Olfactory priming leads to faster sound localization

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 506, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 188-192

  La Buissonnière Ariza, Valérie ^a,b   Frasnelli, Johannes ^a   Collignon, Olivier ^a,b   Lepore, Franco ^a,b  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN NEUROPSYCHOLOGIE ET COGNITION   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory; Cross modal; Multisensory; Olfaction; Smell; Trigeminal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ODOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SMELLING; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; SOUND DETECTION; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SMELL; SOUND LOCALIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84655169193     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: 18727972     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Arzi A., Sela L., Green A., Givaty G., Dagan Y., Sobel N. The influence of odorants on respiratory patterns in sleep. Chem. Senses 2010, 35:31-40.
2. Bensafi M., Rouby C., Farget V., Vigouroux M., Holley A. Asymmetry of pleasant vs. unpleasant odor processing during affective judgment in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 2002, 328:309-313.
3. Boesveldt S., Frasnelli J., Gordon A.R., Lundstrom J.N. The fish is bad: negative food odors elicit faster and more accurate reactions than other odors. Biol. Psychol. 2010, 84:313-317.
4. Bouvet J.F., Delaleu J.C., Holley A. The activity of olfactory receptor cells is affected by acetylcholine and substance P. Neurosci. Res. 1988, 5:214-223.
5. Brand G. Olfactory/trigeminal interactions in nasal chemoreception. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2006, 30:908-917.
6. Brand G., Jacquot L. Sensitization and desensitization to allyl isothiocyanate (mustard oil) in the nasal cavity. Chem. Senses 2002, 27:593-598.
7. Cain W.S., Murphy C.L. Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation. Nature 1980, 284:255-257.
8. Cerf-Ducastel B., Van de Moortele P.F., MacLeod P., Le Bihan D., Faurion A. Interaction of gustatory and lingual somatosensory perceptions at the cortical level in the human: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Chem. Senses 2001, 26:371-383.
9. Collignon O., Charbonneau G., Lassonde M., Lepore F. Early visual deprivation alters multisensory processing in peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:3236-3243.
10. 2 oral pungency and taste. Perception 1987, 16:629-640.
11. Dematte M.L., Sanabria D., Spence C. Olfactory discrimination: when vision matters?. Chem. Senses 2009, 34:103-109.
12. Diederich A., Colonius H. Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time. Percept. Psychophys. 2004, 66:1388-1404.
13. Diederich A., Colonius H. Crossmodal interaction in speeded responses: time window of integration model. Prog. Brain Res. 2009, 174:119-135.
14. Djordjevic J., Zatorre R.J., Jones-Gotman M. Odor-induced changes in taste perception. Exp. Brain Res. 2004, 159:405-408.
15. Doty R.L., Brugger W.P.E., Jurs P.C., Orndorff M.A., Snyder P.J., Lowry L.D. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol. Behav. 1978, 20:175-185.
16. Frasnelli J., Albrecht J., Bryant B., Lundstrom J.N. Perception of specific trigeminal chemosensory agonists. Neuroscience 2011, 189:377-383.
17. Frasnelli J., Charbonneau G., Collignon O., Lepore F. Odor localization and sniffing. Chem. Senses 2009, 34:139-144.
18. Frasnelli J., Hummel T., Berg J., Huang G., Doty R.L. Intranasal localizability of odorants: influence of stimulus volume. Chem. Senses 2011, 36:405-410.
19. Frasnelli J., La Buissonnière Ariza V., Collignon O., Lepore F. Localisation of unilateral nasal stimuli across sensory systems. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 478:102-106.
20. Girard S., Collignon O., Lepore F. Multisensory gain within and across hemispaces in simple and choice reaction time paradigms. Exp. Brain Res. 2010.
21. Jacquot L., Monnin J., Brand G. Influence of nasal trigeminal stimuli on olfactory sensitivity. C. R. Biol. 2004, 327:305-311.
22. Johnson D.N., Yantis S. Allocating visual attention: tests of a two-process model. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1995, 21:1376-1390.
23. Kobal G., Hummel C. Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1988, 71:241-250.
24. Kobal G., Hummel T., Van Toller S. Differences in chemosensory evoked potentials to olfactory and somatosensory chemical stimuli presented to left and right nostrils. Chem. Senses 1992, 17:233-244.
25. Kobal G., Van Toller S., Hummel T. Is there directional smelling?. Experientia 1989, 45:130-132.
26. Koelewijn T., Bronkhorst A., Theeuwes J. Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: a review of audiovisual studies. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 2010, 134:372-384.
27. Livermore A., Hummel T. The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems. Chem. Senses 2004, 29:41-51.
28. Livermore A., Hummel T., Kobal G. Chemosensory event-related potentials in the investigation of interactions between the olfactory and the somatosensory (trigeminal) systems. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 83:201-210.
29. McDonald J.J., Teder-Salejarvi W.A., Hillyard S.A. Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature 2000, 407:906-908.
30. McDonald J.J., Teder-Salejarvi W.A., Ward L.M. Multisensory integration and crossmodal attention effects in the human brain. Science 2001, 292:1791.
31. Menning H., Ackermann H., Hertrich I., Mathiak K. Spatial auditory attention is modulated by tactile priming. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 164:41-47.
32. Michael G.A., Jacquot L., Millot J.L., Brand G. Ambient odors influence the amplitude and time course of visual distraction. Behav. Neurosci. 2005, 119:708-715.
33. Michael G.A., Jacquot L., Millot J.L., Brand G. Ambient odors modulate visual attentional capture. Neurosci. Lett. 2003, 352:221-225.
34. Millot J.L., Brand G., Morand N. Effects of ambient odors on reaction time in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 2002, 322:79-82.
35. Murphy C., Morgan C.D., Geisler M.W., Wetter S., Covington J.W., Madowitz M.D., Nordin S., Polich J.M. Olfactory event-related potentials and aging: normative data. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2000, 36:133-145.
36. Nordin S., Martinkauppi M., Olofsson J., Hummel T., Millqvist E., Bende M. Chemosensory perception and event-related potentials in self-reported chemical hypersensitivity. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2005, 55:243-255.
37. Pause B.M., Sojka B., Ferstl R. Central processing of odor concentration is a temporal phenomenon as revealed by chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERP). Chem. Senses 1997, 22:9-26.
38. Posner M.I., Petersen S.E. The attention system of the human brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1990, 13:25-42.
39. Prime D.J., McDonald J.J., Green J., Ward L.M. When cross-modal spatial attention fails. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 2008, 62:192-197.
40. Rimmele J., Jolsvai H., Sussman E. Auditory target detection is affected by implicit temporal and spatial expectations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:1136-1147.
41. Schurmann M., Caetano G., Hlushchuk Y., Jousmaki V., Hari R. Touch activates human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 2006, 30:1325-1331.
42. Senkowski D., Molholm S., Gomez-Ramirez M., Foxe J.J. Oscillatory beta activity predicts response speed during a multisensory audiovisual reaction time task: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:1556-1565.
43. Seubert J., Kellermann T., Loughead J., Boers F., Brensinger C., Schneider F., Habel U. Processing of disgusted faces is facilitated by odor primes: a functional MRI study. Neuroimage 2010, 53:746-756.
44. Seubert J., Loughead J., Kellermann T., Boers F., Brensinger C.M., Habel U. Multisensory integration of emotionally valenced olfactory-visual information in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2010, 35:185-194.
45. Small D.M., Jones-Gotman M., Zatorre R.J., Petrides M., Evans A.C. Flavor processing: more than the sum of its parts. Neuroreport 1997, 8:3913-3917.
46. Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford. C. Spence, J. Driver (Eds.).
47. Stormer V.S., McDonald J.J., Hillyard S.A. Cross-modal cueing of attention alters appearance and early cortical processing of visual stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:22456-22461.
48. Teder-Salejarvi W.A., Di Russo F., McDonald J.J., Hillyard S.A. Effects of spatial congruity on audio-visual multimodal integration. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:1396-1409.
49. Thurlow W.R., Jack C.E. Certain determinants of the ventriloquism effect. Percept. Mot. Skills 1973, 36:1171-1184.
50. Van der Burg E., Olivers C.N., Bronkhorst A.W., Theeuwes J. Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2008, 34:1053-1065.
51. Wada Y. Multisensory integration of vision and touch in nonspatial feature discrimination tasks. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 2010, 52:12-22.
52. Welge-Lussen A., Drago J., Wolfensberger M., Hummel T. Gustatory stimulation influences the processing of intranasal stimuli. Brain Res. 2005, 1038:69-75.
53. Wysocki C.J., Green B.G., Malia T.P. Monorhinal stimulation as a method for differentiating between thresholds for irritation and odor. Chem. Senses 1992, 17:722.