Advancing neuromodulation using a dynamic control framework

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 671-674

  Afshar, Pedram ^a   Wei, Xuan ^a   Lazarewicz, MacIej ^a   Gupta, Rahul ^b   Molnar, Greg ^b   Denison, Timothy ^a  

^a Neuroengineering Group of Medtronic Neuromodulation Technology   (United States)

^b Neuromodulation Research at Medtronic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTUATION METHODS; CLASSICAL DYNAMICS; CLINICAL DATA; DOMINANT FACTOR; DYNAMIC CONTROLS; DYNAMIC PROPERTY; ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES; LOW POWER; NEURAL PROCESS; NEURAL STIMULATIONS; NEURAL STIMULATOR; NEUROMODULATION; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; RESEARCH SYSTEM; STATE ESTIMATORS; SYSTEM FRAMEWORK;

CONTROL SYSTEMS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ESTIMATION; OBSERVABILITY; PLANTS (BOTANY); RESEARCH; SENSORS;

STATE ESTIMATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; SHEEP;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; SHEEP;

EID: 84055211999     PISSN: 1557170X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090150     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. F. Yoshida et al.; Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 885-889, 2010.
2. Rosa, M.; et al; Exp Neurol. Vol 222. No. 2. pp. 184-90. Apr 2010.
3. Paralikar, K.; et al. "An Implantable Optical Stimulation Delivery System for Actuating an Excitable Biosubstrate," Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of , vol.46, no.1, pp.321-332, Jan. 2011
4. Diester, I.; Kaufman, M.T.; Mogri, M.; Pashaie, R.; Goo, W.; Yizhar, O.; Ramakrishnan, C.; Deisseroth, K.; Shenoy, K.V.; "An opotgenetic toolbox designed for primates." Nature Neuroscience. Vol. 14. pp. 387-397. Jan 2011.
5. Osorio I, Frei MG, Wilkinson SB. Epilepsia, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 615-627, June 1998.
6. Craddock, C.R.; Holtzheimer, P.E.; Hu, X.P.; Mayberg, H.S.; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol 62, no. 6. pp. 1619-1628. Dec. 2009.
7. Tass, P. et al. Journal of Neural Engineering. Vol 7. pp. 1-16. 2010.
8. Miyazawa, G.C.; Stone, R.; Molnar, G.F.; "Next generation deep brain stimulation therapy: modeling field steering in the brain with segmented electrodes". Society for Neuroscience, 693.21, San Diego, CA, 2007.
9. Chaturvedi, A.; Butson, C.R.; Lempka, S.F.,; Cooper, S.E., McIntyre, C.C. Brain Stimulation. Vol 3. pp 65-77. 2010.
10. Hahn, P.J.; McIntryre, C.C.; Journal of Computational Neuroscience. Dec 2008.
11. Denison, T. ; Santa, W.; Molnar, G.; Miesel, K.; "Micropower Sensors for Neuroprosthetics." IEEE Sensors. Oct 2007.
12. Stanslaski, S.; Stylpulkowski, P.; Giftakis, J.; Kemp, J.; Isaacson, B.; Cong, P.; Shafquat, A.; Afshar, P.; Denison, T.; "Preliminary validation of an implantable bi-directional neural interface for chronic, in vivo, investigation of brain networks." EMBS Cancun. April 2011.
13. Ince, N.F.; et al.; Neurosurgery. Vol. 67. No. 2. pp. 390-397. Aug 2010.
14. Wei, X.; et al. "Functional Electrical Stimulation as a Neuroprosthetic Methodology for Enabling Closed-loop Urinary Incontinence Treatment." EMBS Cancun. April 2011.