Measuring influence of accessibility on accident severity with structural equation modeling

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2236, 2011, Pages 1-10

  Kim, Karl ^a   Pant, Pradip ^a   Yamashita, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FACTOR ANALYSIS; HIGHWAY ACCIDENTS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

ACCIDENT SEVERITY; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; CRASH SEVERITY; LATENT FACTOR; MEASUREMENT MODEL; MULTIVARIATE TECHNIQUES; PATH ANALYSIS; SAFETY RESEARCH; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; TRAFFIC SAFETY;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84855213923     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2236-01     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Derrig, R. A., M. Segui-Gomez, A. Abtahi, and L. L. Liu. The Effect of Population Safety Belt Usage Rates on Motor Vehicle-Related Fatalities. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002, pp. 101-110. (Pubitemid 32951190)
2. Hijar, M., C. Carrillo, M. Flores, R. Anaya, and V. Lopez. Risk Factors in Highway Traffic Accidents: A Case Control Study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2000, pp. 703-709.
3. Norris, F. H., B. A. Matthews, and J. K. Riad. Characterological, Situational, and Behavioral Risk Factors for Motor Vehicle Accidents: A Prospective Examination. Accident Analysis Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2000, pp. 505-515.
4. Valent, F., F. Schiava, C. Savonitto, T. Gallo, S. Brusaferro, and F. Barbone. Risk Factors for Fatal Road Traffic Accidents in Udine, Italy. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002, pp. 71-84. (Pubitemid 32951187)
5. Massie, D. L., K. L. Campbell, and A. F. Williams. Traffic Accident Involvement Rates by Driver Age and Gender. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1995, pp. 73-87.
6. Zhang, J., J. Lindsay, K. Clarke, G. Robbins, and Y. Mao. Factors Affecting the Severity of Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes Involving Elderly Drivers in Ontario. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2000, pp. 117-125.
7. Kim, K., and E. Yamashita. Motor Vehicle Crashes and Land Use: Empirical Analysis from Hawaii. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 73-79.
8. Levine, N., K. E. Kim, and L. H. Nitz. Spatial Analysis of Honolulu Motor Vehicle Crashes: I. Spatial Patterns. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1995, pp. 663-674.
9. Levine, N., K. E. Kim, and L. H. Nitz. Spatial Analysis of Honolulu Motor Vehicle Crashes: II. Zonal Generators. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1995, pp. 675-685.
10. Sathisan, S. K., and N. Srinivasan. Evaluation of Accessibility of Urban Transportation Networks. In Transportation Research Record 1617, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 78-83. (Pubitemid 128553697)
11. Mondschein, A., S. Brumbaugh, and B. D. Taylor. Congestion and Accessibility: What's the Relationship? Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
12. Pirie, G. H. Measuring Accessibility: A Review and Proposal. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1978, pp. 299-312.
13. Kitamura, R., T. Akiymama, T. Yamamoto, and T. F. Golob. Accessibility in a Metropolis: Toward a Better Understanding of Land Use and Travel. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 64-75. (Pubitemid 34291489)
14. Levinson, D. M. Accessibility and the Journey to Work. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1998, pp. 11-21.
15. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87-114.
16. Nowakowska, M. Logistic Models in Crash Severity Classification Based on Road Characteristics. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2148, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 16-26. 10 Transportation Research Record 2236
17. Memon, A. Q. Road Accident Prediction Models and Influence of Traffic Flow, Road Length, Road Class, and Vehicle Class on Accidents. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
18. Sathisan, S. K., and N. Srinivasan. Evaluation of Accessibility of Urban Transportation Networks. In Transportation Research Record 1617, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 78-83. (Pubitemid 128553697)
19. Kim, K., P. Pant, and E. Yamashita. Accidents and Accessibility: Measuring the Influences of Demographic and Land Use Variables in Honolulu, Hawaii. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2147, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 9-17.
20. Golob, T. F. Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Choice Dynamics. Transportation Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1988.
21. Golob, T. F. Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Behavior Research. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine, 2001.
22. Lee, J., J. Chung, and B. Son. Analysis of Traffic Accident Size for Korean Highway Using Structural Equation Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, 2008, pp. 1955-1963.
23. Foster, J., E. Barkus, and C. Yavorsky. Understanding and Using Advanced Statistics. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2006.
24. Kim, K., P. R. Pant, and E. I. Yamashita. Hit-and-Run Crashes: Using Rough Set Analysis with Logistic Regression to Capture Critical Attributes and Determinants. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 114-121.
25. Levine, N., and K. Kim. The Location of Motor Vehicle Crashes in Honolulu: A Methodology for Geocoding Intersections. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1998, pp. 557-576. (Pubitemid 29260931)
26. Kline, R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed. Guilford Press, New York, 2005.
27. Byrne, B. M. Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, 2nd ed. Routledge, New York, 2010.
28. Arbuckle, J. L. AMOS 18 User's Guide. Amos Development Corporation, Crawfordville, Fla., 2009.
29. Hatcher, L. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, 1st ed. SAS Publishing, Cary, N.C., 1994.
30. Anderson, J. C., and D. W. Gerbing. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, No. 3, 1988, pp. 411-423.
31. Dion, P. A. Interpreting Structural Equation Modeling Results: A Reply to Martin and Cullen. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 83, 2008, pp. 365-368.
32. Mussone, L., and K. Kim. The Analysis of Motor Vehicle Crash Clusters Using the Vector Quantization Technique. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2010, pp. 162-175.
33. Kim, K., L. Nitz, J. Richardson, and L. Li. Personal and Behavioral Predictors of Automobile Crash and Injury Severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, 1995, pp. 469-481.