In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes in relation to myometrial thickness

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1135-1140

  Youm, Hyun Sik ^a   Choi, Young Sik ^b   Han, Hyuck Dong ^a  

^a Wonju Severance Christian Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Adenomyosis; IVF ET outcome; Myometrial thickness; TVUS

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; ADENOMYOSIS; ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOMETRIUM; NIDATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THICKNESS; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ADULT; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; MYOMETRIUM; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84255214283     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-011-9640-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. A Kido A Togashi T Koyama T Yamaoka T Fugiwara S Fujii 2003 Diffusely enlarged uterus: evaluation with MR imaging Radiographics 23 1423 39 14615554 10.1148/rg.236035033 (Pubitemid 37487519)
2. IM Matalliotakis AI Kourtis DK Panidis 2003 Adenomyosis Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 30 63 82 12699258 10.1016/S0889-8545(02)00053-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s7otVegsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36356713)
3. PH Wang WH Su BC Sheu WM Liu 2009 Adenomyosis and its variance: adenomyoma and female fertility Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 48 232 8 19797011 10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60295-3
4. S Gordts JJ Brosens L Fusi G Benagiano I Brosens 2008 Uterine adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus classification Reprod Biomed Online 17 244 8 18681999 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60201-5
5. M Levgur 2007 Diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review J Reprod Med 52 177 93 17465285 (Pubitemid 46452119)
6. K Kepkep YA Tuncay G Göynümer E Tutal 2007 Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30 341 5 17659649 10.1002/uog.3985 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2srgslGhsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 47477223)
7. YL Sun CB Wang CY Lee TH Wun P Lin YH Lin, et al. 2010 Transvaginal sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of adenomyosis based on histopathologic correlation Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 49 40 4 20466291 10.1016/S1028-4559(10) 60007-1
8. M Dueholm E Lundorf 2007 Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19 505 12 18007126 10.1097/GCO. 0b013e3282f1bf00 (Pubitemid 350135432)
9. M Bazot A Cortez E Darai J Rouger J Chopier JM Antoine, et al. 2001 Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology Hum Reprod 16 2427 33 11679533 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrnt1SgtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33054150)
10. CA Hulka DA Hall K McCarthy J Simeone 2002 Sonographic findings in patients with adenomyosis: can sonography assist in predicting extent of disease? Am J Roentgenol 179 379 83 (Pubitemid 34785640)
11. C Reinhold F Tafazoli A Mehio L Wang M Atri ES Siegelman, et al. 1999 Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation Radiographics 19 S147 S160 10517451
12. F Zegers-Hochschild GD Adamson J de Mouzon O Ishihara R Mansour K Nygren, et al. 2009 International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009 Hum Reprod 24 2683 7 19801627 10.1093/humrep/dep343 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MjgtFaltQ%3D%3D
13. Anderson JR, Genadry R. Anatomy and embryology. In: Berek JS, editor. Berek & Novak's gynecology. 14th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p. 75-127.
14. Levi CS, Lyons EA, Holt SC, Dashefsky SM. Normal anatomy of the female pelvis and transvaginal sonography. In: Callen PW, editor. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008. p. 887-918.
15. P Traiman P Saldiva A Haiashi M Franco 1996 Criteria for the diagnosis of diffuse uterine myohypertrophy J Gynaecol Obstet 54 31 6 1:STN:280: DyaK28vktVGjtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26237908)
16. F Camargo J Gaytan C Caligara C Simón A Pellicer J Remohí 2001 Impact of ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis on recipients of sibling oocytes Fertil Steril 76 Suppl 1 S150 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02439-6
17. CH Chiang MY Chang CS Shiau HC Hou TT Hsieh YK Soong 1999 Effect of a sonographically diffusely enlarged uterus without distinct uterine masses on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer J Assist Reprod Genet 16 369 72 10459520 10.1023/A:1020593930366 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzovVyisA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29384078)
18. G Leyendecker G Kunz S Kissler L Wildt 2006 Adenomyosis and reproduction Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20 523 46 16520094 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006. 01.008 (Pubitemid 44767117)
19. R Devlieger T D'Hooghe D Timmerman 2003 Uterine adenomyosis in the infertility clinic Hum Reprod Update 9 139 47 12751776 10.1093/humupd/dmg010 (Pubitemid 36582602)
20. DL Olive RR Franklin LV Gratkins 1982 The association between endometriosis and spontaneous abortion. A retrospective clinical study J Reprod Med 27 333 8 7120211 1:STN:280:DyaL3s%2FgvF2ltA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 12043018)
21. H Ota S Igarashi J Hatazawa T Tanaka 1998 Is adenomyosis an immune disease? Hum Reprod Update 4 360 7 9825851 10.1093/humupd/4.4.360 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FktFahtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28486802)
22. NJ Raine-Fenning BK Campbell NR Kendall JS Clewes IR Johnson 2004 Endometrial and subendometrial perfusion are impaired in women with unexplained subfertility Hum Reprod 19 2605 14 15465835 10.1093/humrep/deh459 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crisFKltQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39481289)
23. LW Chien HK Au PL Chen J Xiao CR Tzeng 2002 Assessment of uterine receptivity by the endometrial-subendometrial blood flow distribution pattern in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer Fertil Steril 78 245 51 12137858 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03223-5 (Pubitemid 34831723)
24. J Zaidi S Campbell R Tittrof SL Tan 1995 Endometrial thickness, morphology, vascular penetration and velocimetry in predicting implantation in an in vitro fertilization program Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 6 191 8 8521069 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06030191.x 1:STN:280:DyaK287gslyisw%3D%3D