Demand management as an element of transportation policy: Using carrots and sticks to influence travel behavior

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 33, Issue 7-8, 1999, Pages 575-599

  Meyer, Michael D ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Demand management; System management; Transportation policy

Indexed keywords

HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION; LAND USE; PUBLIC POLICY; REGIONAL PLANNING;

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM); TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

CAR USE; DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033197888     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00008-7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. 1000 Friends of Oregon, 1997. Making the connections: A summary of the LUTRAQ project. Portland, OR.
2. Apogee Research Inc., 1997. Costs and Effectiveness of Transportation Control Measures: A Review and Analysis of the Literature. National Association of Regional Councils, Washington D.C.
3. Altshuler, A., 1979. The Urban Transportation System. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Anderson, D., Mohring, H., 1996. Congestion costs and congestion pricing for the Twin Cities, Final Report 96-32, Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota department of transportation.
5. Bureau of Public Roads, 1962. Utilizing full capacity of urban arterial streets. Circular memorandum from Deputy Federal Highway Administrator to Regional and Division Engineers.
6. Cambridge Systematics Inc., 1994. The effects of land use and travel demand management strategies on commuting behavior. Final Report DOT-95-06. US DOT, Washington D.C.
7. Cambridge Systematics, 1996. Quantifying air quality and other benefits and costs of transportation control measures. Task 1 Report. Project 8-33. National Cooperative Highway Research, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
8. Carter, A., Jr., 1962. Increasing the Traffic Carrying Capacity of Urban Arterial Streets. Bureau of Public Roads, Washington D.C.
9. Central Transportation Planning Staff, 1984. Transportation-Energy Conservation Plan for the Boston Region. Boston, MA.
10. Charles River Associates, 1980. Transportation System Management Handbook of Techniques and Impacts. US Department of Transportation, Washington D.C.
11. Duve, J., 1994. How congestion pricing came to be proposed in the San Diego region: a case history. In: Curbing gridlock: peak period fees to relieve congestion. Special Report 242. Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board.
12. Environmental Protection Agency US Department of Transportation, 1978. Transportation-Air Quality Planning Guidelines. Washington, D.C.
13. Federal Highway Administration, 1969. Urban traffic operations program to increase capacity and safety, Policy and Procedure Memorandum 21-18.
14. Ferguson, E., 1997. The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970-90. Transportation 24.
15. Gakenheimer, R., Meyer, M., 1979. Urban transportation planning in transition: the sources and prospects of TSM. J. American Planning Association: 28-35.
16. Gerwig, K., 1996. Transportation Demand Management as a Business Necessity. TDM Review, Washington D.C. Association for Commuter Transportation, Washington D.C.
17. Guiliano, G., Hwang, K., Wachs, M., 1992. Mandatory trip reduction in Southern California: first year results. University of Southern California/University of California, Department of Urban Planning, Los Angeles.
18. Huag International LDA Consulting, 1998. SB 836 evaluation of Rule 2202 voluntary replacement measures. Metropolitan Transportation District, Los Angeles.
19. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1980. Energy Impacts of Urban Transportation Improvements. Washington, D.C.
20. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1993. Implementing Effective Travel Demand Management Measures. US Department of Transportation, Washington D.C.
21. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1994. Evaluation of Employee Trip Reduction Programs Based on California's Experience with Regulation XV. Washington, D.C.
22. Kirby, H.R., 1981. Personal travel budgets. Transportation Research, Part A 15:1.
23. Maryland Department of Transportation, 1995. Strategies Identification Guidance Document. Baltimore, MD.
24. Meyer, M., 1978. Organizational response to a federal policy initiative in the public transportation sector: a study of implementation and compliance. unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
25. Meyer, M., Siwek, S., Berman, W. (Eds.) 1994. The state-of-the-practice of travel demand management. In: Transportation Research Board, TDM Innovation and Research Symposium. Transportation Research Circular 433. Washington D.C.
26. Meyer, M., 1997. A Toolbox for Alleviating Traffic Congestion and Enhancing Mobility. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington D.C.
27. Meyer, J., Kain, J., Wohl, M., 1965. The Urban Transportation Problem. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
28. Metropolitan Service District of Portland, 1992. Region 2040: Shaping the Choices for Growth. Portland, OR.
29. New York State DOT, 1981. Energy impacts of transportation system management actions. Report DOT-I-82-4.
30. Orski, C.K., 1993. Employee trip reduction programs-an evaluation. Transportation Quarterly 47.
31. Phillips, J., Goodstein, E., 1998. Has Portland's urban growth boundary raised housing prices? Paper presented at the Western Economic Association Meetings.
32. Public Technology Inc., 1980. Transportation Energy Contingency Planning. US Department of Transportation, Washington D.C.
33. Replogle, M., 1993a. Transportation Conformity and Demand Management: Vital Strategies for Clean Air Attainment. Environmental Defense Fund, Washington D.C.
34. Replogle, M., 1993b. Motor Vehicle Use and the Clean Air Act: Boosting Efficiency by Reducing Travel. Environmental Defense Fund, Washington D.C.
35. Schafer, A., Victor, D., 1997. The past and future of global mobility. Scientific American, Oct.
36. Shoup, D., 1996. Evaluating the Effects of Parking Cash Out: Eight Case Studies. Department of Urban Planning, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
37. Small, K., Winston, C., Evans, C., 1989 Road work: A New Highway Pricing and Investment Policy. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
38. Shamanske, S., 1996. The Bay Bridge blunder. Regulation. No. 4.
39. Teal, R.F., 1987. Carpooling: Who, how and why. Transportation Research 21A.
40. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1972. External Operating Manual. US Department of Transportation, Washington D.C.
41. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1975. Capital and Operating Assistance Formula Grants: Interim Guidelines and Procedures. Federal Register, Washington D.C.
42. Urbitran Assocs, 1982. Transportation systems management: Implementation and impacts. Report DOT-I-82-49, Washington D.C.: US Department of Transportation.
43. US Department of Transportation, 1971. Feasibility of federal assistance for urban mass transportation operating costs, Report to Congress. Washington D.C.
44. US Department of Transportation, 1993a. Management and monitoring systems: Interim final rule. 23 CFR Parts 500 and 626. Federal Register, Washington D.C.
45. US Department of Transportation, 1993b. Statewide planning; Metropolitan planning rule,' 23 CFR Part 450, 49 CFR Part 613, Federal Register, Washington D.C.
46. Voorhees, A.M., Assocs, A., 1974. Status of the urban corridor demonstration program. Report DOT-P-6500.2, US Department of Transportation, Washington D.C.
47. Wagner, F.A., Gilbert, K., 1978. Transportation System Management: An Assessment of Impacts. US Department of Transportation, Washington D.C.