Conjugation of gold nanoparticles to polypropylene mesh for enhanced biocompatibility

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2803-2812

  Grant, D N ^a   Benson, J ^a   Cozad, M J ^a   Whelove, O E ^a   Bachman, S L ^a   Ramshaw, B J ^b   Grant, D A ^a   Grant, S A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b McHaney Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR RESPONSE; CHLORIDE SOLUTIONS; FOREIGN BODY REACTIONS; GOLD NANOPARTICLES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL CULTURE; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; GOLD; HYDROGEN; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MECHANICAL TESTING; NANOPARTICLES; PLASTIC PRODUCTS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; THERMOPLASTICS;

POLYPROPYLENES;

CARBOXYL GROUP; COBALT CHLORIDE; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; GOLD NANOPARTICLE; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; POLYPROPYLENE; ALKENE; AMINE; BIOMATERIAL; COBALT; CROSS LINKING REAGENT; GOLD; METAL NANOPARTICLE; PROPYLENE;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL CULTURE; CONJUGATION; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; THERMAL ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; HERNIA; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOUSE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURGICAL MESH;

ALKENES; AMINES; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CALORIMETRY, DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING; CELL LINE; COBALT; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; GOLD; HERNIA; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; MATERIALS TESTING; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POLYPROPYLENES; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURGICAL MESH;

EID: 84355162977     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4449-6     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. CN Brown JG Finch 2010 Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 92 4 272 278 10.1308/003588410X12664192076296 1:STN:280: DC%2BC3czmtlCqtA%3D%3D
2. S Bringman J Conze D Cuccurullo J Deprest K Junge B Klosterhalfen E Parra-Davila B Ramshaw V Schumpelick 2010 Hernia repair: the search for ideal meshes Hernia. 14 1 81 87 10.1007/s10029-009-0587-x 1:STN:280: DC%2BC3c%2FnsFeqtQ%3D%3D
3. Yang J, Papandria D, Rhee D, Perry H, Abdullah F. Low-cost mesh for inguinal hernia repair in resource-limited settings. Hernia. 2011; In press.
4. G Voskerician J Jin M White C Williams M Rosen 2010 Effect of biomaterial design criteria on the performance of surgical meshes for abdominal hernia repair: a pre-clinical evaluation in a chronic rat model J Mater Sci Mater Med. 21 6 1989 1995 10.1007/s10856-010-4037-1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXntVeisLw%3D
5. EC Nelson TJ Vidovszky 2011 Composite mesh migration into the sigmoid colon following ventral hernia repair Hernia. 15 1 47 52 10.1007/s10029-009- 0623-x
6. MJ Cozad BR Ramshaw DN Grant SL Bachman DA Grant SA Grant 2010 Materials characterization of explanted polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene composites: spectral and thermal analysis J Biomed Mater Res B. 49B 455 462
7. K Sutherland JR Mahoney AJ Coury JW Eaton 1993 Degradation of biomaterials by phagocyte-derived oxidants J Clin Invest. 92 2360 2367 10.1172/JCI116841 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXhtFKktrw%3D (Pubitemid 23333543)
8. CR Costello SL Bachman BR Ramshaw SA Grant 2007 Materials characterization of explanted heavyweight polypropylene hernia meshes J Biomed Mater Res B. 83B 44 49 10.1002/jbm.b.30764 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFaitbfN (Pubitemid 47463194)
9. NB Zinther P Wara H Friis-Andersen 2010 Shrinkage of intraperitoneal onlay mesh in sheep: coated polyester mesh versus covered polypropylene mesh Hernia 14 6 611 615 10.1007/s10029-010-0682-z 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cbntlKjuw%3D%3D
10. G Beldi M Wagner LE Bruegger A Kurmann D Candinas 2010 Mesh shrinkage and pain in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing suture versus tack mesh fixation Surg Endosc 24 6 1451 1455 10.1007/s00464-009-0799-2
11. Khan RN, Kindal V, Bansal VK, Misra MC, Kumar S. Does mesh shrinkage in any way depend upon the method of mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair? Surgical Endoscopy. 2010. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1363-9.
12. DM Downey JJ Dubose TA Ritter JP Dolan 2011 Validation of a radiographic model for the assessment of mesh migration J Surg Res. 166 109 113 10.1016/j.jss.2009.05.003
13. AR Bhattacharyya TV Sreekumar T Liu S Kumar LM Ericson RH Hauge RE Smalley 2003 Crystallization and orientation studies in polypropylene/single wall carbon nanotube composite Polymers. 44 8 2373 2377 10.1016/S0032-3861(03) 00073-9 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXitFGrs7c%3D (Pubitemid 36362352)
14. Bohm, G, Ushakova Y, Alizai H, Braunschweig T, Lente C, Heffels K, Groll J, Neumann U, Junge D. Biocompatibility of PLGA/sP(EO-stat-PO)-coated mesh surfaces under constant shearing stress. Eur Surg Res. 2011;47(3):118-129.
15. S Hsu C Tang H Tseng 2006 Biocompatibility of poly(ether)urethane-gold nanocomposites J Biomed Mater Res A. 79 759 770 (Pubitemid 44915897)
16. C Chou S Hsu P Wang 2007 Biostability and biocompatibility of poly(ether)urethane containing gold or silver nanoparticles in a porcine model J Biomed Mater Res A. 84 785 794 (Pubitemid 351237796)
17. O Kalayci F Comert B Hazer T Atalay K Cavicchi M Cakmak 2010 Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activity of metal nanoparticles embedded into amphiphilic comb-type graft copolymers Polym Bull. 65 215 226 10.1007/s00289-009-0196-y 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtlWktrbF
18. EM Christenson KS Anseth LJ van den Beucken CK Chan B Ercan JA Jansen CT Laurencin WJ Li R Murugan LS Nair 2007 Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics J Orthop Res. 25 11 22 10.1002/jor.20305 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXivVOks7g%3D (Pubitemid 46070727)
19. G Balasundaram TJ Webster 2006 A perspective on nanophase materials for orthopedic implant applications J Mater Chem. 16 3737 3745 10.1039/b604966b 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XpvF2nur0%3D (Pubitemid 44454232)
20. Dillow AK, Lowman AM. Biomimetic materials and design. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 2002.
21. S Kay A Thapa KM Haberstroh TJ Webster 2002 Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion Tissue Eng. 8 753 761 10.1089/10763270260424114 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xpt12gt7o%3D (Pubitemid 35239753)
22. NJ Sniakecki RA Desai SA Ruiz CS Chen 2006 Nanotechnology for cell-substrate interactions Ann Biomed Eng. 34 1 59 74 10.1007/s10439-005-9006-3
23. AI Teixeira PF Nealey CJ Murphy 2004 Responses of human keratocytes to micro-nanostructured substrates J Biomed Mater Res. 71A 3153 3164 10.1002/jbm.a.30089 (Pubitemid 39488509)
24. EK Yim RM Reano SW Pang AF Yee CS Chen KW Leong 2005 Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells Biomaterials. 26 5405 5413 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.058 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXivFKru7Y%3D (Pubitemid 40462355)
25. AS Curtis CD Wilkinson J Crossan C Broadley H Darmani KK Johal H Jorgensen W Monaghan 2005 An in vivo microfabricated scaffold for tendon repair Eur Cell Mater. 9 50 57 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtV2ktLbN (Pubitemid 41008178)
26. JD Foley E Grunwald PF Nealey CJ Murphy 2005 Cooperative modulation of neuritogenesis by PC12 cells by topography and nerve growth factor Biomaterials. 26 3639 3644 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.048 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFejsrvF (Pubitemid 40038158)
27. MJ Dalby SJ Yarwood MO Riehle HJ Johnstone S Affrossman AS Curtis 2002 Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopogrpahy: Morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high- polymer demixed islands Exp Cell Res. 276 2002 10.1006/excr.2002.5498 (Pubitemid 34948346)
28. EM Christenson JM Anderson A Hiltner 2004 Oxidative mechanisms of poly(carbonate urethane) and poly(ether urethane) biodegradation: In vivo and in vitro correlations J Biomed Mat Res A. 70 2 245 255 (Pubitemid 38988755)
29. CR Deeken DB Fox SL Bachman BJ Ramshaw SA Grant 2011 Characterization of bionanocomposite scaffolds comprised of amine-functionalized gold nanoparticles and silicon carbide nanowires crosslinked to an acellular porcine tendon J Biomed Mater Res B 99 1 142 149
30. CR Deeken DB Fox SL Bachman BJ Ramshaw SA Grant 2011 Assessment of the biocompatibility of two novel, bionanocomposite scaffolds in a rodent model J Biomed Mater Res B. 96B 2 351 359 10.1002/jbm.b.31778 1:CAS:528: DC%2BC3MXhtVejtA%3D%3D
31. Hermanson G. Preparation of colloidal-gold-labeled proteins, bioconjugate techniques. New York: Academic Press; 1996.
32. SF Badylak GC Lantz A Coffey LA Geddes 1989 Small intestinal submucosa as a large diameter vascular graft in the dog J Surg Res 47 74 80 10.1016/0022-4804(89)90050-4 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3psVGkuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 19183414)
33. http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/download.html.
34. CR Costello SL Bachman SA Grant DS Cleveland TS Loy BR Ramshaw 2007 Characterization of heavyweight and lightweight polypropylene prosthetic mesh explants from a single patient Surg Innov 14 3 168 176 10.1177/1553350607306356 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2sngsFGitA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 47490830)
35. WS Cobb JM Burns KW Kercher BD Matthews HJ Norton BT Heniford 2005 Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults J Surg Res 129 231 235 10.1016/j.jss.2005.06.015 (Pubitemid 41797057)
36. P Emans M Schreinemacher M Gijbels G Beets J-W Greve L Koole N Bouvy 2009 Polypropylene meshes to prevent abdominal herniation can stable coatings prevent adhesions in the long term? Ann Biomed Eng. 37 2 410 418 10.1007/s10439-008-9608-7