Doing and reporting a neuropsychological assessment

International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 123-141

  Jurado, María Ángeles ^a   Pueyo, Roser ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Administration; Interpretation; Neuropsychological assessment; Neuropsychological tests; Theoretical study

Indexed keywords

EID: 84055217961     PISSN: 16972600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ardila, A., Rosselli, M., Ostrosky-Solís, F., Marcos, J., Granda, G., and Soto, M. (2000). Syntactic comprehension, verbal memory, and calculation abilities in Spanish-English bilinguals. Applied Neuropsychology, 7, 3-16.
2. Artiola i Fortuny, L., Garolera, M., Hermosillo Romo, D., Feldman, E., Fernández Barillas, H., Keefe, R., Lemaître, M.J., Ortiz Martín, A., Mirsky, A., Monguió, I., Morote, G., Parchment, S., Parchment, L.J., Da Pena, E., Politis, D.G., Sedó, M.A., Taussik, I., Valdivia, F., De Valdivia, L.E., and Verger Maestre, K. (2005). Research with spanishspeaking populations in the United States: Lost in the translation. A commentary and a plea. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 555-564.
3. Axelrod, B., Heilbronner, R., Barth, J., Larrabee, G., Faust, D., Pliskin, N., Fisher, J., and Silver, C. (2000). The use of neuropsychology test technicians in clinical practice: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 381-382.
4. Baron, I.S. (2004). Neuropsychological Evaluation of the Child. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., and Anderson, S.W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
6. Benedict, R.H. and Zgaljardic, D.J. (1998). Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 339-352.
7. Benedict, R.H., Fischer, J.S., Archibald, C.J., Arnett, P.A., Beatty, W.W., Bobholz, J., Chelune, G.J., Fisk, J.D., Langdon, D.W., Caruso, L., Foley, F., LaRocca, N.G., Vowels, L., Weinstein, A., DeLuca, J., Rao, S.M., and Munschauer, F. (2002). Minimal neuropsychological assessment of MS patients: A consensus approach. Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 381-397.
8. Blázquez-Alisente, J.L., González-Rodríguez, B., and Paúl-Lapedriza, N. (2008). Evaluación neuropsicológica. In J. Tirapu Ustárroz, M. Rios Lago, and F. Maeztu Unturbe (Eds.), Manual de Neuropsicología (pp. 33-56). Barcelona: Viguera Editores, S.L.
9. Boake, C. (2008). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. Clinical Neuropsychology, 39, 234-239.
10. Bobenrieth Astete, M.A. (2002). Normas para revisión de artículos originales en Ciencias de la Salud. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2, 509-523.
11. Bush, S.S. (2010). Determining whether or when to adopt new versions of psychological and neuropsychological tests: Ethical and professional considerations. Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 7-16.
12. Carretero-Dios, H. and Pérez, C. (2007). Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection in psychological research. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 863-882.
13. Executive Committee of division 40 of the APA. (1989). Definition of a clinical neuropsychologist: The following statement was adopted by the executive committee of division 40 at the APA meeting on August 12, 1988. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3, 22.
14. Falautano, M. (2010). Neuropsychological assessment: Experimental and clinical research. Neurological Sciences, 31, S223-S226.
15. Fernández-Ríos, L. and Buela-Casal, G. (2009). Standards for the preparation and writing of Psychology review articles. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 329-344.
16. Fischer, J.S., Rudick, R.A., Cutter, G.R., and Reingold, S.C. (1999). The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Measure (MSFC): An integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. National MS Society Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force. Multiple Sclerosis, 5, 244-250.
17. Grant, I. and Adams, K.M. (2009). Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric and neuromedical disorders (3a. ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Heaton, R.K., Miller, S.W., Taylor, M.J., and Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults: Professional manual. Lutz, F.L.: Psychological Assessment Resources.
19. Heilbronner, R.L., Sweet, J.J., Morgan, J.E., Larrabee, G.J., and Millis, S.R. (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. Clinical Neuropsychology, 23, 1093-1129.
20. Joy, S., Fein, D., Kaplan, E., and Freedman, M. (2001). Quantifying qualitative features of Block Design performance among healthy older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 157-170.
21. Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., and Loring, D.W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4a. ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
22. McCaffrey, R.J., Duff, K., and Westervelt, H.J. (2000). Practitioner's Guide to Evaluating Change with Neuropsychological Assessment Instruments. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher.
23. Mckenna, P. and Warrington, E.K. (2009). The analytical approach to neuropsychological assessment. In I. Grant and K. M. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric and neuromedical disorders (3a. ed.) (pp. 25-41). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Mitrushina, M., Boone, K.B., Razani, J., and D'Elia, L.F. (2005). Handbook of normative data for neuropsychological assessment (2a. ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Moltó, J.M., Igual, B., Pastor, I., González-Aniorte, R., and Asensio, M. (1997). Test de acentuación de palabras de González-Montalvo en una población sana. Revista de Neurología, 25, 2062-2063.
26. Nicholson, K., Martelli, M.F., and Zasler, N.D. (2001). Does pain confound interpretation of neuropsychological test results? NeuroRehabilitation, 16, 225-230.
27. Nuechterlein, K.H., Green, M.F., Kern, R.S., Baade, L.E., Barch, D.M., Cohen, J.D., Essock, S., Fenton, W.S., Frese, F.J., Gold, J.M., Goldberg, T., Heaton, R.K., Keefe, R.S., Kraemer, H., Mesholam-Gately, R., Seidman, L.J., Stover, E., Weinberger, D.R., Young, A.S., Zalcman, S., and Marder, S.R. (2008). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: Test selection, reliability, and validity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 203-213.
28. Ogden-Epker, M. and Cullum, C.M. (2001). Quantitative and qualitative interpretation of neuropsychological data in the assessment of temporal lobectomy candidates. Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 183-195.
29. Peña-Casanova, J., Blesa, R, Aguilar, M., Gramunt-Fombuena, N., Gómez-Ansón, B., Oliva, R., Molinuevo, J.L., Robles, A., Barquero, M.S., Antúnez, C., Martínez-Parra, C., Frank-García, A., Fernández, M., Alfonso, V., and Sol, J.M. (2009). Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): Methods and sample characteristics. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 307-319.
30. Porech, A.M. (2000). The quantified process approach: An emerging methodology to neuropsychological assessment. Clinical Neuropsychology, 14, 212-222.
31. Rey, A. (2003). REY, Test de copia y de reproducción de memoria de figuras geométricas complejas (8a. ed.). Madrid: TEA.
32. Rodríguez, M. (2009). Evaluación Neuropsicológica. In C. Junqué and J. Barroso (Eds.), Manual de neuropsicología (pp. 283-301). Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.
33. Sirigu, A., Zalla, T., Pillon, B., Grafman, J., Agid, Y., and Dubois, B. (1995). Selective impairments in managerial knowledge following pre-frontal cortex damage. Cortex, 31, 301-316.
34. Strauss, E., Sherman, E.M.S., and Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests (3a. ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Sweet, J.J., Nelson, N.W., and Moberg, P.J. (2006). The TCN/AACN 2005 «salary survey»: Professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. neuropsychologists. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 325-364.
36. Tate, R.L. (2010). A compendium of Tests, Scales and Questionnaires. The practitioner's Guide to measuring outcomes after acquired brain impairment. New York: Psychology Press.
37. Taylor, M.J. and Heaton, R.K. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of WAIS-III/WMS-III demographically corrected factor scores in neuropsychological assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 867-874.
38. Virués-Ortega, J. and Moreno-Rodríguez, R. (2008). Guidelines for clinical case reports in behavioral clinical Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 8, 765-777.
39. Wilson, B.A., Watson, P.C., Baddeley, A.D., Emslie, H., and Evans, J.J. (2000). Improvement or simply practice? The effects of twenty repeated assessments on people with and without brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 469-479.