Duodenal versus jejunal biopsies in suspected celiac disease

Endoscopy

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 993-996

  Thijs, W J ^a,b   van Baarlen, J ^c   Kleibeuker, J H ^b   Kolkman, J J ^a  

^a MEDISCH SPECTRUM TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c Dept of Pathology Oost Nederland ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CELIAC DISEASE; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DUODENUM BIOPSY; ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JEJUNUM BIOPSY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; BIOPSY; CELIAC DISEASE; DUODENUM; ENDOSCOPES; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JEJUNUM; MALE; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 8444247865     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-825954     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Walker-Smith JA, Guandalini S, Schmitz J et al. Revised criteria for diagnosis of celiac disease. Report of the Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 909-911
2. When is a coeliac a coeliac? Report of a working group a the United European Gastroenterology Week in Amsterdam, 2001. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2001; 13: 1123-1128
3. Mäki M, Collin P. Coeliac disease. Lancet 1997; 349: 1755-1759
4. Parnell NDJ, Ciclitira PJ. Review article: coeliac disease and its management. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999; 13: 1-13
5. Hankey GL, Holmes GKT. Coeliac disease in the elderly. Gut 1994; 35: 65-67
6. Marsh MN. Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (celiac sprue). Gastroenterology 1992; 102: 330-354
7. Wahab PJ, Crusius BA, Meijer JWR et al. Gluten challenge in borderline gluten-sensitive enteropathy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1464-1469
8. Kaukinen K, Mäki M, Partanen J et al. Celiac disease without villous atrophy. Revision of criteria called for. Dig Dis Sci 2001; 46: 879-887
9. Day DW, Jass JR, Sheperd NA et al. Malnutrition, maldigestion and malabsorption. In: Day DW, Jass JR, Price AB, et al. (eds). Morson and Dawson's gastrointestinal pathology. 4th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2003: 324-339
10. Wärngãrd O, Stenhammer L, Ascher H et al. Small bowel biopsy in Swedish paediatric clinics. Acta Paediatr 1996; 85: 240-241
11. Mee AS, Burke M, Vallon AG et al. Small bowel biopsy for malabsorption: comparison of the diagnostic adequacy of endoscopic forceps and capusle biopsy specimens. Br Med J 1985; 291: 769-772
12. Branski D, Faber J, Freier S et al. Histologic evaluation of endoscopic versus suction biopsies of small intestinal mucosae in children with and without celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998; 27: 6-11
13. Linaker BD, Calam J. Jejunal biopsy with the Watson capsule and perforation in the elderly. Gastroenterology 1978; 75: 723-725
14. Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standarized report scheme for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11: 1185-1194
15. Abdulkarim AS, Burgart LJ, See J et al. Etiology of nonresponsive celiac disease: results of a systemic approach. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 2016-2021
16. Holdstock G, Eade OE, Isaacson P et al. Endoscopic duodenal biopsies in coeliac disease and duodenitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1979; 14: 717-720
17. Granot E, Goodman-Weill M, Pizov G et al. Histological comparison of suction capsule and endoscopic small intestinal mucosal biopsies in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1993; 16: 397-401
18. Achkar E, Carey WD, Petras R et al. Comparison of suction capsule and endoscopic biopsy of small bowel mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32: 278-281
19. Scott BB, Jenkins D. Endoscopic small intestinal biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27: 62-167
20. Wahab PJ, Meijer JWR, Mulder CJJ. Small intestinal biopsies in coeliac disease: duodenal or jejunal? Virchows Arch 2003; 442: 124-128
21. Vogelsang H, Hanel S, Steiner B, Oberhuber G. Diagnostic duodenal bulb biopsy in celiac disease. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 336-340
22. Scott B, Holmes G. Perforation from endoscopic small bowel biopsy. Gut 1993; 34: 134-135
23. Barakat MH, Ali SM, Badawi AR et al. Peroral endoscopic duodenal biopsy in infants and children. Acta Paediatr 1983; 72: 563-569
24. Saverymuttu SH, Sabbat J, Burke M et al. Impact of endoscopic duodenal biopsy on the detection of small intestinal villous atrophy. Postgrad Med J 1991; 67: 47-49
25. Goldstein NS, Underhill J. Morphologic features suggestive of gluten sensitivity in architecturally normal duodenal biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 116: 63-71
26. Mäki M, Holm K, Koskimies S et al. Normal small bowel biopsy followed by coeliac disease. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 1137-1141
27. Collin P, Helin H, Mäki M et al. Follow-up of patients positive in reticulin and gliadin antibody test with normal small bowel biopsy findings. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993; 28: 595-598
28. Corazza GR, Andreani ML, Biagi F et al. Clinical, pathological, and antibody pattern of latent celiac disease: report of three cases. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 2203-2207
29. Thijs WJ, van Baarlen J, Mulder CJJ et al. Small bowel intraepithelial lymphocytosis and normal villous architecture (Marsh I): gluten sensitive enteropathy [abstract]? Gastroenterology 1999; 116: A897