Co-digestion of dairy cattle slurry and industrial meat-processing by-products - Effect of ultrasound and hygienization pre-treatments

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 104, Issue , 2012, Pages 195-201

  Luste, Sami ^a   Heinonen Tanski, Helvi ^a   Luostarinen, Sari ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Animal by products; Biogas; Hygienization; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; ANIMAL BY-PRODUCTS; BATCH EXPERIMENTS; CODIGESTION; DAIRY CATTLES; ENERGY INPUTS; FEED MIXTURE; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; HYGIENIZATION; METHANE PRODUCTION; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; PRE-TREATMENT; PRE-TREATMENTS; SPECIFIC METHANE PRODUCTION; TOTAL SOLIDS; VOLATILE SOLID;

ANIMALS; BIOGAS; BYPRODUCTS; EXPERIMENTS; METHANE; SLURRY PIPELINES; ULTRASONICS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

METHANE;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; CATTLE; DAIRY FARMING; MEAT; METHANE; SLURRY; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; VOLATILE SUBSTANCE; WASTE TREATMENT;

AGRICULTURAL SLURRY; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BATCH PROCESS; CLOSTRIDIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAIRY CATTLE; ENTEROCOCCUS; MEAT INDUSTRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLUDGE DIGESTION; ULTRASOUND;

ABATTOIRS; ANIMALS; BIOREACTORS; CATTLE; DAIRY PRODUCTS; FOOD HANDLING; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MEAT; REFUSE DISPOSAL; SEWAGE; SONICATION; STERILIZATION;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 84655164871     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amon B., Kryvoruchko V., Amon T., Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 112:153-162.
2. Bougrier C., Carrère H., Delgenès J.P. Solubilisation of waste-activated sludge by ultrasonic treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 106:163-169.
3. Budiyono I., Widiasa S., Johari S. The influence of total solid contents on biogas yield from cattle manure using rumen fluid inoculum. Energy Res. 2010, 1:6-11.
4. Callaghan F., Wase K., Thayanithy C., Forster F. Co-digestion of waste organic solids: batch studies. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 67:117-122.
5. Chu C., Leea D., Changb B., Youb C., Tayc J. ''Weak'' ultrasonic pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion of flocculated activated biosolids. Water Res. 2002, 36:2681-2688.
6. Davidsson Å., la Cour Jansen J., Appelqvist B., Gruvberger C., Hallmer M. Anaerobic digestion potential of urban organic waste: a case study in Malmö. Waste Manage. Res. 2007, 25:162-169.
7. Dewil R., Baeyens J., Goutvrind R. The use of ultrasonics in the treatment of waste activated sludge. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 14:105-113.
8. CEN 26461-2, 1993. Water quality - Detection and enumeration of the spores of sulfite-reducing anaerobes (clostridia) - Part 2. Method by membrane filtration (ISO 6461-2, 1986). The European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
9. ISO 6579, 1993. Microbiology - General Guidance on Methods for the Detection of Salmonella. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
10. ISO 7899-2, 2000. Water quality. Detection and enumeration of intestinal enterococci. Part 2: Membrane filtration method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
11. Karim K., Hoffmann R., Klasson T., Al-Dahhan M. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: waste strength versus impact of mixing. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:1771-1781.
12. Khanal, S., Isik, H., Sung, S., van Leeuwen, J., 2006. Ultrasound conditioning of waste activated sludge for enhanced aerobic digestion. In: Conference Proceedings: Sustainable Sludge Management: State of the Art, Challenges and Perspectives, IWA, Moscow, pp. 441-448.
13. Lehtomäki A., Huttunen S., Rintala J. Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 51:591-609.
14. Lema J., Mendez R., Iza J., Garcia P., Fernandez-Polanco F. Chemical reactor engineering concepts in design and operation of anaerobic treatment processes. Water Sci. Technol. 1991, 24:79-86.
15. Luste S., Luostarinen S. Anaerobic co-digestion of meat-processing by-products and sewage sludge - effect of hygienization and organic loading rate. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:2657-2664.
16. Luste S., Luostarinen S., Sillanpää M. Effect of pre-treatments on hydrolysis and methane production potentials of by-products from meat-processing industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164:247-255.
17. Luste S., Vilhunen S., Luostarinen S. Effect of ultrasound and addition of bacterial product on hydrolysis of by-products from the meat-processing industry. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2011, 65:318-325.
18. a in calculations of the ammonia concentration in animal cell cultures. Biotechnol. Tech. 1997, 11:549-551.
19. Mata-Alvarez J. Biomethanization of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Wastes 2003, IWA, London.
20. Miron Y., Zeeman G., van Lier J., Lettinga G. The role of sludge retention time in the hydrolysis and acidification of lipids, carbohydrates and proteins during digestion of primary sludge in CSTR systems. Water Res. 2000, 34:1705-1713.
21. Myint M., Nirmalakhandan N., Speece R. Anaerobic fermentation of cattle manure: modeling of hydrolysis and acidogenesis. Water Res. 2007, 41:323-332.
22. Murto M., Björnsson L., Mattiasson B. Impact of food industrial waste on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure. J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 70:101-107.
23. Møller H., Sommer S., Ahring B. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26:485-495.
24. Palenzuela-Rollon, A., 1999. Anaerobic digestion of fish wastewater with special emphasis on hydrolysis of suspended solids. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen.
25. Renault F., Sancey B., Badot P., Crini G. Chitosan for coagulation/flocculation processes - an eco-friendly approach. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45:1337-1348.
26. Rosenwinkel K., Meyer H. Anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse residues in municipal digesters. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 40:101-111.
27. Sahlström L. A review of survival of pathogenic bacteria in organic waste used in biogas plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 87:161-166.
28. The European Parliament and the council of the European Union, 2006. Regulation (EC) No. 208/2006/EC. Commission regulation amending Annexes VI and VII to Regulation No. 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards processing standards for biogas and composting plants and requirements for manure. OJEU L36/2.
29. The European Parliament and the council of the European Union, 2009. Regulation (EC) No. 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and the council of the European Union laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 1774/2002 (Animal by-product regulation). OJEU L300/1.
30. Vedrenne F., Béline F., Dabert P., Bernet N. The effect of incubation conditions on the laboratory measurement of the methane producing capacity of livestock wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:146-155.
31. Wang Q., Kuninobu M., Kakimoto K., Ogawa H., Kato Y. Upgrading of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by ultrasonic pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 68:309-313.
32. Wang G., Zhao T., Doyle M. Fate of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in bovine faeces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62:2567-2570.
33. Ward A., Stensel D., Ferguson J., Ma G., Hummel S. Preventing growth of pathogens in pasteurised digester solids. Water Environ. Res. 1999, 71:176-182.
34. Xu W., Nikolov A., Wasan D.T. Shear-induced fat particle structure variation and the stability of food emulsions: II. Effects of surfactants, protein, and fat substitutes. J. Food Eng. 2005, 66:107-116.
35. Zahedifar M., Castro F., Ørskov E. Effect of hydrolytic lignin on formation of protein-lignin complexes and protein degradation by rumen microbes. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2002, 95:83-92.