Suggestions in maternal and child health for the national Technology Assessment Programme: A consideration of consumer and professional priorities

Journal of The Royal Society for the Promotion of Health

Volumn 122, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 50-54

  Johanson, R ^a   Rigby, C ^a   Newburn, M ^b   Stewart, M ^c   Jones, P ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL CHILDBIRTH TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audit; Consumer; Maternity; Priorities; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH; CONSUMER; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MATERNAL WELFARE; MEDICAL AUDIT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;

EID: 0036105882     PISSN: 14664240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/146642400212200115     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Who decides on treatment: The patient versus the state
2. Abstracts
3. Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district
4. The perinatal research agenda: Whose priorities?
5. Unbiased, relevant, and reliable assessments in health care
6. Measuring public priorities for insurable health care
7. Involving patients in clinical research
8. About the HTA programme
9. Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions
10. ASQUAM - Achieving sustainable quality in maternity services
11. Clinical governance in practice
12. Democratic prioritization of maternity care: A rational basis for planning a clinical effectiveness programme
13. Democratic prioritization of audit topics as part of a clinical effectiveness programme
14. Improving maternity care. Democratic prioritisation of audit topics as part of a clinical effectiveness programme
15. Randomised controlled trials in perinatal medicine: Identifying and measuring endpoints in randomised controlled trials
16. Setting priorities: Is there a role for citizens' juries?
17. Clinical governance and drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England
18. The NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment Programme
19. Is there a 'typical' consumer of obstetric services?
20. Opinions of Dutch physicians, nurses and citizens on health care policy, rationing and technology
21. In the rationing of healthcare in indigent African populations, which services should come first?