Fragrance material review on cycloheptadeca-9-en-1-one

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 49, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2011, Pages

  McGinty, D ^a   Letizia, C S ^a   Api, A M ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR FRAGRANCE MATERIALS   (United States)

Author keywords

Fragrance ingredient; Review

Indexed keywords

CYCLOHEPTADECA 9 EN 1 ONE; FRAGRANCE; KETONE DERIVATIVE; MACROCYCLIC COMPOUND; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACUTE TOXICITY; EYE IRRITATION; HUMAN; LD 50; NONHUMAN; PATCH TEST; PHOTOTOXICITY; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; EYE INJURIES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; KETONES; MACROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS; MUCOUS MEMBRANE; ODORS; PERFUME; SKIN; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 84155165287     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: 18736351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.032     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Arctander, S., 1969. Perfume and Flavor Chemicals (Aroma Chemicals), vol. I. No. 700. Montclair, New Jersey.
2. Belsito D., Bickers D., Bruze M., Calow P., Dagli M., Fryer A.D., Greim H., Hanifin J.H., Miyachi Y., Saurat J.H., Sipes I.G. A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of macrocylic ketones and derivatives when used as fragrance ingredients. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2011, 49(Suppl 2):S219-S241.
3. Cadby P., Troy W., Vey M. Consumer Exposure to Fragrance Ingredients: Providing Estimates for Safety Evaluation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2002, 36:246-252.
4. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 2010. Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v 4.00. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
5. FEMA (Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association), 1970. Recent progress in the consideration of flavoring ingredients under the Food Additives Amendment 8. GRAS substances, Food Technology, 28(9), 76-80.
6. Ford R., Domeyer B., Easterday O., Maier K., Middleton J. Criteria for Development of a database for safety evaluation of fragrance ingredients. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2000, 31:166-181.
7. IFRA (International Fragrance Association), 2008. Use Level Survey, December 2008.
8. IFRA (International Fragrance Association), 2007. Volume of Use Survey, September 2007.
9. JECFA (Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives), 2004. Safety evaluation of certain food additives. Who Food Additives Series: 54. Prepared by the Sixty-third meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), World Health Organization, Geneva 2004.
10. Kligman A.M. The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test. A procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1966, 47:393-409.
11. Kligman A.M., Epstein W. Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1975, 1:231-239.
12. RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc.), 1974a. Acute toxicity studies. RIFM report number 1778, December 10 (RIFM, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA).
13. RIFM (Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc.), 1974b. Report on human maximization studies. RIFM report number 1779, November 19 (RIFM, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA).
14. Ogoshi, K., Tanaka, N.,Sekine, A., 1980. A study on the phototoxicity of musk type fragrances. unpublished, A paper presented at S.C.C.J., Nov., 17, 1980, 1-7.
15. Ohkoshi K., Watanabe A., Tanaka N. Phototoxicity of musks in perfumery. Journal Society Cosmetic Chemists, Japan. 1981, 15(3):207-213.
16. Opdyke D. Fragrance raw materials monographs. Civetone. Food and Chemical Toxicology 1976, 14(3):727.
17. Takenaka, T., E.Hasegawa, U.Takenaka, F.Saito and T.Odaka, 1986. Fundamental studies of safe compound perfumes for cosmetics. Part 1. The primary irritation of compound materials to the skin, Unknown Source, pp. 313-329.