Assessment of coronary blood flow with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 582-590

  Schuleri, Karl H ^a   George, Richard T ^a   Lardo, Albert C ^a  

^a Department of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84755161299     PISSN: 10713581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-010-9257-8     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2508-14. (Pubitemid 44881213)
2. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F, Vollmar C, Nikolaou K, Becker C, et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: First clinical experiences. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1294-300.
3. Erdogan D, Yildirim I, Ciftci O, Ozer I, Caliskan M, Gullu H, et al. Effects of normal blood pressure, prehypertension, and hypertension on coronary microvascular function. Circulation 2007;115:593-9.
4. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ. CT angiography: An alternative to nuclear perfusion imaging. Heart 2008;94:255-7.
5. Salerno M, Beller GA. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:412-24.
6. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, Kitagawa K, Bluemke DA, Lima JA, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007;42:815-22.
7. George RT, Ichihara T, Lima JA, Lardo AC. A method for reconstructing the arterial input function during helical CT: Implications for myocardial perfusion distribution imaging. Radiology 2010;255:396-404.
8. Klein MA, Collier BD, Hellman RS, Bamrah VS. Detection of chronic coronary artery disease: Value of pharmacologically stressed, dynamically enhanced turbo-fast low-angle shot MR images. Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:257-63.
9. Verna E, Ceriani L, Provasoli S, Scotti S, Ghiringhelli S. Larger perfusion defects with exercise compared with dipyridamole SPECT (exercise-dipyridamole mismatch) may reflect differences in epicardial and microvascular coronary dysfunction: When the stressor matters. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:818-26.
10. Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE. Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:171-85.
11. Chang SM, Nabi E, Xu J, Raza U, Mahmarian JJ. Normal stressonly versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: Similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;55:221-30.
12. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, Kitagawa K, Chang HJ, Bluemke DA, et al. Adenosine stress 64-and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: A pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:174-82.
13. Wilke N, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, Huang Y, Christensen BV, Stillman AE, et al. Myocardial perfusion reserve: Assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 1997;204:373-84.
14. Fritz-Hansen T, Hove JD, Kofoed KF, Kelbaek H, Larsson HB. Quantification of MRI measured myocardial perfusion reserve in healthy humans: A comparison with positron emission tomography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:818-24.
15. Schaefer S, van Tyen R, Saloner D. Evaluation of myocardial perfusion abnormalities with gadolinium-enhanced snapshot MR imaging in humans. Radiology 1992;185:795-801.
16. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR. First-pass cardiac perfusion: Evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174:757-62.
17. Wilke N, Simm C, Zhang J, Ellermann J, Ya X, Merkle H, et al. Contrast-enhanced first pass myocardial perfusion imaging: Correlation between myocardial blood flow in dogs at rest and during hyperemia. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:485-97.
18. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC, Lombardi M, Al-Saadi N, Ahlstrom H, et al. MR-IMPACT: Comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2008;29:480-9.
19. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, Hettwer S, Schnackenburg B, Wegscheider K, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003;108:432-7.
20. Ishida N, Sakuma H, Motoyasu M, Okinaka T, Isaka N, Nakano T, et al. Noninfarcted myocardium: Correlation between dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial MR imaging and quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 2003;229:209-16.
21. Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur MR, Carlos RC. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: A metaanalysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1343-53.
22. Plein S, Ryf S, Schwitter J, Radjenovic A, Boesiger P, Kozerke S. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI accelerated with k-t sense. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:777-85.
23. Kellman P, Arai AE. Imaging sequences for first pass perfusion-A review. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:525-37.
24. Gerber BL, Raman SV, Nayak K, Epstein FH, Ferreira P, Axel L, et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: History, theory, and current state of the art. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:18.
25. Kraitchman DL, Wilke N, Hexeberg E, Jerosch-Herold M, Wang Y, Parrish TB, et al. Myocardial perfusion and function in dogs with moderate coronary stenosis. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:771-80.
26. Klocke FJ, Simonetti OP, Judd RM, Kim RJ, Harris KR, Hedjbeli S, et al. Limits of detection of regional differences in vasodilated flow in viable myocardium by first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. Circulation 2001;104:2412-6.
27. Lee DC, Johnson NP. Quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow by magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:761-70.
28. Ichihara T, Ishida M, Kitagawa K, Ichikawa Y, Natsume T, Yamaki N, et al. Quantitative analysis of first-pass contrast enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI using a Patlak plot method and blood saturation correction. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:373-83.
29. Jerosch-Herold M, Swingen C, Seethamraju RT. Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution. Med Phys 2002;29:886-97.
30. Wieben O, Francois C, Reeder SB. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: Potential and challenges. Eur J Radiol 2008;65:15-28.
31. Gutberlet M, Noeske R, Schwinge K, Freyhardt P, Felix R, Niendorf T. Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Feasibility and implications for clinical applications. Invest Radiol 2006;41:154-67.
32. Schuleri KH, Kitagawa K, Lautamäki R, Evers R, Bengel FM, Lardo AC. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla to quantify regional myocardial blood flow after myocardial infarction: Comparison with 13 N-ammonia positron emission tomography and microspheres. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10(A): 367.
33. Cheng AS, Pegg TJ, Karamitsos TD, Searle N, Jerosch-Herold M, Choudhury RP, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: A comparison with 1.5-tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2440-9.
34. Prasad SR, Jagirdar J. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis/nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy: A primer for radiologists. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008;32:1-3.
35. Mahesh M, Cody DD. Physics of cardiac imaging with multiplerow detector CT. Radiographics 2007;27:1495-509.
36. Rumberger JA, Feiring AJ, Lipton MJ, Higgins CB, Ell SR, Marcus ML. Use of ultrafast computed tomography to quantitate regional myocardial perfusion: A preliminary report. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:59-69.
37. Wolfkiel CJ, Ferguson JL, Chomka EV, Law WR, Labin IN, Tenzer ML, et al. Measurement of myocardial blood flow by ultrafast computed tomography. Circulation 1987;76:1262-73.
38. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, van der Lugt A, McFadden EP, Stijnen T, de Feyter PJ, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: Effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. Radiology 2005;236:661-5.
39. Canty JM Jr, Judd RM, Brody AS, Klocke FJ. First-pass entry of nonionic contrast agent into the myocardial extravascular space. Effects on radiographic estimates of transit time and blood volume. Circulation 1991;84:2071-8.
40. Schuleri KH, George RT, Lardo AC. Applications of cardiac multidetector CT beyond coronary angiography. Nat Rev Cardiol 2009;6:699-710.
41. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, Haraikawa T, Suzuki J, Shigematsu Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: Alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 2005;69:550-7.
42. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, DiPaula A, Thompson DR, McCarthy WF, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:153-60.
43. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, Lee YS, Bastarrika G, Chiaramida SA, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:318-26.
44. Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Butler J, Nomura CH, Ferencik M, et al. Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 2008;248:466-75.
45. Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Abbara S, Hoffmann U, et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: Contrastenhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 2008;247:49-56.
46. Kitagawa K, George RT, Zadeh A, Lima JAC, Lardo AC. Characterization and correction of beam hardening artifacts during dynamic volume computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 2010, in press.