Does psychotherapy research influence the clinical practice of researcher-clinicians?

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 357-371

  Safran, Jeremy D ^a   Abreu, Iris ^a   Ogilvie, Joseph ^a   Demaria, Anthony ^a  

^a NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Professional expertise; Research and practice; Research utilization; Research practice gap

Indexed keywords

EID: 84055199782     PISSN: 09695893     EISSN: 14682850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2011.01267.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Angus, L., Hayes, J. A., Anderson, T., Ladany, N., Castonguay, L. G., & Muran, J. C. (2010). Future directions: Emerging opportunities and challenges in psychotherapy research. In L. Castonguay, J. C. Muran, L. Angus, J. Hayes, N. Ladany, & T. Anderson (Eds.), Bringing psychotherapy research to life: Understanding change through the work of leading clinical researchers (pp. 353-362). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Aron, L. (1999). Clinical choices and the relational matrix. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 9, 1-29.
3. Baker, T. B., McFall, R. M., & Shoham, V. (2009). Current status and future prospects of clinical psychology: Towards a scientifically principled approach to mental and behavioral health care. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 67-103.
4. Bergin, A. E., & Strupp, H. H. (1972). Changing frontiers in the science of psychotherapy. Chicago: Aldine.
5. Beutler, L. E., Williams, R. E., Wakefield, P. J., & Entwistle, S. R. (1995). Bridging scientist and practitioner perspectives in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 50, 984-994.
6. Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T., & Dasgupta, A. (2001). Interval estimation for a binominal proportion. Statistical Science, 16, 101-103.
7. Castonguay, L., Muran, J., Angus, L., Hayes, J., Ladany, N., & Anderson, T. (2010). Bringing psychotherapy research to life: Understanding change through the work of leading clinical researchers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.
9. Clopper, C., & Pearson, E. S. (1934). The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika, 26, 404-413.
10. Cohen, L. H., Sargent, M. M., & Sechrest, L. B. (1986). Use of professional research by professional psychologists. American Psychologist, 41, 198-206.
11. Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Dillman, D. A. (2006). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
13. Dreyfus, H. E., & Dreyfus, S. L. (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.
14. Elliott, R. (1984). A discovery oriented approach to significant events in psychotherapy. In L. N. Rice & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Patterns of change: Intensive analysis of psychotherapy process (pp. 249-286). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Elliott, R., & Morrow-Bradley, C. (1994). Developing a working marriage between psychotherapists and psychotherapy researchers: Identifying shared purposes. In P. F. Talley, H. H. Strupp, & J. F. Butler (Eds.), Psychotherapy research and practice (pp. 124-142). New York: Basic Books.
16. Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (2009). Development of professional expertise. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Fishman, D. B. (1999). The case for pragmatic psychology. New York: NYU Press.
18. Gendlin, E. (1986). What comes after traditional psychotherapy research? American Psychologist, 41, 131-136.
19. Goldfried, M. R., & Safran, J. D. (1986). Future directions in psychotherapy integration. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Handbook of eclectic psychotherapy (pp. 463-483). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
20. Goldfried, M. R., & Wolfe, B. E. (1996). Psychotherapy practice and research: Repairing a strained alliance. American Psychologist, 51, 1007-1017.
21. Goldfried, M. R., & Wolfe, B. E. (1998). Toward a more clinically valid approach to therapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 143-150.
22. Greenberg, L. S. (1984). Task analysis of intrapersonal conflict. In L. N. Rice & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Patterns of change: Intensive analysis of psychotherapy process (pp. 67-123). New York: Guilford Press.
23. Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Change process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 4-11.
24. Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196-205.
25. Hoffman, I. (2009). Doublethinking our way to "scientific" legitimacy: The desiccation of human experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57, 1043-1070.
26. Hoyt, W. T., & Bhati, K. S. (2007). Principles and practices: An empirical examination of qualitative research in the Journal of Counseling Psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 201-210.
27. Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Klein, G. (2009). Streetlights and shadows: Searching for the keys to adaptive decision making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 139-193). New York: Wiley.
30. Lampropoulos, G. K., Goldfried, M. R., Castonguay, L. G., Lambert, M. J., Stiles, W. B., & Nestoros, J. (2002). What kind of research can we realistically expect from practitioners? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1241-1264.
31. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
32. Lucock, M. P., Hall, P., & Noble, R. (2006). A survey of influences on the practice of psychotherapists and clinical psychologists in the UK. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 123-130.
33. Luyten, P., Blatt, S. J., & Corveleyn, J. (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54, 571-610.
34. Morrow-Bradley, C., & Elliott, R. (1986). The utilization of psychotherapy research by practicing psychotherapists. American Psychologist, 41, 188-197.
35. Mussell, M. P., Crosby, R. D., Crow, S. J., Knopke, A. J., Peterson, C. B., Wonderlich, S. A., et al. (2000). Utilization of empirically supported psychotherapy treatments for individuals with eating disorders: A survey of psychologists. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 27, 230-237.
36. Norcross, J. (Ed.). (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Norcross, J. (Ed.). (2011). Psychotherapy relationships that work (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Nunez, N., Poole, D. A., & Memon, A. (2003). Psychology's two cultures revisited: Implications for the integration of science with practice. Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 2, 8-19.
39. Orlinsky, D. (1995). The graying and greening of SPR: A personal memoir on forming the Society for Psychotherapy Research. Psychotherapy Research, 5, 343-350.
40. Persons, J. B., & Silberschatz, G. (1998). Are results of randomized controlled trials useful to psychotherapists? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 126-135.
41. Rennie, D. L., Phillips, J. R., & Quartaro, G. K. (1988). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology. Canadian Psychology, 29, 139-150.
42. Rennie, D. L., Watson, K. D., & Montiero, A. M. (2002). The rise of qualitative research in psychology. Canadian Psychology, 43, 179-189.
43. Rice, L. N., & Greenberg, L. S. (1984). Patterns of change: Intensive analysis of psychotherapy process. New York: Guilford Press.
44. Safran, J. D. (2001). When worlds collide: Psychoanalysis and the empirically supported treatment movement. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 659-681.
45. Safran, J. D., & Aron, L. (2001). The implications of the empirically supported treatment controversy for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 571-582.
46. Safran, J. D., Greenberg, L. S., & Rice, L. N. (1988). Integrating psychotherapy research and practice: Modeling the change process. Psychotherapy, 25, 1-17.
47. Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (1994). Toward a working alliance between research and practice. In P. F. Talley, H. H. Strupp, & J. F. Butler (Eds.), Psychotherapy research and practice (pp. 206-226). New York: Basic Books.
48. Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York: Guilford Press.
49. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
50. Seligman, M. E. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports study. American Psychologist, 50, 965-974.
51. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52. Stewart, R. E., & Chambless, D. L. (2007). Does psychotherapy research inform treatment decisions in private practice? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 267-281.
53. Stiles, W. B. (1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 593-618.
54. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Strupp, H. H. (2001). Implications of the empirically supported treatment movement for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 11, 605-619.
56. Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 631-663.
57. Wolfe, B. E., & Goldfried, M. R. (1988). Toward a more clinically valid approach to research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 143-150.