State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Environmental health

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 40-55

  Pohjola, M V ^a   Leino, O ^a   Kollanus, V ^a   Tuomisto, J T ^a   Gunnlaugsdottir H ^b   Holm, F ^c   Kalogeras, N ^d   Luteijn, J M ^e   Magnusson S H ^b   Odekerken, G ^d   Tijhuis, M J ^d,f   Ueland, O ^g   White, B C ^e   Verhagen, H ^e,f,h  

^a NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b Matis ohf Iceland   (Iceland)

^c FoodGroup Denmark and Nordic NutriScience   (Denmark)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^g NOFIMA   (Norway)

^h MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Benefit risk assessment; Environmental health; Impact assessment; Integrated assessment

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY;

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84155189184     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: 18736351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.004     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Briggs D.J. A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks. Environmental Health 2008, 7:61. 10.1186/1476-069X-7-61.
2. Cress U., Kimmerle J. A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge bulding with wikis. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2008, 3:105-122. 10.1007/s11412-007-9035-z.
3. ECHA, 2008a. Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Guidance for the implementation of REACH. European Chemicals Agency.
4. ECHA 2008b. Guidance on Socio-Economic Analysis - Restrictions. Guidance for the implementation of REACH. European Chemicals Agency.
5. Hakkarainen K., Paavola S. Toward a trialogical approach to learning. Transformation of Knowledge Through Classroom Interaction 2009, 65-80. Routledge, London. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, R. Hershkowitz (Eds.).
6. IAEA, 2010. IAEA safety standards for safety assessment. International Atomic Energy Agency. Available: http://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/ni/training/safety_standards_presentations/IAEA%20Safety%20Standards%20for%20Safety%20Assessment.pdf.
7. IRGC, 2005. Risk governance - towards an integrative approach. International Risk Governance Council, Geneva. Available: http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_WP_No_1_Risk_Governance__reprinted_version_.pdf.
8. Jantunen J., Hokkanen P. YVA-lainsäädännön toimivuusarviointi - Ympäristövaikutusten arviointimenettelyn toimivuus ja kehittämistarpeet (Evaluation of the existing EIA legislation - how EIA procedures function in practice and areas needing improvement) 2010, Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland.
9. Knol, A., 2010. Health and the environment: assessing the impacts, addressing the uncertainties. Thesis Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
10. NRC Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Progress 1983, The National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
11. NRC Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society 1996, The National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
12. NRC Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment 2009, The National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
13. OECD, 2003. Emerging Systemic Risks. Final Report to the OECD Futures Project. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
14. Paavola S., Hakkarainen K. From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts - a trialogical approach to CSCL. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices: CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings 2009, 83-92. International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS), Rhodes, Creek. C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.).
15. Pohjola V.J. Fundamentals of safety conscious process design. Safety Science 2003, 41:181-208.
16. Pohjola V.J. Formalizing waste management. Modern Formal Methods and Applications 2006, 47-82. Springer, Dordrecht. H.A. Gabbar (Ed.).
17. Pölönen I., Hokkanen P., Jalava K. The effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system - what works, what doesn't, and what could be improved. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2010, 31:120-128. 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.003.
18. SAIC, 2006. Life cycle assessment: Principles and practices. Scientific Applications International Corporation. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio. Available: http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/lcaccess/pdfs/600r06060.pdf.
19. Tapscott D., Williams A.D. Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything 2007, Penguin Group.
20. Tijhuis, M.J., Gunnlaugsdóttir H., Holm, F., Kalogeras, N., Leino, O., Luteijn, J.M., Magnússon, S.H., Odekerken, G., Pohjola, M.V., Tuomisto, J.T., Ueland, Ø., White, B.C., Verhagen, H., This issue. State of the Art in Benefit-Risk Analysis: Food and Nutrition. Food Chemical Toxicology. This issue.
21. Tuomisto J.T., Pohjola M.V. Open Risk Assessment - a new way of providing information for decision-making. Publications of the National Public Health Institute B18/2007 2007, KTL - National Public Health Institute, Kuopio.
22. van Kerkhoff L., Lebel L. Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2006, 31:445-477. 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102405.170850.
23. WHO, 1999. Health Impact Assessment (HIA), Main concepts and suggested approach. Gothenburg consensus paper. World Health Organization, Brussels.