Pregnant women's assessment and level of knowledge of prenatal counseling;Wie beurteilen schwangere die pränatale beratung und was wissen sie im anschluss daran?

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 157-162

  Tschudin, Sibil ^a   Holzgreve, W ^a   Conde, N ^a   Alder, J ^a   Bitzer, J ^a   Tercanli, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Decision analysis; Informed consent; Nuchal translucency; Prenatal counseling; Prenatal tests

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; PARENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPREHENSION; COUNSELING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; INFORMED CONSENT; LANGUAGE; LEGAL ASPECT; MIGRATION; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADULT; COMPREHENSION; COUNSELING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMIGRANTS AND IMMIGRANTS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MULTILINGUALISM; NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY MEASUREMENT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, FIRST; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 67649234445     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: 14388782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027383     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Rezertifizierung des Fähigkeitsausweises Schwangerschaftsultraschall-Auflage Kurs in kommunikativer Kompetenz Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 118-119
2. Alkazaleh F, Thomas M, Grebenyuk J et al. What womenwant: women's preferences of caregiver behaviour when prenatal sonography findings are abnormal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 56-62
3. Getz L, Kirkengen AL. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: advancing technology, soft markers for fetal chromosomal aberrations, and unacknowledged ehtical dilemmas. Social Science and Medicine 2003; 56: 2045-2057
4. Williams C, Alderson P, Farsides B. Dilemmas encountered by health practitioners offering nuchal translucency screening: a qualitative case study. Prenatal Diagn 2002; 22: 216-220
5. Schönholzer SM, Götzmann L, Zimmermann R et al. Psychologische Aspekte der Ultraschalluntersuchung während der Schwangerschaft. Gynäkol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 2000; 40: 119-124
6. Götzmann L, Schonholzer SM, Kolble N et al. Ultrasound examinations in the context of suspected fetal malformations: satisfaction of concerned women and their appraisals. Ultraschall in Med 2002; 23: 27-32
7. Götzmann L, Schönholzer SM, Kolble N et al. Suspected fetal malformation in ultrasound examination: effects on the psychological wellbeing of pregnant women. Ultraschall in Med 2002; 23: 33-40
8. Götzmann L, Kolble N, Schonholzer SM et al. Suspected fetal malformation in ultrasound examination: The partner's distress and attitudes towards ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2002; 23: 333-337
9. Leithner K, Maar A, Fischer-Kern M et al. Affective state of women following a prenatal diagnosis: predictors of a negative psychological outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 240-246
10. Bekker HL, Hewison J, Thornton JG. Applying decision analysis to facilitate informed decision making about prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 265-275
11. Drake ER, Engler-Todd L, O'Connor AM et al. Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Prenatal Testing for Women of Advanced Maternal Age. Journal of Genetic Counseling 1999; 8: 217-233
12. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expectations 2001; 4: 99-108
13. Marteau TM, Dormandy E. Facilitating Informed Choice in Prenatal Testing: How Well Are We Doing? American Journal of Medical Genetics 2001; 106: 185-190
14. Frey Tirri B, Troeger C, Holzgreve W et al. Quality management of nuchal translucency measurement in residents. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 484-488
15. Merz E, Meinel K, Bald R et al. DEGUM Level III recommendation for "follow-up" ultrasound examination (= DEGUM Level II) in the 11-14 week period of pregnancy. Ultraschall in Med 2004 Aug; 25 (4): 295-301
16. Eurenius K, Axelsson O, Gallstedt-Fransson I et al. Perception of information, expectations and experiences among women and their partners attending a second-trimester routine ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 86-90
17. Michie S, Smith D, Marteau TM. Prenatal tests: how are women deciding? Prenat Diagn 1999; 19: 743-748
18. Reading AE, Cox DN, Campbell S. A controlled, prospective evaluation of the acceptability of ultrasound in prenatal care. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 8: 191-198
19. Tymstra TJ, Bajema C, Beekhuis JR et al. Women's opinions on the offer and use of prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1991; 11: 893-898
20. Hürlimann D. Der Beratungsprozess in der Pränatalen Diagnostik. Zürich: Zentralstelle der Universität Zürich, 2006
21. Tercyak KP, Johnson SB, Roberts SF et al. Psychological response to prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 43: 73-84