Exploring nursing e-learning systems success based on information system success model

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 741-747

  Chang, Hui Chuan ^a   Liu, Chung Feng ^b   Hwang, Hsin Ginn ^c  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHIA NAN UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

E learning systems; Information System Success Model; Intention; Nursing; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; THEORETICAL MODEL; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EDUCATION, NURSING; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTENTION; INTERNET; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84655167917     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e31821a1651     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Carnwell R. Pedagogical implications of approaches to study in distance learning: Developing models through qualitative and quantitative analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31(5):1018-1028.
2. Fletcher GH. The future of e-learning. THE J. 2004;32(2):4-5.
3. Maki R, Maki W, Patterson M, Whittaker P. Evaluation of a Webbased introductory psychology course: I. Learning and satisfaction in on-line versus lecture courses. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000;32(2):230-239.
4. Nelson EA. E-learning. A practical solution for training and tracking in patient-care settings. Nurs Adm Q. 2003;27(1):29-32.
5. Lee BC, Yoon JO, Lee I. Learners' acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Comput Educ. 2009;53(4):1320-1329.
6. Ozkan S, Koseler R. Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Comput Educ. 2009;53(4):1285-1296.
7. Young K. Using e-learning to liberate the talents of nurses. Ind Commer Train. 2003;35(4/5):137-141. (Pubitemid 36910721)
8. Maureen S.One strategy to reduce medication errors: The effect of an online continuing education module on nurses' use of the Lexi- Comp feature of the PyxisMedStation 2000. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008;26(1):23-30.
9. Department of Health (DoH) of Taiwan. The investigation of the current status of computerized medical record in hospitals of Taiwan. 2005. http://emr.doh.gov.tw/exProjects.aspx. Accessed April 13, 2011.
10. Kreideweis J. Indicators of success in distance education. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005;23(2):68-72. (Pubitemid 40522577)
11. DeLone W, McLean E. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J Manage Inform Syst. 2003;19(4):9-30.
12. DeLone W, McLean E. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform Syst Res. 1992;3(1):60-95.
13. Clark R, Mayer R. E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. 2nd ed. San Francisco, California: John Wiley and Sons; 2008.
14. Hall B. Web-Based Training Cookbook. New York: Wiley; 1997.
15. Rosenberg M. E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
16. Hair JF,AndersonRE, TathamRL, et al.Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1998.
17. Fornell C, Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981: 39-50.
18. Bentler P.EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software; 1989.
19. Bentler P. On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the bulletin. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:400-404.
20. Hu L, Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model. 1999;6(1):1-55.
21. Atack L. Becoming a Web-based learner: Registered nurses' experiences. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44(3):289-297. (Pubitemid 37414378)
22. Kenny A. Online learning: Enhancing nurse education? J Adv Nurs. 2002;38(2):127-135.
23. Cragg CE, Humbert J, Doucette S. A Toolbox of technical supports for nurses new toWeb learning. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004;22(1): 19-23. (Pubitemid 41632364)
24. ChangWY, Hsiao Sheen ST,Chang PC, et al. Developing an e-learning education programme for staff nurses: Processes and outcomes. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(7):822-828.
25. Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319-340.
26. Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, et al. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425-478.
27. Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 2001;25(3):351-370. (Pubitemid 33738440)
28. Goodhue D.Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Manage Sci. 1995:1827-1844.
29. Rogers EM.Diffusion of Innovation. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
30. Nahm ES, Barbara R, Barbara C. Development of theory-based, online health learning modules for older adults lessons learned. Comput Inform Nurs. 2006;24(5):261-268.