Early, variable and late decelerations: Can a consensus be reached in their identification?

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 305-306

  Ayres de Campos, D ^a   Bernardes, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Agreement; Cardiotocography; Consensus; Fetal heart rate; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECELERATION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FETUS; FETUS HEART RATE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY;

EID: 0033050427     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00047-8     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Rooth G, Huch A, Huch R. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1987;25:159-167.
2. Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, van Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1997;57:33-37.
3. Grant JM. The fetal heart rate is normal, isn't it? Observer agreement of categorical assessments. Lancet 1991;337:215-218.