Clinical evaluation of the L80 autorefractometer

Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 66-71

  Shneor, Einat ^a   Millodot, Michel ^b   Avraham, Ortal ^a   Amar, Shany ^a   Gordon Shaag, Ariela ^a  

^a Hadassah Academic College   (Israel)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Autorefractor; Repeatability; Subjective refraction; Validity

Indexed keywords

ABERROMETRY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MYOPIA; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ABERROMETRY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUTOMATION; CORNEA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855195708     PISSN: 08164622     EISSN: 14440938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00644.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rassow B, Wesemann W. Automatic infrared refractors. Ophthalmology 1984; 91: 10-26.
2. Wood MG, Mazow ML, Prager TC. Accuracy of the Nidek ARK900 objective refractor in comparison with retinoscopy in children ages 3 to 18years. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 126: 100-108.
3. McBrien NA, Adams DW. A longitudinal investigation of adult-onset and adult progression of myopia in an occupational group. Refractive and biometric findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 321-333.
4. Salchow DJ, Zirm ME, Stieldorf C, Parisi A. Comparison of objective and subjective refraction before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 827-835.
5. Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Tsujimura S. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 101-107.
6. Bannon RE. A new automated subjective optometer. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977; 54: 433-438.
7. Dyson C. A clinical study of the autorefractor, an antomatic refracting device. Can J Ophthalmol 1977; 12: 29-33.
8. Pappas CJ, Anderson DR, Briese FW. Is the Autorefractor reading closest to manifest refraction? A comparison of the patient's previous spectacles and the 6600 Autorefractor reading. Arch Ophthalmol 1978; 96: 997-998.
9. Wood ICJ, Papas E, Burghardt D, Hardwick G. A clinical evaluation of the Nidek Autorefractor. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1984; 4: 169-178.
10. McBrien NA, Millodot M. Clinical evaluation of the Canon Autoref R-1. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62: 786-792.
11. McCaghrey GE, Matthews FE. Clinical evaluation of a range of autorefractors. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993; 13: 129-137.
12. Kinge B, Midelfart A, Jacobsen G. Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR1000 autorefractor. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 35-39.
13. Elliott M, Simpson T, Richter D, Fonn D. Repeatability and accuracy of automated refraction: a comparison of the NikonNRK-8000, the Nidek AR-1000 and subjective refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 434-438.
14. Bullimore MA, Fusaro RE, Adams CW. The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 617-622.
15. Davies LN, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 320-324.
16. Cleary G, Spalton DJ, Patel PM, Lin PF, Marshall J. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009; 29: 173-181.
17. Sheppard L, Davies LN. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010; 30: 143-151.
18. Strang NC, Gray LS, Winn B, Pugh JR. Clinical evaluation of patient tolerance to autorefractor prescriptions. Clin Exp Optom 1998; 81: 112-118.
19. Hament WJ, Nabar VA, Nuijts RM. Repeatability and validity of Zywave aberrometer measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 2135-2141.
20. Salmon TO, West RW, Gasser W, Kenmore T. Measurement of refractive errors in young myopes using the COAS Shack-Hartmann Aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 6-14.
21. Rodríguez P, Navarro R, González L, Hernández JL. Accuracy and reproducibility of Zywave, Tracey, and experimental aberrometers. J Refract Surg 2004; 20: 810-817.
22. Dobos MJ, Twa MD, Bullimore MA. An evaluation of the Bausch & Lomb Zywave aberrometer. Clin Exp Optom 2009; 92: 238-245.
23. Wolffsohn JS, O'Donnell C, Charman WN, Gilmartin B. Simultaneous continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the modified Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 142-147.
24. Win-Hall DM, Ostrin LA, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 879-887.
25. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 367-375.
26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
27. Rosenfield M, Logan N. Optometry: Science Techniques and Clinical Management. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2009. p 195.
28. Mirshahi A, Bühren J, Gerhardt D, Kohnen T. In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 2295-2301.