Response of three Athens metro underground structures in the 1999 Parnitha earthquake

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 7-10, 2005, Pages 617-633

  Gazetas, G ^a   Gerolymos, N ^a   Anastasopoulos, I ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Anchored pile wall; Cut and cover station; Earth pressures; Seismic analysis; Seismic observation; Seismic response; Soil tunnel interaction; Underground structures

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; SEISMOGRAPHS; SEISMOLOGY; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES;

ANCHORED PILE WALL; CUT-AND-COVER STATION; SEISMIC ANALYSIS; SEISMIC OBSERVATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE;

METRO SYSTEM; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

ATHENS [ATTICA]; ATTICA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GREECE; SOUTHERN EUROPE; WORLD;

EID: 24644450575     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. International society for the prevention and mitigation of natural hazards Catastrophic Athens (Greece) earthquake of 7 September 1999: An unexpected event in a low seismicity region Special issue of Natural Hazards vol. 27(1-2) 2002 p. 1-199
2. Rondogianni Th, Mettos A, Galanakis D, Georgiou Ch. The Athens earthquake of September 7, 1999: Its setting and effects. Annales Geologiques des pays Helleniques, 1e Serie, T. XXXVIII, Fasc. B; 2000. p. 131-44.
3. Gazetas G. Analytical and experimental estimation of the ground motions in the meizoseismal region of the Athens 7-9-99 earthquake. Research report, National Technical University, vol. 1-3; 2001.
4. R. Dobry R.D. Borcherd C.B. Crouse I.M. Idriss W.B. Joyner G.R. Martin et al. New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions Earthquake Spectra 16 1 2000
5. S 5.9 Parnitha (Athens) earthquake: The case of Adames Nat Hazards 27 2002 133-169
6. I. Anastasopoulos G. Gazetas P. Psarropoulos Flexible retaining walls: why they do not often fail in strong seismic shaking? Proceedings of the fib symposium on concrete structures in seismic regions, Athens 2003
7. Gazetas G., Psarropoulos P., Anastasopoulos I., Gerolymos N. Seismic behaviour of flexible retaining systems to short-duration moderately strong excitation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng; 24:537-50.
8. H. Iida T. Hiroto N. Yoshida M. Iwafuji Damage to Daikai subway station Soils Found 1996 283-300 [Special issue]
9. T. Matsuda S. Samata T. Iwatate Seismic response analysis for a collapsed underground subway structure with intermediate columns The 1995 Hyogoken-Nabu earthquake - investigation into damage to civil engineering structure 1996 Japan Society of Civil Engineers Japan p. 277-85
10. Ministry of Public Works. Regulatory guide E39/93 for the seismic analysis of bridges. Bull Tech Chamber Greece, Issue No. 2040, 1998.
11. H.B. Seed R.V. Whitman Design of earth retaining structures for dynamic loads Proceedings of the specialty conference on lateral stresses in the ground and design of earth retaining structures, ASCE 1970 p. 103-47
12. A.S. Veletsos A.H. Younan Dynamic response of cantilever retaining walls J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 123 1997 161-172
13. A.S. Veletsos A.H. Younan Dynamic soil pressures on rigid vertical walls J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, New York 23 1994 275-301