Physical characterization of new advanced drought tolerant common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) lines for canning quality

American Journal of Food Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 22-28

  Gathu, E W ^a   Karuri, E G ^a   Njage, P M K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Canning; Dry bean; Leaching properties; Varieties; Water uptake

Indexed keywords

BULK DENSITY; COMMON BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS); DRY BEANS; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; LEACHING CHARACTERISTICS; LEACHING RATES; PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION; SEED MASS; SEED SIZE; VARIETIES; VOLUME CHANGE; WATER UPTAKE;

CANNING; DROUGHT; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; SEED;

LEACHING;

EID: 84255167956     PISSN: 15574571     EISSN: 1557458X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/ajft.2012.22.28     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Basra, A.S., 2006. Handbook of Seed Science and Technology. Haworth Press, Inc., Binghamton, NY, ISBN: 1560223146, pages: 625.
2. Bayram, M, A. Kaya and M.D. Oner, 2004. Changes in properties of soaking water during production of soy-bulgur. J. Food Eng,: 221-230.
3. Firatligil-Durmus, E, E. Sarka, Z. Bubnik, M. Schejbal and P. Kadlec, 2010. Size properties of legume seeds of different varieties using image analysis. J. Food Eng, 99: 445-451.
4. Ghaderi, A, G.L. Hosfield, M.W. Adams and M.A. Uebersax, 1984. Variability in culinary quality, component interrelationships & breeding implications in navy and pinto beans. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci, 109: 85-90.
5. Hampton, J.G, K.A. Johnstone and V. Eua-Umpton, 1992. Bulk conductivity test variables for mungbean, soybean and French bean seeds lots. Seed Sci. Technol, 20: 677-686.
6. Hosfield, G.L. and G.V. Varner, 1984. Processing quality evaluation of Michigan dry beans. Mich. Dry Bean Dig, 9: 10-11.
7. Hosfield, G.L. and M.A. Uebersax, 1980. Variability in physiochemical properties and nutritional components of tropical and domestic dry bean germplasm. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci, 105: 246-252.
8. Hosfield, G.L, 1991. Genetic control of production and food quality factors in dry bean. Food Technol, 45: 98-103.
9. Hosfield, G.L, M.A. Uebersax and L.G. Occena, 2000. Technological and genetic improvements in dry bean quality and utilization. Proceedings of the Idaho Bean Workshop, August 3-4, 2000, University of Idaho, Moscow, pp: 135-152.
10. Joshi, D.C, S.D. Das and R.K. Mukherjee, 1993. Physical properties of pumpkin seeds. J. Agric. Eng. Res, 54: 219-229.
11. Lucas T, D.L. Ray and F. Mariette, 2007. Kinetics of water absorption and solute leaching during soaking of breakfast cereals. J. Food Eng, 80: 377-384.
12. Shellie-Dessert, K.C. and F.A. Bliss, 1991. Genetic Improvement of Food Quality Factors. In: Common Bean Research for Crop Improvement, Van Schooven M. and O. Voysest (Eds.). Redwood Press, United Kingdom, pp: 649-671.
13. Taiwo, K.A, C.T. Akanbi and O.O. Ajibola, 1998. Regression relationships for the soaking and cooking properties of two cowpea varieties. J. Food Eng, 37: 331-344.
14. Uebersax, M.A. and S. Ruengsakulrach, 1989. Utilization of Field Beans, Peas and Lentils in Vegetable Protein Utilization. In: Human Foods and Animal Feedstuff, Applewhite, T.H. (Ed.). AOCS, Champaign, IL, pp: 123-130.
15. Uebersax, M.A, 2006. Dry edible beans: Indigenous staple and healthy cuisine (Report). Forum on Public Policy.
16. Uebersax, M.A, S. Ruengsakulrach and L.G. Occena, 1991. Strategies and procedures for processing dry beans. Food Technol, 45: 104-108.
17. Van loggerenberg, M, 2004. Development and application of a small-scale canning procedure for the evaluation of small white beans (phaseolus vulgaris). Ph.D Thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein.
18. Wassimi, N.N, G.L. Hosfield and M.A. Uebersax, 1990. Inheritance of physic-chemical seed characteristics related to culinary quality in dry bean. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci, 115: 492-499.