Comparison of fetal heart rate baseline estimation by SisPorto® 2.01 and a consensus of clinicians

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 174-178

  Ayres De Campos, Diogo ^a   Bernardes, João ^a  

^a University of Porto   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Agreement; Baseline; Computer analysis; Fetal heart rate; SisPorto 2.01

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FETUS; FETUS HEART RATE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 8444225973     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.03.013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Dawes G.S., Houghton C.R.S., Redman C.W.G. Baseline in human fetal heart-rate records. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 89:1982;270-275
2. Mantel R., van Geijn H.P., Caron F.J.M., Swartjes J.M., van Woerden E.E., Jongsma H.W. Computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate. 1. Baseline determination. Int. J. Biomed. Comput. 25(4):1990;261-272
3. Taylor G.M., Mires G.J., Tsantis S., Farrell T., Chien P.F.W., Liu Y. The development and validation of an algorithm for real-time computerised fetal heart rate monitoring in labour. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 107:2000;1130-1137
4. Dawes G.S., Moulden M., Redman C.W.G. System 8000: computerized antenatal FHR analysis. J. Perinat. Med. 19(1-2):1991;47-51
5. Arduini D., Rizzo G., Piana G., Bonalumi A., Brambilla P., Romanini C. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate. I. Description of the system (2CTG). J. Matern. Fetal Invest. 3:1993;159-163
6. Maeda K. Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms and fetal movements. Baillieres Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 4(4):1990;797-813
7. Chung T.K., Mohajer M.P., Yang Z.J., Chang A.M., Sahota D.S. The prediction of fetal acidosis at birth by computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 102(6):1995;454-460
8. Hamilton E., Kimanani E.K. Intrapartum prediction of fetal status and assessment of labour progress. Baillieres Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 8(3):1994;567-581
9. ® 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms. J. Matern. Fetal Med. 9(5):2000;311-318
10. Gagnon R., Bocking A.D., Richardson B.S., McLean P. A flat decelerative fetal heart rate tracing with normal fetal heart rate variability. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 171(5):1994;1379-1381
11. Matias A., Xavier P., Bernardes J., Patricio B. Fetal heart-rate monitoring during maternal hypoglycaemic coma: a case report. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 79(2):1998;223-225
12. Ayres-de-Campos D., Bernardes J., Marsal K., Nickelsen C., Makarainen L., Banfield P., et al. Can the reproducibility of fetal heart rate baseline estimation be improved? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 112(1):2004;49-54
13. Shoukri MM, Edge VL. Statistical methods for health sciences. New York: CRC Press; 1996.
14. Grant J.M. The fetal heart rate is normal, isn't it? Observer agreement of categorical assessments. Lancet. 337(8735):1991;215-218
15. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1(8476):1986;307-310
16. Khan K.S., Chien P.F.W., Honest M.R., Norman G.R. Evaluating measurement variability in clinical investigations: the case of ultrasonic estimation of urinary bladder volume. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 104(9):1997;1036-10342
17. Trimbos J.B., Keirse M.J.N.C. Observer variability in assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 85(12):1978;900-906
18. Gagnon R., Campbell M.K., Hunse C. A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 168(3 Part 1):1993;842-847
19. Arduini D., Rizzo G., Giannini F., Garzetti G.G., Romanini C. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate. II. Comparison with the interpretation of experts. J. Matern. Fetal Invest. 3:1993;165-168
20. Bernardes J., Costa-Pereira A., van Geijn H.P., Pereira-Leite L. A more objective fetal heart rate baseline estimation. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 103:1996;714-715
21. Mongelli M., Dawkins R., Chung T., Sahota D., Spencer J.A., Chang A.M. Computerised estimation of the baseline fetal heart rate in labour: the low frequency line. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 104(10):1997;1128-1133
22. Devoe L., Golde S., Kilman Y., Morton D., Shea K., Waller J. A comparison of visual analysis of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 183(2):2000;361-366
23. Todros T., Preve C.U., Plazzotta C., Biolcati M., Lombardo P. Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 68:1996;83-86
24. Bernardes J., Costa-Pereira A., Ayres-de-Campos D., van Geijn H.P., Pereira-Leite L. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 57:1997;33-37
25. Ayres-de-Campos D., Bernardes J. Early, variable and late decelerations: can a consensus be reached in their identification? Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 65:1999;305-306
26. Bernardes J, Moura C, Marques-de-Sá JP, Pereira-Leite L, van Geijn HP. The Porto system. In: van Geijn HP, Copray FJA, editors. A critical appraisal of fetal surveillance. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1994. p. 315-24.
27. Bernardes J., Ayres-de-Campos D., Costa-Pereira A., Marques-de-Sá J.P., Pereira-Leite L. Baseline estimation in typical fetal heart rate patterns using different computerised methods. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 76(Suppl. 167:1):1997;56
28. Nijhuis J.G., Prechtl H.F., Martin C.B., Bots R.S. Are there behavioural states in the human fetus. Early Hum. Dev. 6(2):1982;177-195