Towards a movement quantification system capable of automatic evaluation of upper limb motor function after neurological injury

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 5456-5460

  Bento, Virgilio F ^a   Cruz, Vitor T ^b   Ribeiro, David D ^a   Cunha, João P S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b Hospital So Sebastio   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC EVALUATION; DECISION TREE CLASSIFIERS; FUNCTIONAL ABILITIES; INTEGRATED SYSTEMS; MEAN ERRORS; MOTION CAPTURE SYSTEM; MOTOR FUNCTION; NEUROLOGICAL INJURY; PROOF OF CONCEPT; THREE-DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS; UPPER LIMBS;

DECISION TREES; KINEMATICS;

FUNCTION EVALUATION;

ACCELERATION; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARM; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMAN; MAGNETOMETRY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; STROKE;

ACCELERATION; ARM; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MAGNETOMETRY; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; MOVEMENT; STROKE;

EID: 84055192748     PISSN: 1557170X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091392     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Patel, S., et al., A Novel Approach to Monitor Rehabilitation Outcomes in Stroke Survivors Using Wearable Technology. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2010. 98(3): p. 450-461.
2. Subramanian, S.K., et al., Validity of Movement Pattern Kinematics as Measures of Arm Motor Impairment Poststroke. Stroke, 2010. 41(10): p. 2303-2308.
3. Wolf, S.L., et al., Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and headinjured patients. Experimental Neurology, 1989. 104(2): p. 125-132.
4. Wolf, S.L., et al., Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke. Stroke, 2001. 32(7): p. 1635-1639.
5. Lin, K.-c., et al., Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Stroke Patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2009.
6. Wolf, S.L., et al., The EXCITE Trial: Attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Patients with Subacute Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2005. 19(3): p. 194-205.
7. Rohrer, B., et al., Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2002. 22(18): p. 8297-8304.
8. Flash, T. and N. Hogan, The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. The Journal of Neuroscience, 1985. 5(7): p. 1688-1703.
9. Parnandi, A., et al. Motor function assessment using wearable inertial sensors. in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 2010.