Local development policies and the foreclosure crisis in california: Can local policies hold back national tides?

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 64-85

  Glasgow, Garrett ^a   Lewis, Paul G ^b   Neiman, Max ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

foreclosure crisis; growth management; housing bubble; local government; slow growth

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMY; CRISIS MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; MACROECONOMICS; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN HOUSING; URBAN POLICY;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84055178602     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: 15528332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087411418626     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adler Lynn.U.S. 2009 foreclosures shatter record despite aid.Reuters. 2010;:.
2. Altshuler Alan A.,Gomez-Ibañez Jose A.Regulation for revenue: The political economy of land use exactions. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1993:.
3. Baldassare Mark,Protash William.Growth controls, population growth, and community satisfaction.American Sociological Review. 1982;47 (3): 339-46.
4. Baldassare Mark,Wilson Georjeanna.More trouble in paradise: Urbanization and the decline in suburban quality-of-life ratings.Urban Affairs Review. 1995;30 (5): 690-708.
5. Baldassare Mark,Wilson Georjeanna.Changing sources of suburban support for local growth controls.Urban Studies. 1996;33 (3): 459-71.
6. Barbour, Elisa, and Paul G. Lewis. 1998. Development priorities in California cities: Results from a PPIC survey. Occasional paper. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
7. Blau Francine D.,Graham John W.Black-White differences in wealth and asset composition.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1990;105 (2): 321-39.
8. Byun Pillsung,Waldorf Brigitte S.,Esparza Adrian X.Spillovers and local growth controls: An alternative perspective on suburbanization.Growth and Change. 2005;36 (2): 196-219.
9. DataQuick News. 2010. Housing foreclosure statistics [data file]. http://ca.rand.org/stats/economics/foreclose.html.
10. DataQuick News. 2011. Housing prices and transaction statistics[data file]. http://ca.rand.org/stats/economics/houseprice.html.
11. Diaz Daniel,Green Gary Paul.Fiscal stress and growth management effort in Wisconsin cities, villages, and towns.State and Local Government Review. 2001;33 (1): 7-22.
12. Donovan Todd,Neiman Max.Citizen mobilization and the adoption of local growth control.Political Research Quarterly. 1992;45 (3): 651-75.
13. Dowall DavidThe suburban squeeze: Land conversion and regulation in the San Francisco Bay Area. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984:.
14. Fischel William A.The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land use policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2001:.
15. Gerber Elisabeth R.,Phillips Justin H.Direct democracy and land use policy: Exchanging public goods for development rights.Urban Studies. 2004;41 (2): 463-79.
16. Glaeser Edward L.,Schuetz Jenny,Ward BryceRegulation and the rise of housing prices in Greater Boston. Cambridge, MA: Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research and Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; 2006:.
17. Glaeser Edward L.,Gyourko Joseph,Saiz Albert.Housing supply and housing bubbles.Journal of Urban Economics. 2008;64 (2): 198-217.
18. Glickfeld, Madelyn and Ned Levine. 1992. Regional growth, local reaction: The enactment and effects of local growth control and management measures in California. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
19. Gottdiener MarkThe decline of urban politics: Political theory and the crisis of the local state. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1987:.
20. Green Richard K.Land use regulation and the price of housing in a suburban Wisconsin county.Journal of Housing Economics. 1999;8 (2): 144-59.
21. Green Richard K.,Malpezzi Stephen,Mayo Stephen K.Metropolitan-specific estimates of the price elasticity of supply of housing, and their sources.American Economic Review. 2005;95 (2): 334-39.
22. Howley Kathleen M.Mortgage foreclosures hit record as job losses strain budgets.Bloomberg Businessweek. 2010;:.
23. Immergluck Daniel.Neighborhoods in the wake of the debacle: Intrametropolitan patterns of foreclosed properties.Urban Affairs Review. 2010;46 (1): 3-36.
24. Immergluck Daniel,Smith Geoff.Measuring the effect of subprime lending on neighborhood foreclosures: Evidence from Chicago.Urban Affairs Review. 2005;40 (3): 362-89.
25. Immergluck Daniel,Smith Geoff.The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on neighborhood crime.Housing Studies. 2006a;21 (6): 851-66.
26. Immergluck Daniel,Smith Geoff.The external costs of foreclosure: The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on property values.Housing Policy Debate. 2006b;17 (1): 57-79.
27. Johnson Katherine M.,Schmidt Charles G."Room to grow": Urban ambitions and the limits to growth in Weld County, Colorado.Urban Affairs Review. 2010;44 (4): 525-53.
28. Kan Joel.Sources of foreclosure data.MBA Research Datanotes. 2008;:.
29. Kantor Paul P.1995. The dependent city revisited: The political economy of urban development and social policy. 2nd ed.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30. Kaplan David H.,Sommers Gail G.An analysis of the relationship between housing foreclosures, lending practices, and neighborhood ecology: Evidence from a distressed county.Professional Geographer. 2009;61 (1): 101-20.
31. King Gary.Variance specification in event count models: From restrictive assumptions to a generalized estimator.American Journal of Political Science. 1989;33 (3): 762-84.
32. King Gary,Tomz Michael,Wittenberg Jason.Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation.American Journal of Political Science. 2000;44 (2): 347-61.
33. Landis John D.Do growth controls work? A new assessment.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1992;58 (4): 489-508.
34. Landis John D.Growth management revisited: Efficacy, price effects, and displacement.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2006;72 (4): 411-30.
35. Levine Ned.The effect of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in California.Urban Studies. 1999;36 (12): 2047-68.
36. Levy Dan.U.S. property owners lost $3.3 trillion in home value.Bloomberg. 2009;:.
37. Lewis, Paul G., and Max Neiman. 2000. Residential development and growth control policies: Survey results from cities in three California regions. Occasional paper. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
38. Lewis Paul G.,Neiman MaxCustodians of place: Governing the growth and development of cities. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2009:.
39. Logan John R.,Crowder Kyle D.Political regimes and suburban growth, 1980-1990.City & Community. 2002;1 (1): 113-35.
40. Logan John R.,Molotch Harvey L.Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1987:.
41. Logan John R.,Zhou Min.Do suburban growth controls control growth?.American Sociological Review. 1989;54 (3): 461-71.
42. Malpezzi Stephen.Urban regulation, the "new economy," and housing prices.Housing Policy Debate. 2002;13 (2): 323-49.
43. Malpezzi Stephen,Mayo Stephen K.Getting housing incentives right: A case study of the effects of regulation, taxes, and subsidies on housing supply in Malaysia.Land Economics. 1997;73 (3): 372-91.
44. Mollenkopf John H.The contested city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1983:.
45. Nguyen Mai Thi.Local growth control at the ballot box: Real effects or symbolic politics?.Journal of Urban Affairs. 2007;29 (2): 129-47.
46. Oliver Melvin,Shapiro ThomasBlack wealth / White wealth. 2006. Black wealth / White wealth. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.New York: Routledge.
47. O'Keefe Suzanne.The impact of slow growth policies on local economies: Through housing boom and bust.Applied Geography.
48. O'Toole Randal.How urban planners caused the housing bubble.Cato Policy Analysis Series. 2009;no. 646:.
49. Pagano Michael A.,Bowman Ann O'M.Cityscapes and capital. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1995:.
50. Pendall Rolf.Local land use regulations and the chain of exclusion.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2000;66 (2): 125-42.
51. Peterson Paul E.City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1981:.
52. Quigley John M.,Raphael Steven.Regulation and the high cost of housing in California.American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings. 2005;95 (2): 323-28.
53. Quigley John M.,Rosenthal Larry A.The effects of land use regulation on the price of housing: What do we know? What can we learn?.Cityscape. 2005;8 (1): 69-137.
54. Quigley John M.,Raphael Steven,Rosenthal Larry A.Housing markets and the economy: Risk, regulation, and policy. Glaeser Edward L.Quigley John M., ed. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 2009:271-300.
55. Schneider MarkThe competitive city: The political economy of suburbia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; 1989:.
56. Schuetz Jenny,Been Vicki,Ellen Ingrid Gould.Neighborhood effects of concentrated mortgage foreclosures.Journal of Housing Economics. 2008;17 (4): 306-19.
57. Shen Qing.Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: The San Francisco Bay region in the 1980s.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 1996;23 (1): 61-91.
58. Staley Samuel.Ballot-box zoning, transaction costs, and urban growth.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2001;67 (1): 25-37.
59. State of California, Department of Finance. 2010. E-5 population and housing estimates for cities, counties and the state, 2001-2010, with 2000 benchmark.
60. State of California, Employment Development Department. 2011. Monthly labor force data for cities and Census Designated Places (CDP), annual average 2008-revised. Sacramento, CA: California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Information Division.
61. Steel Brent S.,Lovrich Nicholas P.Growth management policy and county government: Correlates of policy adoption across the United States.State and Local Government Review. 2000;32 (1): 7-19.
62. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Census of population and housing, summary file 3 [data file]. http://www.census.gov/census2000/sumfile3.html.
63. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1991. "Not in my back yard": Removing barriers to affordable housing. Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing.
64. Warner Kee,Molotch Harvey.Power to build: How development persists despite local controls.Urban Affairs Review. 1995;30 (3): 378-406.
65. Wirt Frederick M.The dependent city? External influences upon local control.Journal of Politics. 1985;47 (1): 83-112.
66. Wong Kenneth K.Economic constraint and political choice in urban policymaking.American Journal of Political Science. 1988;32 (1): 1-18.