Prenatal counseling - Implications of the cultural background of pregnant women on information processing, emotional response and acceptance

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 32, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2011, Pages

  Tschudin, S ^a   Huang, D ^a   Mor Gultekin H ^a   Alder, J ^a   Bitzer, J ^a   Tercanli, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

cultural factors; informed consent; migration; prenatal counseling; prenatal tests

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COUNSELING; CULTURAL FACTOR; DEPRESSION; EMOTION; ETHNOLOGY; EUROPE; FEMALE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LANGUAGE; MIGRATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; SOCIOECONOMICS; SWITZERLAND; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANXIETY; COUNSELING; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DEPRESSION; EMIGRANTS AND IMMIGRANTS; EMOTIONS; EUROPE; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MULTILINGUALISM; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SWITZERLAND; TURKEY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 84655161867     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: 14388782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281665     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Becker R, Wegner R D. Detailed screening for fetal anomalies and cardiac defects at the 11 13-week scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006 27 613-618 (Pubitemid 43967361)
2. Nicolaides K H., Spencer K, Avgidou K et al. Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated two-stage first-trimester screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005 25 221-226 (Pubitemid 40432687)
3. Kagan K O., Wright D, Baker A et al. Screening for trisomy 21 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008 31 618-624
4. Gasiorek-Wiens A, Tercanli S, Kozlowski P et al. Screening for trisomy 21 by fetal nuchal translucency and maternal age: a multicenter project in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001 18 645-648 (Pubitemid 34063068)
5. Tercanli S, Holzgreve W, Batukan C et al. [Screening for aneuploidy by first trimester nuchal translucency measurement: results from a prospective trial including 1980 cases in a single center in Switzerland]. Ultraschall Med 2002 23 22-26 (Pubitemid 34177269)
6. Bundesgesetz über genetische Untersuchungen beim Menschen. GUMG 2004 81 012
7. Chervenak F A., McCullough L B., Chasen S T. Clinical implications of the ethics of informed consent for first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21. Semin Perinatol 2005 29 277-279 (Pubitemid 41133571)
8. Getz L, Kirkengen A L. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: advancing technology, soft markers for fetal chromosomal aberrations, and unacknowledged ethical dilemmas. Soc Sci Med 2003 56 2045-2057 (Pubitemid 36410332)
9. Williams C, Alderson P, Farsides B. Dilemmas encountered by health practitioners offering nuchal translucency screening: a qualitative case study. Prenat Diagn 2002 22 216-220 (Pubitemid 34245836)
10. Favre R, Moutel G, Duchange N et al. What about informed consent in first-trimester ultrasound screening for Down syndrome? Fetal Diagn Ther 2008 23 173-184 (Pubitemid 351555838)
11. Gotzmann L, Schonholzer S M., Kolble N et al. [Ultrasound examinations in the context of suspected fetal malformations: satisfaction of concerned women and their appraisals]. Ultraschall Med 2002 23 27-32 (Pubitemid 34177270)
12. Weinans M J., Huijssoon A M., Tymstra T et al. How women deal with the results of serum screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2000 20 705-708
13. Schonholzer S M., Gotzmann L, Zimmermann R et al. [Psychological aspects of ultrasound examinations during pregnancy]. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 2000 40 119-124 (Pubitemid 32429631)
14. Gotzmann L, Schonholzer S M., Kolble N et al. [Suspected fetal malformation in ultrasound examination: effects on the psychological well-being of pregnant women]. Ultraschall Med 2002 23 33-40 (Pubitemid 34177271)
15. Lee M J., Roman A S., Lusskin S et al. Maternal anxiety and ultrasound markers for aneuploidy in a multiethnic population. Prenat Diagn 2007 27 40-45 (Pubitemid 46144339)
16. Borde T. Migrantinnen in gynäkologischer Behandlung: Ihre spezifischen Aufklärungs- und Versorgungsbedürfnisse. eutsche Krebsgesellschaft eV DKG, Forum DKG 2003 2 46-49
17. Harmsen J AM, Bernsen R MD, Bruijnzeels M A. et al. Patients evaluation of quality of care in general practice: what are the cultural and linguistic barriers? Patient Educ Couns 2008 72 155-162
18. Tschudin S, Holzgreve W, Conde N et al. [Pregnant womens assessment and level of knowledge of prenatal counseling]. Ultraschall Med 2009 30 157-162
19. Hoopman R, Terwee C B., Muller M J. et al. Methodological challenges in quality of life research among Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority cancer patients: translation, recruitment and ethical issues. Ethn Health 2009 14 237-253
20. Zigmond A S., Snaith R P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983 67 361-370 (Pubitemid 13098606)
21. Gekas J, Gondry J, Mazur S et al. Informed consent to serum screening for Down syndrome: are women given adequate information? Prenat Diagn 1999 19 1-7 (Pubitemid 29054593)
22. Goel V, Glazier R, Summers A et al. Psychological outcomes following maternal serum screening: a cohort study. Cmaj 1998 159 651-656 (Pubitemid 28474622)
23. Zlotogorski Z, Tadmor O, Duniec E et al. Anxiety levels of pregnant women during ultrasound examination: coping styles, amount of feedback and learned resourcefulness. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995 6 425-429
24. Leithner K, Maar A, Fischer-Kern M et al. Affective state of women following a prenatal diagnosis: predictors of a negative psychological outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004 23 240-246 (Pubitemid 38365800)
25. Bennett H A., Einarson A, Taddio A et al. Depression during Pregnancy: Overview of Clinical Factors. Clin Drug Investig 2004 24 157-179 (Pubitemid 38445264)
26. Heron J, OConnor T G., Evans J et al. The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. J Affect Disord 2004 80 65-73 (Pubitemid 38496530)
27. nd trimester. The pregnant womans background knowledge, expectations, experiences and acceptances. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000 15 383-386 (Pubitemid 33111793)
28. Moyer A, Brown B, Gates E et al. Decisions about prenatal testing for chromosomal disorders: perceptions of a diverse group of pregnant women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 1999 8 521-531
29. Reading A E., Cox D N., Campell S. A controlled prospective evaluation of the acceptability of ultrasound in prenatal care. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1988 8 191-198
30. Tymstra T J., Bajema C, Beekhuis J R. et al. Womens opinions on the offer and use of prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1991 11 893-898
31. Borde T, David M, Kentenich H. [What Turkish-speaking women expect in a German hospital and how satisfied they are with health care during their stay in a gynaecological hospital in Berlin a comparative approach]. Gesundheitswesen 2002 64 476-485 (Pubitemid 35025485)
32. Michie S, Smith D, Marteau T M. Prenatal tests: how are women deciding? Prenat Diagn 1999 19 743-748 (Pubitemid 29385404)
33. Heuvel A van den, Marteau T M. Cultural variation in values attached to informed choice in the context of prenatal diagnosis. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2008 13 99-102