The processes of facilitation and inhibition in a cue-target paradigm: Insight from movement trajectory deviations

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 139, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 159-165

  Neyedli, Heather F ^a   Welsh, Timothy N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Cuing effects; Inhibition of return; Motor processes; Movement trajectories

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOVEMENT; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84655160797     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abrams R.A., Dobkin R.S. Inhibition of return. Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:467-477.
2. Chang E., Ro T. Inhibition of return in perception and action. Visual Cognition 2005, 12:443-472.
3. Cisek P. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2007, 362:1585-1599.
4. Coward R.S., Poliakoff V.E., O'Boyle D.J., Lowe C. The contribution of non-ocular response inhibition to visual inhibition of return. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 155:124-128.
5. Elliott D., Helsen W.F., Chua R. A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:342-357.
6. Georgopoulos A.P. Current issues in directional motor control. Trends in Neurosciences 1995, 18:506-510.
7. Godijn R., Theeuwes J. The relationship between inhibition of return and saccade trajectory deviations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:538-554.
8. Howard L.A., Lupiáñez J., Tipper S.P. Inhibition of return in a selective reaching task: An investigation of reference frames. The Journal of General Psychology 1999, 126:421-442.
9. Howard L.A., Tipper S.P. Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition. Experimental Brain Research 1997, 113:144-152.
10. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Science 2000, 4:138-147.
11. Maruff P., Yucel M., Danckert J., Stuart G., Currie J. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets. Neuropsychologica 1999, 37:731-744.
12. McPeek R.M., Han J.H., Keller E.L. Competition between saccade goals in the superior colliculus produces saccade curvature. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 89:2577-2590.
13. McSorley E., Haggard P., Walker R. Time course of oculomotor inhibition revealed by saccade trajectory modulation. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:1420-1424.
14. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance 1984, X:531-556. N. J: Erlbaum, Hillsdale. H. Bouma, D. Bouwhuis (Eds.).
15. Pratt J., Hillis J., Gold J.M. The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:489-495.
16. Prime D.J., Ward L.M. Inhibition of return from stimulus to response. Psychological Science 2004, 15:272-276.
17. Quaia C., Aizawa H., Optican L.M., Wurtz R.H. Reversible inactivation of monkey superior colliculus. II. Maps of saccadic deficits. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 79:2097-2110.
18. Reuter-Lorenz P.A., Jha A.P., Rosenquist J.N. What is inhibited in inhibition of return?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:367-378.
19. Ro T., Pratt J., Rafal R.D. Inhibition of return in saccadic eye movements. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 130:264-268.
20. Samuel A.G., Kat D. Inhibition of return: A graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:897-906.
21. Sheliga B.M., Riggio L., Rizzolatti G. Spatial attention and eye movements. Experimental Brain Research 1995, 105:261-275.
22. Song J.H., Nakayama K. Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:360-366.
23. Taylor T.L., Klein R.M. Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1639-1656.
24. Tipper S.P., Howard L.A., Houghton G. Behavioral consequences of selection from population codes. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 223-245. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
25. Welsh T.N. The relationship between attentional capture and deviations in movement trajectories in selective reaching tasks. Acta Psychologica 2011, 3:300-308.
26. Welsh T.N., Elliott D. Effects of response priming and inhibition on movement planning and execution. Journal of Motor Behavior 2004, 36:200-211.
27. Welsh T.N., Elliott D. Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A - Human Experimental Psychology 2004, 57:1031-1057.
28. Welsh T.N., Pratt J. Inhibition of return in cue-target and target-target tasks. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 174:167-175.
29. Welsh T.N., Weeks D.J. Visual selective attention & action. Vision and goal-directed movement: Neurobehavioral perspectives 2010, 39-58. Human Kinetics, Champaign Illinois. D. Elliott, M.A. Khan (Eds.).
30. Wilson D.E., Pratt J. Evidence from a response choice task reveals a selection bias in the attentional cueing paradigm. Acta Psychologica 2007, 126:216-225.
31. Woodworth R.S. The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review 1899, 3(3, Suppl. 13):1-119.