Determining the evolutionary history of gene families

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 48-55

  Ames, Ryan M ^a   Money, Daniel ^a   Ghatge, Vikramsinh P ^a   Whelan, Simon ^a   Lovell, Simon C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA; GENETICS; GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, INSECT; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC;

EID: 84855186057     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr592     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adams, M. et al. (2000) The Genome Sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 287, 2185-2195.
2. Akerborg, O. et al. (2009) Simultaneous Bayesian gene tree reconstruction and reconciliation analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 5714-5719.
3. Altschul, S. et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403-410.
4. Ames, R.M. et al. (2010) Gene duplication and environmental adaptation within yeast populations. Genome Biol. Evol., 2, 591-601.
5. Cai, J. et al. (2008) De novo origination of a new protein-coding gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 179, 487-496.
6. Chen, K. et al. (2000) NOTUNG: a program for dating gene duplications and optimizing gene family trees. J. Comput. Biol., 7, 429-447.
7. Clark, A. et al. (2007) Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny. Nature, 450, 203-218.
8. Conant, G. andWagner, A. (2002) GenomeHistory: a software tool and its application to fully sequenced genomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 3378-3386.
9. Csuros, M. (2008) Ancestral reconstruction by asymmetric wagner parsimony over continuous characters and squared parsimony over distributions. In Comparative Genomics: International Workshop, RECOMB-CG 2008, Paris, France, October 13-15, 2008, Proceedings. vol. 5267. Springer, New York, pp. 72-78.
10. Csuros, M. (2010) Count: evolutionary analysis of phylogenetic profiles with parsimony and likelihood. Bioinformatics, 26, 1910-1912.
11. Csuros, M. and Miklos, I. (2006) A probabilistic model for gene content evolution with duplication, loss, and horizontal transfer. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 3909, 206-220.
12. De Bie, T. et al. (2006) CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution. Bioinformatics, 22, 1269-1271.
13. Dopman, E. and Hartl, D. (2007)Aportrait of copy-number polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 19920-19925.
14. Egan, C. et al. (2007) Recurrent DNA copy number variation in the laboratory mouse. Nat. Genet., 39, 1384-1389.
15. Emerson, J. et al. (2008) Natural selection shapes genome-wide patterns of copy-number polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 320, 1629-1631.
16. Felsenstein, J. (1978) Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Biol., 27, 401-410.
17. Felsenstein, J. (1992) Phylogenies from restriction sites: a maximum-likelihood approach. Evolution, 46, 159-173.
18. Felsenstein, J. (2004) Inferring Phytogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
19. Glessner, J. et al. (2009) Autism genome-wide copy number variation reveals ubiquitin and neuronal genes. Nature, 459, 569-573.
20. Hahn, M. (2007) Bias in phylogenetic tree reconciliation methods: implications for vertebrate genome evolution. Genome Biol., 8, R141-R149.
21. Hahn, M. et al. (2005) Estimating the tempo and mode of gene family evolution from comparative genomic data. Genome Res., 15, 1153-1160.
22. Hahn, M. et al. (2007) Gene family evolution across 12 Drosophila genomes. PLoS Genet., 3, e197-e209.
23. Hakes, L. et al. (2007) All duplicates are not equal: the difference between small-scale and genome duplication. Genome Biol., 8, R209-R222.
24. Heger, A. and Ponting, C. (2007) Evolutionary rate analyses of orthologs and paralogs from 12 Drosophila genomes. Genome Res., 17, 1837.
25. Iwasaki, W. and Takagi, T. (2007) Reconstruction of highly heterogeneous gene-content evolution across the three domains of life. Bioinformatics, 23, i230-i239.
26. Karev, G. et al. (2002) Birth and death of protein domains: a simple model of evolution explains power law behavior. BMC Evol. Biol., 2, 18-34.
27. Knowles, D. and McLysaght, A. (2009) Recent de novo origin of human protein-coding genes. Genome Res., 19, 1752-1759.
28. Korbel, J. et al. (2008) The current excitement about copy-number variation: how it relates to gene duplications and protein families. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 18, 366-374.
29. Liti, G. et al. (2009) Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature, 458, 337-341.
30. Lupski, J. (2007) Genomic rearrangements and sporadic disease. Nat. Genet., 39, S43-S47.
31. Lynch, M. and Conery, J. (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science, 290, 1151-1155.
32. Lynch, M. and Conery, J. (2003) The evolutionary demography of duplicate genes. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics, 3, 35-44.
33. Mayrose, I. et al. (2010) Probabilistic models of chromosome number evolution and the inference of polyploidy. Syst. Biol., 59, 132-144.
34. Mills, R.E. et al. (2011) Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing. Nature, 470, 59-65.
35. Nair, S. et al. (2008) Adaptive copy number evolution in malaria parasites. PLoS Genet., 4, e1000243-e1000253.
36. Ohno, S. (1970) Evolution by Gene Duplication. Springer, New York.
37. Page, R. (1998) GeneTree: comparing gene and species phylogenies using reconciled trees. Bioinformatics, 14, 819-820.
38. Perry, G. et al. (2007) Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nat. Genet., 39, 1256-1260.
39. Pollard, D. et al. (2006) Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: evidence for incomplete lineage sorting. PLoS Genet., 2, 1634-1647.
40. Pupko, T. et al. (2000) A fast algorithm for joint reconstruction of ancestral amino acid sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol., 17, 890-896.
41. Pupko, T. et al. (2002) A branch-and-bound algorithm for the inference of ancestral amino-acid sequences when the replacement rate varies among sites: application to the evolution of five gene families. Bioinformatics, 18, 1116-1123.
42. Redon, R. et al. (2006) Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature, 444, 444-454.
43. Richards, S. et al. (2005) Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution. Genome Res., 15, 1-18.
44. Sanderson, M. et al. (1994) TreeBASE: a prototype database of phylogenetic analyses and an interactive tool for browsing the phylogeny of life. Am. J. Botany, 81, 183-187.
45. Sankoff, D. (1975) Minimal mutation trees of sequences. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 28, 35-42.
46. Sankoff, D. and Rousseau, P. (1975) Locating the vertices of a steiner tree in an arbitrary metric space. Math. Program., 9, 240-246.
47. Spencer, M. et al. (2006) Modelling prokaryote gene content. Evol. Bioinform Online, 2, 157-78.
48. Sudmant, P.H. et al. (2010) Diversity of human copy number variation and multicopy genes. Science, 330, 641-646.
49. Tofigh, A. et al. (2010) Simultaneous identification of duplications and lateral gene transfers. IEEE IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinformatics, 8, 517-535.
50. Turner, D. et al. (2007) Germline rates of de novo meiotic deletions and duplications causing s everal genomic disorders., 90-95.
51. Yang, Z. (1993) Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from dna sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol., 10, 1396-1401.
52. Yang, Z. (2006) Computational Molecular Evolution. Oxford University Press, USA.
53. Zhou, Q. et al. (2008) On the origin of new genes in Drosophila. Genome Res., 18, 1446-1455.