Labor course and delivery in epidural analgesia: A case-control study

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 115-118

  Decca, L ^a   Daldoss, C ^a   Fratelli, N ^a   Lojacono, A ^a   Slompo, M C ^a   Stegher, C ^a   Valcamonico, A ^a   Frusca, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Delivery; Epidural analgesia; Labor

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE; MEPIVACAINE; ROPIVACAINE; SUFENTANIL;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTERIAL PH; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; FETUS OUTCOME; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPARA; NULLIPARA; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; VACUUM EXTRACTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 8444225336     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/jmf.16.2.115.118     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2): CD000331
2. Morton SC, Williams MS, Keeler EB, et al. Effect of epidural analgesia for labor on the cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:1045-52
3. Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM, et al. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:851-8
4. Ramin SM, Gambling DR, Lucas MJ, et al. Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labour. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:783-9
5. Newton ER, Shroeder BC, Knape KG, et al. Epidural analgesia and uterine function. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:749-55
6. Alexander JM, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, et al. The course of labor with and without epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:516-20
7. Impey L, MacQuillan K, Robson M. Epidural analgesia need not increase operative delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:358-63
8. Analgesia and Cesarean delivery rates. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 269. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:369-70
9. Eberle RL, Arkoosh VA, Norris MC, et al. Epidural analgesia and uterine function [letter]. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:634
10. Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, et al. High-dose oxytocin: 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:234-8
11. Viscomi CM. Epidural analgesia and uterine function [letter]. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:634-5
12. Dewan DM, Cohen SE. Epidural analgesia and the incidence of cesarean section: time for a closer look [editorial]. Anesthesiology 1994;80:1189-92
13. Satin AJ. Dystocia and the Augmentation of Labor. Technical Bulletin No. 218. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1995
14. MacArthur C, Shennan AH, May A, et al. Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:19-23