Nonwork travel behavior changes during temporary freeway closure: The fix i-5 project in Sacramento, California

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2231, 2011, Pages 1-9

  Yun, Meiping ^a   Van Herick, David ^b   Mokhtarian, Patricia L ^b  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY LOCATIONS; BEHAVIOUR CHANGES; CALIFORNIA; CHANGE MODELING; HIGHLY-CORRELATED; INTERNET SURVEY; NONWORK TRAVEL; TIME OF DAY; TRAFFIC CONDITIONS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR;

LOCATION;

EID: 84455211080     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2231-01     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Dixon, K. K., J. E. Hummer, and A. R. Lorscheider. Capacity for North Carolina Freeway Work Zones. In Transportation Research Record 1529, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 27-34. (Pubitemid 126527563)
2. Racha, S., M. Chowdhury, W. Sarasua, and Y. Ma. Analysis of Work Zone Traffic Behavior for Planning Applications. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2008, pp. 183-199. (Pubitemid 351404795)
3. Hendrickson, C. T., R. E. Carrier, T. J. Dubyak, and R. B. Anderson. Traveler Response to Reconstruction of Parkway East (I-376) in Pittsburgh. In Transportation Research Record 890, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 33-39. (Pubitemid 13540517)
4. Tsuchida, P., and L. Wilshusen. Effects of the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake on Commute Behavior in Santa Cruz County, California. In Transportation Research Record 1321, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 26-33.
5. Hu, P. S., and T. R. Reuscher. Summary of Travel Trends: 2001 National Household Travel Survey. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.
6. McGuckin, N., and N. Srinivasan. The Journey-to-Work in the Context of Daily Travel. Prepared for Census Data for Transportation Planning: Preparing for the Future. Irvine, Calif., May 2005. http://onlinepubs. trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/conferences/2005/censusdata/Resource-Journey-to-Work. pdf. Accessed May 9, 2011.
7. Horner, M. W., and M. E. O'Kelly. Is Non-Work Travel Excessive? Journal of Transportation Geography, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2007, pp. 411-416. (Pubitemid 47618393)
8. Office of the Governor of California. Governor Schwarzenegger Issues Executive Order to Help Ease Congestion During Fix I-5 Project. GAAS: 258:08, May 16, 2008. http://newsblaze.com/story/20080517102524tsop. nb/topstory.html. Accessed June 20, 2010.
9. Mokhtarian, P. L., L. Ye, and M. Yun. The Effect of Gender on Commute Impacts and Behavior Changes in the Context of a Major Freeway Reconstruction. Presented at 4th International Conference on Women's Issues in Transportation, Irvine, Calif., 2009. http://pubs.its.ucdavis. edu/publication-detail.php?id= 1408. Accessed May 9, 2011.
10. Ye, L., P. L. Mokhtarian, and G. Circella. Commuter Impacts and Behavior Changes During a Temporary Freeway Closure: The Fix I-5 Project in Sacramento, California. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
11. Horowitz, J. A. Utility Maximizing Model of the Demand for Multi-Destination Non-Work Travel. Transportation Research, Part B, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1980, pp. 369-386.
12. Boarnet, M. G., and S. Sarmiento. Can Land-Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behaviour? A Study of the Link between Non-Work Travel and Land-Use Characteristics. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 7, 1998, pp. 1155-1169.
13. Chatman, D. G. Deconstructing Development Density: Quality, Quantity, and Price Effects on Household Non-Work Travel. Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 42, No. 7, 2008, pp. 1008-1030.
14. Cao, X., P. L. Mokhtarian, and S. L. Handy. The Relationship between the Built Environment and Nonwork Travel: A Case Study of Northern California. Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2009, pp. 548-559.
15. Meurs, H., and R. Haaijer. Spatial Structure and Mobility. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 6, No. 6, 2001, pp. 429-446. (Pubitemid 32782293)
16. Scheiner, J. Social Inequalities in Travel Behaviour: Trip Distances in the Context of Residential Self-Selection and Lifestyles. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2010, pp. 679-690.
17. Meyer, M. D. Demand Management as an Element of Transportation Policy: Using Carrots and Sticks to Influence Travel Behavior. Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 33, No. 7-8, 1999, pp. 575-599. (Pubitemid 29511583)
18. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
19. Mauch, M., and B. D. Taylor. Gender, Race, and Travel Behavior: Analysis of Household-Serving Travel and Commuting in San Francisco Bay Area. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 147-153. (Pubitemid 127550711)
20. Hjorthol, R. J. Gender Aspects of Travel Behavior Development: A Norwegian Example. Presented at Conference on Research on Women's Issues in Transportation, Chicago, Ill., November, 2004.
21. Matthies, E., S. Kuhn, and C. A. Klöckner. Travel Mode Choice of Women: The Result of Limitation, Ecological Norm, or Weak Habit? Environment and Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2002, pp. 163-177. (Pubitemid 34152756)
22. Hauser, J. R. Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness, and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information-Theoretic Approach. Operations Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1978, pp. 406-421.