Breaking down the silos: The integration of energy efficiency, renewable energy, demand response and climate change

Energy Efficiency

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 49-63

  Vine, Edward ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Demand response; Energy efficiency; Evaluation; Integration; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

DEMAND RESPONSE; ENERGY CULTURES;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

EID: 70350573799     PISSN: 1570646X     EISSN: 15706478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12053-008-9004-z     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Anderson, R., Hammon, R., & Keesee, M. (2007). Maximizing the benefits of zero-energy homes. Home Energy (Solar & Efficiency Special Issue), 42-47.
2. Barros, C. & Segerstrom, C. (2007). The California solar initiative. Home energy (Solar & Efficiency Special Issue), 6-8.
3. California Independent System Operator [CAISO] (2007). 2007 Summer loads and resources operations assessment. Folsom, CA: CAISO.
4. California Public Utilities Commission [CPUC] (2006). California energy efficiency evaluation protocols: Technical, methodological and reporting requirements for evaluation professionals. San Francisco, CA: California Public Utilities Commission.
5. California Public Utilities Commission [CPUC] (2007a). Order instituting rulemaking, Rulemaking 07-01-041, Jan. 25, 2007. San Francisco, CA: California Public Utilities Commission.
6. California Public Utilities Commission [CPUC] (2007b). Order approving pilot water conservation programs within the energy utilities' energy efficiency programs, Decision 07-12-050, December 20, 2007. San Francisco, CA: California Public Utilities Commission.
7. Chen, C., Wiser, R., & Bolinger, M. (2007). Weighing the costs and benefits of state renewables portfolio standards: A comparative analysis of state-level policy impact projections, LBNL-61580. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
8. Clean Development Mechanism, Executive Board [CDM] (2004). Sixteenth Meeting (Oct. 21, 2004) Report. CDM-EB-16. Retrieved from cdm.unfccc.int/ index.html.
9. Dowd, J., Jordan, G., Reed, J., & Vine, E. (2005). Are federal energy technology programs assessing the 'Magic in the Middle'? Proceedings of the 2005 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Brooklyn, NY: International Energy Program Evaluation Conference.
10. Geller, H. (2006). Catching up: Progress with utility energy efficiency programs in the Southwest. Proceedings of the 2006 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.
11. Gregoire, C., Meissner, J., Gonzales, Pl., & Engel, V. (2007). New evaluation framework: Turning the silo on its side. Proceedings of the 2007 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference. Brooklyn, NY: International Energy Program Evaluation Conference.
12. Holt, E., Wiser, R., & Bolinger, M. (2006). Who owns renewable energy certificates? An exploration of policy options and practice. Report LBNL-59965. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
13. Hopper, N., Goldman, C., & Schlegel, J. (2006). Energy efficiency in western utility resource plans: Impacts on regional resource assessment and support for WGA policies. Report LBNL-58271. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis, summary for policymakers. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
15. International Energy Agency, Implementing Agreement on Demand-Side Management Technologies and Programmes [IEA] (2005). Evaluating energy efficiency policy measures & DSM programmes, Vol. 1, evaluation guidebook. Paris: International Energy Agency.
16. ISO New England, Inc. [ISO-NE] (2007). Manual for measurement and verification of demand reduction value from demand resources. Holyoke, MA: ISO New England.
17. Keating, K. (2007). What is the purpose of net savings? A northwest perspective. Paper presented at the 17th National Energy Services Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
18. Kushler, M., York, D., & Vine, E. (2005). Energy-efficiency measures alleviate T&D constraints. Transmission and Distribution World, 57 (4), 32-41.
19. Michals, J., & Titus, E. (2006). The need for and approaches to developing common protocols to measure, track, and report energy efficiency savings in the Northeast. Proceedings of the 2006 ACEEE Summer Study, pp. 8-179 to 8-190. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
20. National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency[NAPEE] (2007). Model energy efficiency program impact evaluation guide. Piedmont, CA: Schiller Consulting, Inc (Prepared by Steven R. Schiller).
21. National Commission on Energy Policy (2004). Ending the energy stalemate: A bipartisan strategy to meet America's energy challenges. Washington, DC: National Commission on Energy Policy.
22. Northwest Power and Conservation Council [NPPC] (2005). The Fifth Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Plan. Portland, OR: Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
23. Northwest Power and Conservation Council [NPPC] (2007). Issues for the Sixth Pacific Northwest Power and Conservation Plan. Portland, OR: Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
24. Pacala, S., & Socolow, R. (2004). Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 305, 968-972.
25. Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2004). The 10-50 solution: Technologies and policies for a low-carbon future. Washington, DC: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
26. PIER Demand Response Research Center [PIER DRRC] (2007). Research opportunity notice DRRC RON-03: Understanding customer behavior to improve demand response delivery in California. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
27. Prindle, B., Eldridge, M., Eckhardt, M., & Frederick, A. (2007). The twin pillars of sustainable energy: Synergies between energy efficiency and renewable energy technology and policy. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
28. Reed, J., Jordan, G., & Vine, E. (2007). Impact evaluation framework for technology deployment programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy.
29. Summit Blue Consulting, LLC & Quantum Consulting, Inc. (2006). Draft Version 1: Protocols for Estimating the Load Impacts from DR Programs. Prepared for Working Group 2 Measurement and Evaluation Committee, Boulder, CO.
30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (2007). Creating an energy efficiency and renewable energy set-aside in the NOx budget trading program: Evaluation, measurement, and verification of electricity savings for determining emission reductions from energy efficiency and renewable energy actions. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
31. Vang, S., & Hammon, R. (2007). Energy efficiency and solar electricity go hand in hand. Home Energy (Solar & Efficiency Special Issue), 30-35.
32. Vine, E. (2003). Opportunities for promoting energy efficiency in buildings as an air quality compliance approach. Energy, 28 (4), 319-341.
33. Vine, E. (2007). Closing the loop between evaluators and implementers & innovation and experimental design. Presented at the Behavior, Energy, and Climate Change Conference, sponsored by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, the California Institute for Energy and Environment, and the Precourt Institute for Energy Efficiency, Sacramento, CA, November 9, 2007.
34. Vine, E., Kats, G., Sathaye, J., & Joshi, H. (2003). International greenhouse gas trading programs: A discussion of measurement and accounting issues. Energy Policy, 31 (3), 211-224.
35. Vine, E., Kushler, M., & York, D. (2007). Energy myth ten - energy efficiency measures are unreliable, unpredictable, and unenforceable. In B. K. Sovacool & M. A. Brown (Eds.), Energy and American society - thirteen myths. New York: Springer.
36. Vine, E., & Sathaye, J. (1999). An overview of guidelines and issues for the monitoring, evaluation, verification, and certification of energy-efficiency projects for climate change mitigation. LBNL-43083. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
37. Violette, D., & Hungerford, D. (2007). Development of California protocols for estimating the load impacts from DR Programs and cost-effectiveness methods, Proceedings of the 2007 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Chicago, IL.
38. Western Governors' Association [WGA] (2004). WGA Policy Resolution 04-14: Clean and Diversified Energy Initiative for the West, June 22, 2004. Santa Fe, NM: Western Governors' Association.
39. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development [WRI & WBCSD] (2005). GHG protocol for project accounting. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
40. York, D., Kushler, M., & Witte, P. (2007). Examining the peak demand impacts of energy efficiency: A review of program experience and industry practices. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.