Leadership of scientists and engineers: A three-vector model

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 140-147

  Robledo, Issac C ^a   Peterson, David R ^a   Mumford, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Creativity; Innovation; Leadership; Management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84255163103     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.739     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barnowe, T. (1975). Leadership and performance outcomes in research organizations: The supervisor of scientists as a source of assistance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 264-280.
2. Bird, B., & Sherwin, M. J. (2005). American Prometheus: The triumph and tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: Random House.
3. Buijis, J. (2007). Innovation leaders should be controlled schizophrenics. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 203-210.
4. Byrne, C. L., Mumford, M. D., Barrett, J. D., & Vessey, W. B. (2009). Examining the leaders of creative efforts: What do they do, and what do they think about? Creativity and Innovation Management, 18, 256-268.
5. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
6. Elkins, T., & Keller, R. T. (2003). Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 587-606.
7. Engwall, M., Kling, R., & Werr, A. (2005). Models in action: How management models are interpreted in new product development. R&D Management, 35, 427-439.
8. Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273-296). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influences of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 130-149.
10. Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69-90.
11. Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of idea appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 231-246.
12. Mumford, M. D., & Hunter, S. T. (2005). Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective on creativity. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues, Vol. IV (pp. 11-74). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
13. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5, 213-240.
14. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (2002). Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: The many faces of multi-level issues (pp. 3-63). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
15. Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B. H., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705-750.
16. Mumford, M. D., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Hunter, S. T. (2008). Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective. In M. D. Mumford, S. T. Hunter, & K. Bedell-Avers (Eds.), Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective (pp. 107-154). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
17. Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591-620.
18. Verhaeghe, A., & Kfir, R. (2002). Managing innovation in a knowledge intensive technology organization (KITO). R&D Management, 32, 409-417.