Effects of age on long-term outcomes after a routine invasive or selective invasive strategy in patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A collaborative analysis of individual data from the FRISC II - ICTUS - RITA-3 (FIR) trials

Heart

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 207-213

  Damman, Peter ^a   Clayton, Tim ^b   Wallentin, Lars ^c   Lagerqvist, Bo ^c   Fox, Keith A A ^d   Hirsch, Alexander ^a   Windhausen, Fons ^a   Swahn, Eva ^e   Pocock, Stuart J ^b   Tijssen, Jan G P ^a   De Winter, Robbert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^e LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGE SPECIFIC CARE; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DATA ANALYSIS; ELDERLY CARE; FEMALE; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HEART DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; META ANALYSIS; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGE FACTORS; CAUSE OF DEATH; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MORBIDITY; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; NETHERLANDS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVIVAL RATE; THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84655161436     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300453     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Guidelines on myocardial revascularisation: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularisation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2010;31:2501-55.
2. Wallentin L, Lagerqvist B, Husted S, et al. Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial. FRISC II Investigators. Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease. Lancet 2000;356:9-16. (Pubitemid 30416988)
3. de Winter RJ, Windhausen F, Cornel JH, et al. Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes (ICTUS) Investigators. Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1095-104. (Pubitemid 41317432)
4. Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al.; Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina Investigators. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:743-51. (Pubitemid 35247703)
5. Bach RG, Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, et al. The effect of routine, early invasive management on outcome for elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:186-95.
6. Anderson HV, Cannon CP, Stone PH, et al. One-year results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) IIIB clinical trial. A randomized comparison of tissue-type plasminogen activator versus placebo and early invasive versus early conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:1643-50.
7. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Crawford MH, et al. Outcomes in patients with acute non- Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1785-92. (Pubitemid 28277958)
8. Bagnall AJ, Goodman SG, Fox KA, et al.; Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry I and II Investigators; Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE2) Investigators. Influence of age on use of cardiac catheterisation and associated outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:1530-6.
9. Alexander KP, Newby LK, Cannon CP, et al. American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation 2007;115:2549-69. (Pubitemid 46766536)
10. Damman P, Hirsch A, Windhausen F, et al. 5-year clinical outcomes in the ICTUS (Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable coronary Syndromes) trial: a randomized comparison of an early invasive versus selective invasive management in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:858-64.
11. Fox KA, Clayton TC, Damman P, et al. FIR Collaboration. Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2435-45.
12. Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, et al.; Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC-II) Investigators. 5-year outcomes in the FRISC-II randomised trial of an invasive versus a non-invasive strategy in non-STelevation acute coronary syndrome: a follow-up study. Lancet 2006;368:998-1004. (Pubitemid 44353692)
13. Fox KA, Poole-Wilson P, Clayton TC, et al. 5-year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Lancet 2005;366:914-20. (Pubitemid 41265665)
14. Lagerqvist B, Diderholm E, Lindahl B, et al. FRISC score for selection of patients for an early invasive treatment strategy in unstable coronary artery disease. Heart 2005;91:1047-52. (Pubitemid 41060013)
15. O'Donoghue M, Boden WE, Braunwald E, et al. Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-STsegment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300: 71-80. (Pubitemid 351920406)
16. Swahn E, Alfredsson J, Afzal R, et al. Early invasive compared with a selective invasive strategy in women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a substudy of the OASIS 5 trial and a meta-analysis of previous randomized trials. Eur Heart J. Published Online First: 7 Feb 2009. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehp009.
17. Lagerqvist B, Safstrom K, Stahle E, et al. Is early invasive treatment of unstable coronary artery disease equally effective for both women and men? FRISC II Study Group Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:41-8. (Pubitemid 32613826)
18. Clayton TC, Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, et al. Do men benefit more than women from an interventional strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction? The impact of gender in the RITA 3 trial. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1641-50. (Pubitemid 39209285)
19. Kandzari DE, Roe MT, Chen AY, et al. Influence of clinical trial enrollment on the quality of care and outcomes for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2005;149:474-81. (Pubitemid 40585411)
20. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:2173-95. (Pubitemid 350123680)