How to measure the overall energy savings linked to policies and energy services at the national level?

Energy Efficiency

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 19-35

  Thomas, Stefan ^a   Boonekamp, Piet ^b   Vreuls, Harry ^c   Broc, Jean Sébastien ^d   Bosseboeuf, Didier ^e   Lapillonne, Bruno ^f   Labanca, Nicola ^g  

^a Institute for Ecological Economy Research   (Germany)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

^c NL Agency   (Netherlands)

^d ECOLE DES MINES DE NANTES   (France)

^e Agence de l'environnement et de la maitrise de l'energie (ADEME)   (France)

^f ENERDATA SAS   (France)

^g POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bottom up evaluation methods; Energy end use efficiency; Energy services; Harmonised calculation system; National scale energy savings calculation; Policies and measures; Top down evaluation methods

Indexed keywords

BOTTOM-UP EVALUATIONS; END-USES; ENERGY SERVICES; HARMONISED CALCULATION SYSTEM; POLICIES AND MEASURES; TOP-DOWN EVALUATIONS;

ELECTROSTATIC DEVICES; ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE; ENERGY CONSERVATION; INTERNATIONAL LAW;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY USE; EUROPEAN UNION; MEASUREMENT METHOD; POTENTIAL ENERGY; TOP-DOWN APPROACH;

EUROPE;

EID: 84155195777     PISSN: 1570646X     EISSN: 15706478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12053-011-9122-x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boonekamp, P. G. M. (2010). How much will the Energy Service Directive contribute to EU energy and emissions goals? Energy efficiency. doi: 10. 1007/s12053-010-9088-0.
2. Boonekamp, P. G. M., & Thomas, S. (2009). Harmonised and integrated bottom-up and top-down methods to evaluate the ESD energy savings. Report from the EMEEES project. Wuppertal: ECN, Petten and Wuppertal Institute.
3. Broc, J. S., Osso, D., Baudry, P., Adnot, J., Bodineau, L., Bourges, B. (2010). Consistency of the French white certificates evaluation system with the framework proposed for the European energy services. Energy efficiency. doi: 10. 1007/s12053-010-9100-8.
4. Broc, J.-S., Adnot, J., Bourges, B., Thomas, S., & Vreuls, H. (2009). The development process for harmonised bottom-up evaluation methods of energy savings. Nantes: Ecole des Mines de Nantes.
5. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). (2006). California energy efficiency evaluation protocols: technical, methodological, and reporting requirements for evaluation professionals. Report prepared by the TecMarket Works Team. San Francisco: CPUC.
6. CWA. (2007). CEN Workshop Agreement CWA 15693. April 2007. Saving lifetimes of energy efficiency improvement measures in bottom-up calculations. Brussels: CEN.
7. European Commission (EC). (2006). Action plan for energy efficiency: realising the potential. Communication from the commission COM(2006) 545 final. Brussels: European Commission.
8. EVO. (2010). International performance measurement and verification protocol (IPVMP). Vol 1: Concepts and options for determining energy and water savings. Washington, D. C.: Efficiency Valuation Organization.
9. Horowitz, M. J. (2011). Measuring the savings from energy efficiency policies: a step beyond program evaluation. Energy Efficiency 4: 43-56.
10. Lapillonne, B., Bosseboeuf, D., & Thomas, S. (2009). Top-down evaluation methods of energy savings, summary report. Enerdata, Grenoble, ADEME, Paris. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.
11. Lapillonne, B., & Desbrosses, N. (2009). Top-down evaluation methods of energy savings. Case studies summary report. Grenoble: Enerdata.
12. Michals, J., Titus, E. (2006). The need for and approaches to developing common protocols to measure, track, and report energy efficiency savings in the northeast. In: Proceeding of the ACEEE (American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy) 2006 Summer Study, 13-18 August 2006, Pacific Grove, pp. 8. 179-8. 190.
13. SRCI, NOVEM, Electricity Association, MOTIVA, Norsk Enok og Energi AS, Centre for Energy Conservation of Portugal, Elkraft system, SEVEn, Energy Saving Trust, Wuppertal Institute (2001). A European ex-post evaluation guidebook for DSM and EE service programmes. SAVE Project No. XVII/4. 1031/P/99-028, April 2001.
14. TecMarket Works, Megdal and Associates, Architectural Energy Corporation, RLW Analytics, et al. (2004). The California evaluation framework. Report prepared for the Southern California Edison Company as mandated by the California Public Utilities Commission, K2033910, revised September 2004. http://www. calmac. org/toolkitevaluator. asp. Accessed 21 April 2011.
15. Vine, E. (2008). Breaking down the silos: the integration of energy efficiency, renewable energy, demand response and climate change. Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 49-63.
16. Vine, E., Sathaye, J. (1999). Guidelines for the monitoring, evaluation, reporting, verification and certification of energy-efficiency projects for climate change mitigation. Report prepared for the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, LBNL-41543, March 1999.
17. Vreuls, H., De Groote, W., Bach, P., Schalburg, R., Dyhr-Mikkelsen, K., Bosseboeuf, D., Celi, O., Kim, J., Neij, L., Roosenburg, M. (2005). Evaluating energy efficiency policy measures and DSM programmes, vol I: evaluation guidebook. Report for the IEA-DSM task IX, October 2005. http://www. ieadsm. org/Files/EXCO%20File%20Library/Key%20Publications/Volume1Total. pdf. Accessed 21 April 2011.
18. Vreuls, H., Thomas, S., & Broc, J.-S. (2009). General bottom-up data collection, monitoring, and calculation methods. Summary report. SenterNovem, Sittard. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.
19. Wuppertal Institute on behalf of the EMEEES Consortium. (2009). Measuring and reporting energy savings for the Energy Services Directive-how it can be done. Results and recommendations from the EMEEES project. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.