Molina-Tomás MC, Masdeu C. Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy. Med Educ 2007;41:189-95. [17 269953] [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02672.x]
11. Moore JC. The sloan consortium quality framework and the five pillars. The Sloan Consortium; 2005, Available from:http://www.aln.org/publications/books/qualityframework.pdf.
12. Boettcher JV. Ten Core Principles for Designing Effective Learning Environments: Insights from Brain Research and Pedagogical Theory. Innovate Journal of Online education; 2007, Innovate 3(3). Available from: http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php
13. Kompes G, Kaminski J. Readiness for eLearning. Available from: http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art45966.asp
14. Watkins R. Preparing E-Learners for Online Success; 2005. Available from: http://www.astd.org/LC/2005/0905_watkins.htm