Contribution of cryopreservation in a mandatory SET policy: Analysis of 5 years of application of law in an academic IVF center

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1059-1066

  Salame, Yaacoub ^a   Devreker, Fabienne ^a,b   Imbert, Romain ^a   Delbaere, Anne ^a   Fontenelle, Nicolas ^b   Englert, Yvon ^a,b  

^a ERASME HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cryopreservation; Single embryo transfer; Twin pregnancies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BELGIUM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DELIVERY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FREEZE THAWING; HUMAN; LAW; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TWINS; UNIVERSITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BELGIUM; BIRTH RATE; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; PREGNANCY, TWIN; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84355162177     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-011-9642-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group 2000 Multiple gestation pregnancy Hum Reprod. 15 8 1856 1864 10.1093/humrep/15.8.1856
2. AN Andersen V Goossens AP Ferraretti S Bhattacharya R Felberbaum J de Mouzon KG Nygren 2008 Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE Hum Reprod. 23 756 771 18281243 10.1093/humrep/den014
3. JA Land JL Evers 2003 Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting Hum Reprod. 18 455 45 12571190 10.1093/humrep/deg081 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FmtVynsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36236287)
4. C Laruelle Y Englert 1995 Psychological study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer participants' attitudes toward the destiny of their supernumerary embryos Fertil Steril. 63 1047 50 7720916 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3jslChtA%3D%3D
5. CR Newton J Mc Bride V Feyles F Tekpetey S Power 2007 Factors affecting patients's attitudes toward single and multiple-embryo transfer Fertil Steril 87 269 78 17097648 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.043 (Pubitemid 46176926)
6. S Vilska A Tiitinen C Hyden-Granskog O Hovatta 1999 Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptabe pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth Hum Reprod 14 2392 5 10469718 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2392 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgtVOgsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29425437)
7. J Gerris D De Neubourg K Mangelschots E Van Royen 1999 Prevention of twin pregnancy after in IVF or ICSI based on strict embryo criteria : a prospective randomized clinical trial Hum Reprod 14 2581 7 10527991 10.1093/humrep/14.10. 2581 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlvFemtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29473933)
8. M Dhont 2001 Single embryo transfer Semin Reprod Med 19 251 8 11679906 10.1055/s-2001-18044 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrnt1amsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33044286)
9. E Surrey DK Gardner J Stevens D Minjarez A Leitz WB Schoolcraft 2002 Single blastocyst stage after in vitro fertilization (IVF): a prospective randomized trial Fertil Steril 78 Suppl 1 S42 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03489-1
10. J Gerris D De Neubourg K Mangelschots E Van Royen M Vercuyssen J Barudy-Vasquez 2002 Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme Hum Reprod 17 2626 31 12351539 10.1093/humrep/17.10.2626 (Pubitemid 35174113)
11. D Marek M Langley AC Nackley KM Doody KJ Doody 2002 Elective single embryo transfer in fresh cycles Fertil Steril 78 Suppl 1 S48 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03506-9
12. D Marek M Langley AC Nackley KM Doody KJ Doody 2002 Frozen embryo transfer of single blastocysts Fertil Steril 78 Suppl 1 S132 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03734-2
13. G Kovacs V MacLachlan L Rombauts D Healy D Howlett 2003 Replacement of one selected embryo is just as successful as two embryo transfer, without the risk of twin pregnancy Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 43 369 71 14717314 10.1046/j.0004-8666.2003.00125.x (Pubitemid 37304230)
14. H Martikainen A Tiitinen C Tomas, et al. 2001 One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomised study Hum Reprod 16 1900 3 11527895 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1900 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MritVejuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32916219)
15. A Tiitinen M Haltunen P Harkki 2001 Elective single-embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation Human Reprod 16 1140 4 10.1093/humrep/16.6.1140 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzhsVWhsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32544683)
16. Z Veleva P Karinen C Tomas J Tapanainen H Martikainen 2009 Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI Human Reprod 24 1632 1639 10.1093/humrep/dep042
17. F Devreker S Emiliani Ph Revelard M Van den Bergh I Govaerts Y Englert 1999 Comparison of two elective transfer policies of two embryos to reduce multiple prenancies without impairing pregnancy rates Human Reprod 14 83 9 10.1093/humrep/14.1.83 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzgt1egsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29046318)
18. F Puissant M Van Rysselberge P Barlow J Deweze F Leroy 1987 Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment Hum Reprod. 2 705 8 3437050 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7jvFKmuw%3D%3D
19. Z Veleva S Vilska C Hyden-granskog A Tiitinen JS Tapanaienen H Martikainen 2006 Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years Hum Reprod 2 2098 102 10.1093/humrep/del137 (Pubitemid 44288088)
20. A Thurin J Hausken T Hillensjo B Jablonowska, et al. 2004 Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization N Engl J med 351 2392 402 15575055 10.1056/NEJMoa041032 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2cXhtVCrtrvF (Pubitemid 40485991)
21. DK Gardner E Surrey D Minjarez A Leitz J Stevens WB Schoolcraft 2004 Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial Fertile Steril 81 551 555 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.023 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitFCrsbw%3D (Pubitemid 38376109)
22. HG Lukassen DD Braat AM Wetzels GA Zielhius EM Adang E Scheenjes JA Kremer 2005 Two cycles with Single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial Hum Reprod 20 702 708 15618254 10.1093/humrep/deh672 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7mtlOkug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40425497)
23. SA Roberts L McGowan W Mark Hirst A Vail A Rutherford BA Lieberman DR Brison 2011 The toward SET collaboration. Reducing the incidence of twins from IVF treatments: predictive modelling from a retrospective cohort Hum Reprod 26 3 569 75 21163856 10.1093/humrep/deq352
24. AP Van Montfoort AA Fiddelers JM Janssen JG Derhaag CD Dirksen GA Dunselman JA Land JP Geraedts JL Evers JC Dumoulin 2006 In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but Results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial Hum Reprod 21 338 343 16253973 10.1093/humrep/dei359 (Pubitemid 43159904)
25. DJ McLernon K Harrild C Bergh MJ Davies D de Neubourg JC Dumoulin J Gerris JA Kremer H Martikainen BW Mol RJ Norman A Thurin-Kjellberg A Tiitinen AP van Montfoort AM van Peperstraten E Van Royen S Bhattacharya 2010 Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials BMJ 341 6945 10.1136/bmj.c6945